DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Thermal Annealing and Growth of CdIn2Te4 Single Crystal by Bridgeman Method

Bridgeman 법에 의한 CdIn2Te4단결정 성장과 열처리 효과

  • Hong, K.J. (Department of Physics, Chosun University) ;
  • Lee, S.Y. (Department of Physics, Chosun University) ;
  • Moon, J.D. (Department of Photoelectric, Dongshin University)
  • Published : 2003.03.01

Abstract

The $p-CdIn_2$$Te_4$single crystal was grown in the three-stage vertical electric furnace by using Bridgman method. The quality of the grown crystal has been investigated by the x-ray diffraction and the photoluminescence measurements. From the photoluminescence spectra of the as-grown $CdIn_2$$Te_4$crystal and the various heat-treated crystals, the ($D^{\circ}$, X) emission was found to be the dominant intensity in the photoluminescence spectrum of the $CdIn_2$T $e_4$:Cd, while the ($A^{\circ}$, X) emission completely disappeared in the $CdIn_2$T $e_4$:Cd. However, the ($A^{\circ}$, X) emission in the photoluminescence spectrum of the $CdIn_2$T $e_4$:Te was the dominant intensity like an as-grown $CdIn_2$T $e_4$crystal. These results indicated that the ($D^{\circ}$, X) is associated with $V_{Te}$ acted as donor and that the ($A^{\circ}$, X) emission is related to $V_{cd}$ acted as acceptor, respectively. The $p-CdIn_2$T $e_4$crystal was found to be obviously converted into the n-type after annealing in the Cd atmosphere. The origin of ( $D^{\circ}$, $A^{\circ}$) emission and its TO phonon replicas is related to the interaction between donors such as $V_{Te}$ or $Cd_{int}$, and accepters such as $V_{cd}$ or T $e_{int}$. Also, the In in the $CdIn_2$X$CdIn_4$was confirmed not to form the native defects because it existed in the stable form of bonds.

Keywords

References

  1. O. Madelung, in Landolt-Bornstein : Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, edited by O. Madelung (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985), Vol. 17h, p.124
  2. A. L. Gentile, Prog. Crystal Growth Charact. 10, 241 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-3535(84)90041-8
  3. S. S. Ou, S. A. Eshraghi, O. M. Stafsudd, and A. L. Gentile, J. Appl. Phys. 57, 355 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.334814
  4. S. Kianian, S. A. Eshraghi. O. M. Stafsudd, and A. L. Gentile, J. Appl. Phys. 62, 1500 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.339631
  5. V. Riede, H. Neumann, V. Kramer, and M. Kittel, Solid State Commun. 78, 211 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(91)90285-4
  6. S. A. Lopez-Rivera. L. Martinez, J. M. Briceno-Valero, R. Echeverria, and G. Gonzalez de Armengol, Prog. Crystal Growth Charact. 10, 297 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-3535(84)90048-0
  7. J. C. Woolley and B. Bay, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 15, 27 (1960) https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(60)90096-2
  8. D. G. Thomas, J. J. Hopfield, and M. Power, Phys. Rev. 119, 570 (1960) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.119.570
  9. P. M. Nikolic, D. Todorovic, and S. S. Vujatovic, Fizika 12, 192 (1980)
  10. K. J. Hong, J. W. Jeong, T. S. Jeong, Appl. Phys. letter(to be submitted)
  11. R. R. Sharma and S. Rodriguez, Phys. Rev. 159, 649 (1967) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.159.649
  12. F. A. Kroger, Rev. Phys. Appl. 12, 205 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1051/rphysap:01977001202020500