DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Junction Size Dependence of Magnetic and Magnetotransport Properties in MTJs

자기터널절합에서 자기 및 자기저항의 접합크기 의존성

  • Sankaranarayanan, V.K. (Department of Materials Science and Engineering Chungnam National University) ;
  • Hu, Yong-kang (Department of Materials Science and Engineering Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Cheol-Gi (Department of Materials Science and Engineering Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Oh (Department of Materials Science and Engineering Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Hee-bok (Department of Pysics Education, Kongju National University)
  • 상카라나라얀 (공주대학교 사범대학 물리학과) ;
  • 호영강 (충남대학교 공과대학 재료공학과) ;
  • 김철기 (충남대학교 공과대학 재료공학과) ;
  • 김종오 (충남대학교 공과대학 재료공학과) ;
  • 이의복 (공주대학교 사범대학 물리학과)
  • Published : 2003.06.01

Abstract

Magneto-optic Kerr Effect(MOKE), AFM and magnetoresistance measurements have been carried out on as-deposited and annealed Magnetic Tunnel Junctions(MTJs) with junction sizes 180, 250, 320 and 380 $\mu\textrm{m}$ in order to investigate the correlation among interlayer exchange coupling, surface roughness and junction size. Relatively irregular variations of coercivity $H_{c}$ (∼17.5 Oe) and interlayer exchange coupling $H_{E}$ (∼17.5 Oe) are observed over the junction in as-deposited sample prepared by DC magnetron sputtering. After annealing at $200^{\circ}C$, $H_{c}$ decreases to 15 Oe, while $H_{ E}$ increases to 20 Oe with smooth local variation. $H_{E}$ shows very good correlation with surface roughness across the junction in agreement with Neel's orange peel coupling. The increasing slope per $\mu\textrm{m}$ of normalized $H_{c}$ and $H_{E}$ are same near junction edge along free-layer direction irrespective of junction size, giving relatively uniform $H_{c}$ and $H_{ E}$ for wider junction size. Thickness profiles of the junctions measured with $\alpha$-step show increasingly flat top surface for larger junctions, indicating better uniformity for large. junctions in agreement with the normalized$ H_{c}$ and H$/_{E}$ curves. TMR ratios also increase with increasing junction size, indicating improvement for larger uniform junctions.

Keywords

References

  1. S. S. P. Parkin, K. P. Roche, M. G. Samant, P. M. Rice, R. B. Beyers, R. E. Scheuerlein, E. J. OiSullivan, S. L. Brown, J. Bucchigano, D. W. Abraham, Yu Lu, M. Rooks, P. L. Trouilloud, R. A. Wanner and W. J. Gallagher., J. Appl. Phys., 85, 5828 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.369932
  2. J. S. Moodera, L. R. Kinder, T. M. Wong and R. Meservey, Phys. Rev. Lett., 74, 3273 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3273
  3. T. Miyazaki and N. Tezuka, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 139, L231 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(95)90001-2
  4. C. G. Kim, T. Shoyama, M. Tsunoda, M. Takahashi, T. Y. Lee and C. O. Kim Korean J.Magnetics, 7, 72 (2002) https://doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2002.7.3.072
  5. M. Julliere, Phys. Lett., 54A, 225 (1975)
  6. J. C. Slonczewski, Phys. Rev., B39, 6995 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.39.6995
  7. J. S. Moodera, L. R. Kinder, J. Nowak, P. LeClair and R. Meservey, Appl. Phys. Lett., 69, 708 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.117814
  8. J. C. S. Cools, W. Kula, D. Mauri and T. Lin J. Appl. Phys., 85, 4466 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.370376
  9. M. Tsunoda, K. Nishigawa, S. Ogata, M. Takahashi, Appl. Phys. Lett., 80 (2002) 3135 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1475363
  10. J. E. Mahan, Physical vapor deposition of thin films, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, 2000, Ch. VII.5