Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

THE INFLUENCE OF IRM TEMPORARY RESTORATIONS ON MARGINAL MICROLEAKAGE OF DENTIN ADHESIVES

IRM 임시수복이 상아질 접착제의 변연 미세누출에 미치는 영향

  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Kyung (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 김현경 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 이영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Published : 2003.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated the influence of IRM on marginal microleakage of 5th generation adhesives. Class V cavities with gingival margins in dentin were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of 60 extract-ed human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into six groups. Group 1 and 4 received no temporary restoration with IRM. Group 2 and 5 were covered with IRM mixed at P/L ratio(10g/1g). Group 3 and 6 were covered with IRM mixed at P/L ratio(10g/2g). The temporary restorations were removed mechanically with an ultrasonic scaler after one-week storage in distilled water. The cavities were restored using one of two adhesives and composites ; Single Bond/Filtek Z 250(Croup 1, 2 and 3), UniFil Bond/UniFil F(Group 4, 5 and 6). Following one day storage in distilled water, the restored teeth were thermocycled for 500 cycles(between $5^{\circ}C{\;}and{\;}55^{\circ}C$) and immersed in 2 % methylene blue for dye penetration testing. The results were analysed using Kruskal-Wallis Test, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed ranked test at a significance level of 0.05. The results of this study were as follows 1. Ranking of mean microleakage scores at the enamel margins was Group 10.05) 4. At the dentin margins, the microleakage of the group not pretreated with IRM was lower than that of the group pretreated with IRM. And the microleakage of UniFil Bond was lower than that of Single Bond. 5. Compared with microleakages between the enamel and dentin margins of each groups, Group 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 at dentin margin were higher microleakage than those at enamel margin. There were significant difference between enamel and dentin microleakage of Group 2 and 3(p<0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Bayne SC, Heyman HO. Swift EJ Jr. : Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 125(6) 687-701, 1994 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1994.0113
  2. Peter EM, Abeer AH, Anthony JS, Charles FC : Bacterial microleakage and pulp inflammation associated with various restorative materials. Dent Mater 18 : 470-478, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00072-0
  3. Yap AUJ, Shah KC, Loh EJ, Sim SS, Tan CC : Influence of eugenol-containing temporary restorations on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent 26 : 556-561, 2001
  4. Imad AH, Jean C, Jacques D, Jean CF : Eugenol diffusion through dentin related to dentin hydraulic conductance. Dent Mater 14 : 229-236, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00028-1
  5. Hume WR : An analysis of the release and diffusion through dentin of eugenol from zinc oxide-eugenol mixtures. J Dent Res 63(6) : 881-884, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630061301
  6. Kielbassa AM, Attin T, Hellwig E : Diffusion behavior of eugenol from zinc oxide-eugenol mixtures through human and bovine dentin in vitro. Oper Dent 22(1) : 15-20, 1997
  7. Tiara J. Ikemoto T, Yoneya T, Hagi A, Murakami A, Makino K : Essential oils phenyl propanoids. Useful as OH scavenger? Free Radical Research Communications 16 : 197-204, 1992 https://doi.org/10.3109/10715769209049172
  8. Grajower R, Hirschfeld Z, Zalkind M : Compatibility of a composite resin with pulp insulating materials. A scanning electron microscope study. J Prosthet Dent 32(1) : 70-77, 1974 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(74)90101-2
  9. Lingard GL, Davies EH, Von Fraunhofer JA : The interaction between lining materials and composite resin restorative materials, J Oral Rehab 8(2): 121-129, 1981 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00485.x
  10. Marshall SJ, Marshall GW, Hardcourt JK : The influence of various cavity bases on the micro-hardness of composite. Aus Dent J 27(5) : 291-295, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1982.tb05249.x
  11. Baier RE : Principles of adhesion. Oper Dent Supplement 5 : 1-9, 1992
  12. AI-Ehaideb AA, Mohammed H : Microleakage of 'onebottle' dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 26 : 172-175, 2001
  13. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE : Evaluation of adhesive systems using acidic primers. Am J Dent 10(5) : 219-223, 1997
  14. Nakajima M, Sano H. Urabe I, Tagami J, Pashley DH : Bond strength of single-bottle dentin adhesives to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 25 : 2-10, 2000
  15. Ogata M, Okuda M, Nakajima M, Pereira PNR, Sano H, Tagami J : Influence of the direction of tubules on bond strength to dentin. Oper Dent 26 : 27-35, 2001
  16. Prati C, Pashley DH, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R : Marginal hybrid layer in class V restorations. Oper Dent 25 : 228-233, 2000
  17. Yoshiyama M, Urayama A, Kimochi T, Matsuo T, Pashley DH : Comparison of conventional vs self-etching adhesives bonds to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 25 : 163-169, 2000
  18. 조영곤, 김영관, 안종모 : 상아질 접착제에 따른 미세누출과 변연부 혼화층. 대한치과보존학회지 27(1) : 34-41, 2002
  19. Gallo JR. Burgess JO, Xu X : Effect of delayed application on shear bond strength of four fifth-generation bonding systems. Oper Dent 26 : 27-35, 2001
  20. Nakayabashi N : Dentinal bonding mechanism. Quint Int 22(2) : 73-74, 1991
  21. Kanca J : Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 5(4) : 213-215, 1992
  22. Pitter AV, Heyman HO, Swift E Jr, Perdigao J, Rosa BT : Effect of different rs-wetting techniques on dentin shear bond strength. J Esth Dent 12 : 85-96, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00205.x
  23. Zheng L, Pereira PNR, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J : Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 26 : 97-104, 2001
  24. Hanning M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B : Composite to dentin bond strength, micromorphology of the bonded dentin interface and marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations using self-etching primers. Oper Dent 26 : 157-165, 2001
  25. Chigara H, Yukitani W, Hasegawa T, Manabe A, Itoh K, Hayakawa T, Debari K, Wakumoto S, Hisamitsu H : Self-etching dentin primers containing phenyl-P, J Dent Res 73(5) : 1088-1095, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730051101
  26. Rosa BT, Perdigao J : Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives, Quint Int 31 : 353-358, 2000
  27. Schwartz R. Davis R, Mayhew R : The effect of a ZOE temporary cement on the bond strength of a resin luting cement. Am J Dent 3(1) : 28-30, 1990
  28. Jung M, Ganss C, Senger S : Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cement on bond strength of composite to enamel. Oper Dent 23(2) : 63-68, 1998
  29. Xie J, Power JM, McGuckin RS : In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 9(5) : 295-299, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90046-S
  30. Terata R, Nakashima K, Obara M, Kubota M : Characterization of enamel and dentin surface after removal of temporary cement-effect of temporary cement on tensile bond strength of resin luting cement. Dent Mater J 13(2) : 148-154, 1994 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.13.148
  31. Ganss C, Jung M : Effect of eugenol-containing temporary cement on bond strength of composite to dentin. Oper Dent 23(2) : 55-62, 1998
  32. Kelsey WP, Latta MA, Blankenau RJ : Effect of provision restorations on dentin bond strength of resin cements. Am J Dent 11 : 67-70, 1998
  33. Samuel S : Biologic properties of eugenol and zinc oxide-eugenol. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 73 : 729-737, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(92)90020-Q
  34. 장헌수, 조규종 : Temporary cement가 상아질 접착제의 접착성능에 미치는 영향, 대한치과보존학회지 20(2) : 685-698, 1995
  35. Woody TL, Davis RD : The effect of eugenol-containing and eugenol free temporary cements on microleakage in resin bonded restorations. Oper Dent 17(5) : 175-180, 1992
  36. Peutzfeldt A, Asmunssen E : Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on efficacy of dentin-bonding system. Eur J Oral Science 107(1) : 65-69, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1999.eos107110.x
  37. Yap AUJ, Shah KC, Loh EJ, Sim SS, Tan CC : Influence of ZOE temporary restorations on microleakage in composite restoration. Oper Dent 27 : 142-146, 2002
  38. Hanning M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B : Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite- to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 24: 172-180, 1999
  39. Torii Y, Itou R, Hikasa S, Iwata Y : Enamel tensile bond strength and morphology of resin-enamel interface created by acid etching system with or without moisture and self-etching priming system. J Oral Rehabil 29 : 528-533, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00855.x
  40. Perdigao J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P : Effect of selfetching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 10 : 141-146, 1997
  41. Nakanuma K. Arisue K. Kajiwara A. Niinuma A. Murakami Y, Yamazaki M, Hayakawa T, Nemoto K : Evaluation of new type of commercially available adhesive systems-effect of total treatment for enamel and dentin. Jpn J Conserv Dent 39 : 304-314, 1996
  42. Terata R : Characterization of enamel and dentin surfaces after removal of temporary cement - study on removal of temporary cement. Dent Mater J 12 : 1828, 1993
  43. Dibdin GH, Poole DF : Surface area and pore size analysis for human enamel and dentin by water vapour sorption. Archi Oral Biology 27 : 235-241, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(82)90057-7
  44. Finger WJ, Fritz UB : Resin bonding to enamel and dentin with one-component UDMA/HEMA adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 105(2) : 183-186, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00198.x
  45. Uno S. Inoue H, Finger WJ, Inouw S, Sano H : Microtensile bond strength evaluation of three adhesive systems in cervical dentin cavities. J Adhes Dent 3 : 333-341, 2001

Cited by

  1. Effect of microleakage of a self-etching primer adhesive according to types of cutting instruments vol.32, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.4.327