시설방울토마토에서 호박벌(Bombus ignitus)의 방화활동 및 과도한 방화가 토마토에 미치는 영향

The Influence of over Foraging, and Pollinating Activities on Tomato Fruits by a Korean Native Bumblebee, Bombus ignitus S, (Hymenoptera : Apidae) in Cherry-tomato Houses

  • 이상범 (농촌진흥청 농업고학기술원 잠사곤충부 곤충자원과 화분매개곤충연구실) ;
  • 배태웅 (동아대학교 생명자원과학대 생명자원과학부) ;
  • 김삼은 (농촌진흥청 농업고학기술원 잠사곤충부 곤충자원과 화분매개곤충연구실) ;
  • 윤형주 (농촌진흥청 농업고학기술원 잠사곤충부 곤충자원과 화분매개곤충연구실) ;
  • 이명렬 (농촌진흥청 농업고학기술원 잠사곤충부 곤충자원과 화분매개곤충연구실) ;
  • 채영 (농촌진흥청 원예연구소 채소육종과 과채류육종실)
  • Lee, Sang-Bum (Department of Sericulture and Entomology, The National Institute of Agricultural Science & Technology, RDA) ;
  • Bae, Tae-Woong (Faculty of Natural Resources and Life Science, Dong-A University) ;
  • Kim, Sam-Eun (Department of Sericulture and Entomology, The National Institute of Agricultural Science & Technology, RDA) ;
  • Yoon, Hyung-Ju (Department of Sericulture and Entomology, The National Institute of Agricultural Science & Technology, RDA) ;
  • Lee, Myung-Ryul (Department of Sericulture and Entomology, The National Institute of Agricultural Science & Technology, RDA) ;
  • Chae, Young (Fruit Vegetable Breeding Lab. Department of Vegetable Breeding, The Natural Horicultural Research, RDA)
  • 발행 : 2003.12.01

초록

방울토마토에서 호박벌의 방화활동과 과도한 방화가 토마토 생산물에 미치는 영향을 조사한 결과 호박벌의 최대 방화활동시각은 08:00였으며, 한 개의 꽃을 방문하기 위하여 걸리는 시간은 평균 11.7초였다. 일벌의 1회 외역활동시 총 방화시간은 평균 41분 37초였으며 평균 195.2개의 꽃을 방문하였다. 평당 2마리의 일벌이 활동한 24시간 소문개방구에서 꽃에 체류하는 시간은 8.8$\pm$5.4초로, 평당 1마리 호박벌이 활동한 1시간 소문개방구에서 체류한 4.0$\pm$3.1초에 비해 두 배 이상 길었다. 1시간 소문개방구의 토마토 수술의 색깔은 대부분 갈색인 반면, 24시간 소문개방구는 잦은 방화에 의해 흑갈색으로 변하였다. 1시간 소문개방구의 토마토 4-6화방의 평균 착과율은 48.9%로서 24시간 소문개방구의 착과율 43.3%와 유의한 차이는 없었으나, 과실내 종자 수는 24시간 소문개방구가 64.0개로 1시간 개방구 55.3개에 비해 많았다. 1시간 소문개방구와 24시간 소문개방구간의 과중은 각각 25.4g과 24.4g,과실의 당도는 모두 5.1%로 차이가 인정되지 않았다(P>0.05). 이상의 결과로 볼 때 방울토마토의 경우 호박벌 일벌의 과도한 방화활동으로 인하여 생산물에 미치는 영향은 없는 것으로 조사되었다.

This study examined the foraging activities and the Influence of excessive foraging activity by B. ignitus workers on the quality of cherry-tomato fruits in cherry-tomato green-house. The peak time of pollination by B. ignitus worker was recorded at 8:00 and the average of foraging time on each flower was 11.7 secs. The total pollinating time of B. ignitus was 41 mins and 37 secs and its total number of visiting flowers was 195.2. The average time of staying on flowers was 8.8 ${\pm}$5.4 secs when two bumblebees were allowed to pollinate per Pyong (3.954 square yards) in the green house of tomatoes for 24 hours, but it was two times shorter (4.0${\pm}$3.1 secs) compared with that when one bumble-bee was allowed to pollinate per Pyong for one hour. The stamen color of tomato flowers visited by the bumblebee for one hour was brown while the stamen color for 24 hours was dark brown due to the frequent visiting. The average fruit bearing rate of the 4th-6th clusters of tomatoes visited for one hour was 48.9%, which was not significantly different from those allowed to visite for 24 hours. However, the number of seeds of flowers visited for 24 hours was 64.0, which was more than 55.3 seeds of flowers visited for one hour. The weight of fruit was 25.4 g and 24.4 g, respectively. The sweetness was not different significantly between one and 24 hours of visit (P > 0.05). The result revealed that end pro-duct of cherry-tomato was not influenced by over foraging activity of B. ignitus workers on tomato flowers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Albano, S., E. Salvado and J. Cadi rna. 2000. General pattern of bumblebee visits to tomato flowers in greenhouse condition. 43pp. Abstract book I.-XXI International Congress of Entomol Entomology, 298pp. Brazil
  2. Allen, T., S. Cameron, R. McGinley and B. Heinrich. 1978. The role of workers and new queens in ergonomics of a bumblebee colony (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 51: 329-342
  3. Batra, S.W.T. 1996. Bees and pollination in our changing environment. Honeybee Sci. 17: 67-70
  4. Choi, S.Y. 1987a. Studies on foraging activity of honey bees in the apple blossom (I). Kor. J. Apiculture 2: 93-100
  5. Darwin, C.R. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. 1st ed. 502pp. John Murray, London.
  6. Dogterom, M.H., J.A. Matteoni and R.C. Plowright. 1998. Pollination of greenhouse tomatoes by the North American Bombus vosnesenskii (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Entomol. Society of America 91: 71-75
  7. Dranstad, W.E. 1996. Do bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) really forage close to their nests? J. Insect Behav. 9: 163-182 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02213863
  8. Heinrich, B. 1979. Bumblebee economics (ed.). 250pp. Harvard University Press· Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England
  9. Iikeda, F. and Y. Tadauchi. 1995. Application of bumblebee as pollinators on fruit vegetables. Honeybee Sci. 16: 49-56
  10. Kim, C.H. 1995. Industrial insects (ed.). 204pp. Press of University of Kyungsang
  11. Kim, C.W. 1988. A systematic reexamination of the bumblebees and cuckoobees from Korea (Hymenoptera, Bombidae). National Academy of Sciences (Natural science) 27: 43-81
  12. Kim Y.S. and S.Y. Choi. 1988. Diurnal activity of the honeybees on the Blossoms of Tilia amurensis Rupr. Kor. J. Apicul. 3: IllS.
  13. Koidae, D. 1994. Effects of pollination and caution point by using of bumblebee in cherry-tomato cultivating house. Cultivation and Horticulture. 201pp
  14. Lee, S.B. and T.W. Bae. 1999. Foraging activities by bumblebee, Bombus terrestris S. (Hymenoptera, Apidae) at two cultivating types of cherry-tomato house. Korean J. Life Science II: 523-529
  15. Lee, S.B., S.E. Kim, M.R. Lee, H.J. Yoon, I.K. Park, J.W. Kim and T.W. Bae. 2001. Compare with foraging activities of Bombus ignitus and. B. terrestris in cherry-tomato cultivating house. Kor. J. Apicul. 16: 113-120
  16. Macheuura, M. 1993. Ecology and Application of bumblebees as pollinator-TV. Agricultural chemicals 40: 20-22.
  17. Mexia, A., E. Salvado and S. Alvano. 2000. Pollination of greenhouse tomato crop by bumblebees. 63pp. In Abstract book LXXI International Congress of Entomology, 298pp. Brazil
  18. Mosquin, T. 1971. Competition for pollinators as a stimulus for the evolution of flowering time. OIKOS 22: 398-402 https://doi.org/10.2307/3543864
  19. Ono, M. and T. Wada. 1996. The t urnblebee world-Biological foundation and application-. Japanese Plant protection Association. 132pp
  20. Plowright, R.C. and S.c. Jay. 1977. On the size determination of bumblebee castes (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Can. J. Zool., 55: 1133-1138 https://doi.org/10.1139/z77-146
  21. Pyke, G.H. 1978. Optimal body size in bumblebees. Oecologia (Berl.) 34: 255-266 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344905
  22. Ravestijn, W. van. and J. van der Sande. 1990. Use of bumblebees for the pollination of greenhouse tomatoes. pp. 204-209. In Acta Horticulturae 288. 6th Inter-national Symposium on Pollination. eds. by C. van Heemert and A. de Ruijter. 472pp. Tilburg, the Netherlands.
  23. $R\ddot{o}seler,$ P.F. 1985. A technical for year-round rearing of Bombus terrestris. (Apidae, Bombini)colonies in captivity. Apidologie 16: 165-170 https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:19850206
  24. Sutcliffe, G.H. and R.C. Plowright. 1990. The effects of pollen availability on development time of the bumblebee. Bombus terricola K. (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Can. J. Zool. 68: I120-1123 https://doi.org/10.1139/z90-166
  25. Wada, T. 1993. Pollination of fruit vegetables and fruit trees by bumblebee as new pollinator. Biological Industy 10: 22-28