DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Numerical Study on the Effects of Velocity Profile Distortion and Swirl on Pressure Difference of Orifice Flowmeter Due to Pipe structure

배관구조에 따른 속도분포 변형과 선회가 오리피스 유량계의 압력차에 미치는 영향에 대한 수치적 연구

  • 김홍민 (인하대학교 대학원 기계공학과) ;
  • 허재영 (한국가스공사 연구개발원) ;
  • 김광용 (인하대학교 기계공학부)
  • Published : 2003.10.01

Abstract

Three-dimensional pipe flows with elbows, tees and headers in three different pipe systems are calculated to estimate the effect of asymmetry of axial velocity profile and swirl on measuring accuracy of an orifice flowmeter. It is evaluated how the pressure difference across the orifice is dependent on the upstream straight pipe length and how swirl intensity, swirl angle, and axial velocity distribution affect the measuring error of the orifice flowmeter. From the results, it is found that variation of the pressure difference across the orifice is negligible in case that maximum swirl angle is less than 2$^{\circ}$, and also that the pressure difference across the orifice is more sensitive to the asymmetry of axial velocity profile rather than the swirl intensity.

Keywords

References

  1. ANSI/API, 1985, Orifice Metering of natural Gas and Other Related Hydrocarbon Fluids 2 Edn. American Gas Association and American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC
  2. Morrow,T.B. and Park, J.T., 1992, 'Effects of tube bundle location on orifice mether error and velocity profiles,' Pipeline Technology, V-A, pp 13-17
  3. Shen, J.J.S., 1992, 'Velocity profile survey in a 16-in custody-transfer orifice mether for natural gas,' SPE Prod, Engng., Vol. 5, pp. 40-44
  4. Shen, J. J. S., 1991, 'Characterization of swirling flow and its effects on orifice metering,' SPE paper 22865 66th Annual Conf. Exhib. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Dallas, TX
  5. Mattingly, G. E., Yeh, T. T., 1990, 'Flowmeter Installation Effects Due to Several Elbow Configurations,' 2nd Int. Symp. Fluid Flow Measurement, June 6-8. 1990, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  6. Prabu, S. V., Mascomani, R., Balakrishnan, K. and Konnur, M. S., 1996, 'Effects of upstream pipe fittings on the performance of orifice and conical flowmeters,' Flow Meas. Instrum., Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 49-54 https://doi.org/10.1016/0955-5986(96)00001-5
  7. Morrison, G. L., Hall, K. R., Macek, M. L., Ihfe, L. M., DeOtte, R. E., and Hauglie, J. E., 1994, 'Upstream velocity profile effects on orifice flowmeters,' Flow Meas. Instrum., Vol. 5, pp. 87-91 https://doi.org/10.1016/0955-5986(94)90041-8
  8. Brennan, J. A., McFaddin, S. E., Sindt, C. F., Kothari, K. M., 1989, 'The Influence of Swirling Flow on Orifice and Turbine Flowmeter Performance,' Flow Meas. Instrum. Vol. 1, pp. 5-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0955-5986(89)90003-4
  9. Morrison, G. L., 1997, Flow Field Development Downstream of Two in Plane Elbows,' FEDSM97-3021
  10. Silva, F. S., Ruiz, J. H., Velazquez, T. and Ugalde, V. Z., 1998, 'Curved Pipe Flow Numerical Simulation for Metrology Purposes Using CFD 2000,' FEDSM 98-5287
  11. Langsholt, M., Thomassen, D., 1991, 'The Computation of Turbulent Flow through Pipe Fittings and the Decay of the Disturbed Flow in a Downstream Straight Pipe,' J. Flow Meas. Instrum. Vol. 2, pp. 45-55 https://doi.org/10.1016/0955-5986(91)90055-V
  12. KOGAS Flow Measurement data, 2001
  13. ISO 4006, 1992, Measurement of fluid flow in closed conduits-Vocabulary and symbols
  14. ISO 5167, 1991, Measurement of fluid flow by means of pressure differential devices