KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE (한국작물학회지)

The Korean Society of Crop Science (한국작물학회)
권호 표지

Quality Characters and Identification of Breeding Materials in Malting Barley

맥주보리 품질 관련 형질과 고품질 육종소재 탐색

  • Published : 2003.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Germplasms and breeding lines of malting barley at National Yeongnam Agricultural Experiment Station (NYAES) were evaluated for malting barley quality improvement. Among the numerous malting barley quality parameters, the mean of protein content was 12.3% between 10.7% to 14.0% and range of the $\beta$-glucan content was from 3.5% to 5.8%, the mean was 4.6 percent. The length of acrospire, non-germination rate, friability, the speed of filtration, extract yield, kolbach index, diastatic power were significantly different between the individual varieties, however the other traits were not significantly different. The results of correlation analysis among 15 quality parameters showed significant positive correlation between crude protein content and malt protein content. However, other quality parameters such as sugar content, fiablity, extract yield, and kolbach index had negative correlation with crude protein content. Therefore, crude protein content could be one of the major factors that deteriorate quality. The varieties of Viva, Nishino-chikara, Kinukei 9, Kinukei 12, Sacheon 6 and Jinyangbori that showed over the 80% in extract yield and the higher diastatic power, will be used by crossing parents for improve the quality of malting barley.

국산 맥주보리의 품질향상을 위한 육종을 도모하기 위하여 농촌진흥청 영남농업시험장에서 보유하고 있는 맥주보리 유전자원 59품종 및 계통을 중심으로 원맥 및 맥아의 품질분석을 실시하여 품질이 우수한 자원을 선발하여 품질향상을 위한 육종소재로 이용할 목적으로 수행하였다. 1. 원맥의 단백질함량은 평균 12.3% (10.7-14.9%)를 나타내었으며, $\beta$-글루캔함량은 3.5-5.8%로 평균 4.6%였다. 2. 맥아신장도, 불발아율, Friability, 여과시간, 맥즙추출율, 콜박지수 및 효소력가는 품종간 유의 차가 인정되었으나, 그 밖의 형질은 차이가 없었다. 3. 15개 품질관련 형질간의 상관분석 결과, 원맥의 단백질 함량이 높을수록 맥아 단백질($0.800^{**}$)은 상대적으로 증가하지만, 당도(-$-0.578^{**}$). Friability($-0.554^{**}$), 맥즙추출율($-0.592^{**}$) 및 콜박지수($-0.681^{**}$)등은 낮아져 품질을 저하시키는 고도의 부의 상관이 인정되었다. 4. 맥아의 단백질함량이 높아짐에 따라서 추출을($-0.774^{**}$)과 콜박지수($-0.778^{**}$)가 현저하게 감소되는 등 품질저하의 원인이 되었다. 5. 본시험에서 추출율이 80% 이상이면서 콜박지수 및 효소력가 등 종합적으로 품질이 우수한 품종 및 계통은 외국품종으로서 Viva, Nishino chikara, Kinukei 9 및 Kinukei 12 의 4품종 및 계통과 국내육성 품종으로서 사천6호와 진양보리였다

Keywords

References

  1. American Society of Brewing Chemists. (ASBC). 1989. Methods of anatysis ofA.S.B.C., 6th edn
  2. Atzema, A.J. 1998. Determination of the quality offorecast moisture content of cereals at harvesting time using forecast weather ele-ments. Journal Agricuttural Engineering Research 71 : 119-125 https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0306
  3. Cho, J.H. Ha Y.W., Min, K.S. Kim, S.H. and Choi, C.H. 1996. Korea breedine history of malting bartey, OB beer co
  4. European Brewery Convention. (EBC). 1985. Proceedings of the 20th Congress
  5. Goblisch, C.A., R.D. Horsley and P.B. Schwarz, 1996. A strategy breed low-protein barley with acceptable kemel color and diastatic power. Crop Science 36 : 41-44 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600010007x
  6. Hong, M.Y, S.J. Suh, S.B. Back, M.S. Kang and K.Y. Park, 1998. Rapid detennination of barley B-glucan by NIRs (Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy). Korean Journal of Breeding 30(s): 74-75
  7. Jeong, H.S., S.Y. Lee, N.K. Park, H.S. Hur and Y.K. Min, 1998. Isolation and concentration technique of glucan for development of functional foods
  8. I. Screening and improvement of quantitative method of $\ss-glucan$ of barley and oats. RDA Journat of Aericutturat Science(Post Doc.) 40 : 81-87
  9. Kaukovirta-Norja, A., P. Peinikainen, J. Olkku and S. Laakso, 1997. Starsh lipids of barley and malt. Cereal Chemists 74(6): 733-738 https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.1997.74.6.733
  10. Lee, C.J., R.D. Horsley, F.A. Manthey and P.B. Schwarz, 1997. Comparisons of glucan content of barley and oat. Cereal Chemists 74(5): 571-575 https://doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM.1997.74.5.571
  11. Manzanares, P. and J.M. Sendra, 1996. Determination oftotal (1-3) (1-4)$-\ss-D-g1ucan$ in barley and malt flour samples. Journat of Cereat Science 23 : 293-296 https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.1996.0030
  12. McCleary, B.V. and G. Holmes, 1985. Enzymic qualification of(1-3) (1-4)$-\ss-Glucan$ in barley and malt. JournaI Inst. Brew. 91 : 285- 295 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2050-0416.1985.tb04345.x
  13. Oh, S.K., J.M. Ko, J.N. Hyeon and D.Y. Suh, 1999. Variation of malt quality among different sowing time in malting barley. Korean Journal Crop Science 44(App1.): 41-$42^a$
  14. Oh, S.K., S.J. Kweon, J.N. Hyeon, D.Y. Suh and Y.H. Kwack, 1999. Effects of malt quality among different protein in malting barley. Korean Journal of Breeding 31(App1.): $60-61^b$
  15. Oh, S.K., 1999. The method of quality progress and production on lowprotein and high quality in malting barley. The Research and Extention 40(8): 24-29
  16. Oh, S.K., J.N. Hyeon, T. Nagashima, D.Y. Suh, S.D. Kim and S.C. Kim, 2002. Studies on the brewing test by malt of common wheat. Plant Breeding Aspects of Genpomics(2002 Fatt Conference of the Korean Breedine Society): 112
  17. Oscarsson, M., R. Andersson, A.-C. Salomonsson and P. Aman, 1996. Chemical composition of barley samples focusing on dietary fiber components. Jouranl of Cereat Science 24 : 161-170
  18. Robert, J.A., G. Majsak-Newman, S.G. Ging and R.R. Selvendran, 1997. Solubilisation ofmixed linkage (1-3) (1-4)-D-glucans from barley : Effects of cooking and digestion. Journal of Cereal Sci-ence 25 : 275-283 https://doi.org/10.1006/jcrs.1996.0092
  19. Takeda, M., 1979. The method of quality analysis for variety development of malting barley. Tochigi Agricultural Experiment Station. pp : 1-64