보건교육건강증진학회지 (Korean Journal of Health Education and Promotion)

  • 제20권4호
  • /
  • Pages.51-65
  • /
  • 2003
  • /
  • 1229-4128(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2635-5302(eISSN)
한국보건교육건강증진학회 (Korean Society for Health Education and Promotion)
권호 표지

Korean Regional Mortality Differences According to Geographic Location

  • Lee, Sang-Gyu (Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health College of Medicine, Dankook University)
  • 발행 : 2003.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives： To examine the regional mortality differences in The Republic of Korea according to geographic location. Methods： All 232 administrative districts of the Republic of Korea in 1998 were studied according to their geographic locations by dividing each district into three categories； "metropolis," "urban," and "rural". Crude mortality rates for doth sexes from total deaths as well as the three major causes of death in Korea (cardiovascular disease, cancer, and external causes) were calculated with raw data from the "1998 report on the causes of death statistics" and resident registration data. Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) were calculated using the indirect standardization method. Poisson regression analyses were performed to examine the effects of geographic locations on the risk of death. To correct for the socioeconomic differences of each region, the percentage of old ($\geq$ 65 years old) population, the number of privately owned cars per 100 population, and per capita manufacturing production industries were included in the model. Results： Most SMRs were the lowest in the metropolis and the highest in the rural areas. These differences were more prominent in men and in deaths from external causes. In deaths from cancer in women, the rural region showed the lowest SMR. In Poisson regression analysis after correcting for regional socioeconomic differences, the risk of death from all causes significantly increased in both urban (OR＝1.111) and rural (OR＝1.100) regions, except for rural women, compared to the metropolis region. In men, the rural region showed higher risk (OR＝1.180) than the urban region (OR＝1.l51). For cardiovascular disease and cancer, significant differences were not found between geographic locations, except in urban women for cardiovascular disease (OR＝1.151) and in rural women for cancer (OR＝0.887), compared to metropolis women. In deaths from external causes, the risk ratios significantly increased in both urban and rural regions and an increasing tendency from the metropolis to the rural region was clearly observed in both sexes. Conclusions： Regional mortality differences according to geographic location exist in The Republic of Korea and further research and policy approaches to reduce these differences are needed. to reduce these differences are needed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abelin, T., Brzezinski, Z.J., and Carstairs, Y.D.L. 1987. Measurement in health promotion and protection. WHO. Regional Publications. European Series; No.22. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe
  2. Acheson, D. 1998. Independent inquiry into inequalities in health. London: The Stationary Office
  3. Bentham, G. 1984. Mortality rates in the more rural areas of England and Wales. Area 16:219-26
  4. Britton, M. 1990. Mortality and geography: a review in the mid-1980s England and Wales. London: Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. 2-3
  5. Britton, M., Fox, A., Goldblatt, P., Jones, K., and Rosato, M. 1990. The influences of socio- economic and environmental factors on geographic variation in mortality. In: Britton M.(ed) Mortality and geography: a review In the mid-1980s England and Wales. London: Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. 57-78
  6. Carstairs, V., and Morris, R. 1991. Deprivation and health in Scotland. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press
  7. Chung, H.K. 1991. A study on the impact of community-level characteristics on the mortality level. J Institute Health Environ Sci 1(1):17-50
  8. Curtis, S., and Jones, I.R. 1998. Is there a place for geography in the analysis of health inequality? Sociol Health Illness 20(5):645-72 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00123
  9. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. Available from http://www.health.gov/healthypeople/Document/tableofcontents.htm
  10. Fox, A., and Goldblatt, P. 1982. The longitudinal study: socio-demographic mortality differentials. OPCS Series L5.1. London: HMSO
  11. Gong, S.K., Im, J.K., and Kim, M.K. 1983. Trends of mortality and cause of death in Korea. Seoul: Korean Institute for Population and Health
  12. Han, S.H. 2001. A study of regional difference of death structure in Korea. Master's thesis, Seoul national university school of public health
  13. Janer, G., Sala, M., and Kogevinas, M. 2002. Health promotion trials at worksites and risk factors for cancer. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Environmental Health 28:141-157 https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.658
  14. Khang, Y.H., Lee, M.S., Lee, S.I, Jo, M.W., and Koo, H.J. 2002. Factors affecting death confirmation by physicians. Proceedings for 54th Annual Meeting of Korean Societyfor Preventive Medicine, 188
  15. Korean Statistical Office. 1998. Report on the cause of death statistics in 1997. Seoul: Korean Statistical Office
  16. Korean Statistical Office. 1999. Report on the cause of death statistics in 1998. Seoul: Korean Statistical Office
  17. Korean Statistical Office. 2000. Report on the cause of death statistics in 1999. Seoul: Korean Statistical Office
  18. McIntyre, S., and Ellaway, A. 2000. Ecological approaches: rediscovering the role of the physical and social environment. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I. (ed). Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press. 332-48
  19. Merzel, C., and Joanna, D. 2003. Reconsidering community-based health promotion: Promise, performance, and potential. Am J Pub Health 93(4): 557-574 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.93.4.557
  20. Peltomski, P. et al. 2003. Social context for workplace health promotion: feasibility considerations in Costa Rica, Finland, Germany, Spain and Sweden. Health Promotion International 18(2): 115-126 https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/18.2.115
  21. Picavet, H.S.J. 2002. Perspectives on health inequity. Journal of Epidemiology and community Health 56(1):80 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.56.1.80
  22. Scriven, A., and Orme, J. 1996. Health Promotion: Professional Perspectives. Basingstoke: Macmillan. 95-96
  23. Senior, M., Williams, H., and Higgs, G. 2000. Urban-rural mortality differentials: controlling for material deprivation. Soc Sci Med 51(2):289-305 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00454-2
  24. Shouls, S., Congdon, P., and Curtis, S. 1996. Modelling inequality in reported long term illness in the UK: combining individual and area characteristics. J Epidemiol Community Health 50(3): 366-76 https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.50.3.366
  25. Slokols, D. 1992. Establishing and Maintaining Healthy Environments: Toward a Social Ecology of Health Promotion. American Psychologist 47(1):6-22 https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.6
  26. World Health Organization. World Health Report 2000. Health Systems: Improving Performance. World Health Organization; 2000, Available from http:// www.who.int/whr/2000/en/report.htrn
  27. World Health Organization. 1992. ICD-10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. World Health Organization