Journal of Gifted/Talented Education (영재교육연구)

The Korean Society for the Gifted (한국영재학회)
권호 표지

Development of the Interdisciplinary - Multistrategic Science Education Program(IMSEP) for the Education of the Gifted in Science

과학 영재 교육을 위한 통합교과적-다중교수전략적 과학 교육 프로그램(Interdisciplinary - Multistrategic Science Education Program: IMSEP) 및 예시의 개발

  • Published : 2003.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Interdisciplinary-Multistrategic Science Education Program(IMSEP) is designed as an efficient program for the education of the gifted in science. An example of the contents is developed, which encompasses mathematics, physics, chemistry, astronomy, and biology. In the program, the complexity(interdisicplinarity) of scientific contents and instructional strategies used to deliver the scientific contents are designed to be correlated to each other in such a way that as the scientific contents gets more complex, the scientific skill to be taught by the instructional strategy becomes deeper. Through the careful balance between the scientific contents and the instructional strategies student's scientific knowledge and scientific skill will develop balanced and the effectiveness of science education will be maximized.

통합교과적-다중교수전략적 과학 교육 프로그램(Interdisciplinary -Multistrategic Science Education Program; IMSEP)이 과학영재들을 위한 효과적인 과학 교육 프로그램으로 고안, 개발되었다. 이 프로그램의 실제 예시로서 여러 가지 과학 교수 방법을 사용하여 수학, 물리, 화학, 천문학, 생물학을 통합한 예가 개발되었다. 이 프로그램에서는 과학적 지식의 복합성 또는 통합 교과성(complexity 또는 interdisciplinarity)이 커질수록 그것을 학습하는 과정에서 얻게 되는 학생들의 과학적 기술(scientific skill)도 깊어지도록 과학적 내용과 교수전략을 상호 연관시켰다. 이렇게 과학적 내용과 교수전략이 세심하게 균형을 이룬 IMSEP을 통해 과학 영재들의 과학적 지식과 기술은 균형 있게 발전할 것이며 따라서 과학 교육의 효과가 극대화 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Abrahamson, C. E. and Kimsey, W. D., (2002). General Education, interdisciplinary pedagogy and the process of content transformation. Education, 122, 587
  2. Jacobs, H. J., ed., (1989). Interdisciplinary Curriculum: Design and Implementation. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
  3. Clark, M. E. and Wawrytko, S. A., ed., (1990). Rethinking the Curriculum: Toward an Integrated, Interdisciplinary College Education. Green Wood Press, New York
  4. Beane, J. A., (1995). Curriculum integration and the disciplines of knowledge. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 616
  5. Erez, R, (2001). The Interrelationships Among Science, Art, and Values. journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13, 6 https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2001-364
  6. Sytsma, R. E., (2001). Changing States of Matter: Science, Education, and Giftedness in 21st Century High Schools. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12, 181 https://doi.org/10.4219/jsge-2001-658
  7. Renzulli, J. S., (1986). The Three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds), New York: Cambridge University Press, 53
  8. Clark, G. and Zimmerman, E., (2002). Nurturing the arts in programs for gifted and talented students. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 747
  9. Williams, S. M., (1992). Putting Case-Based Instruction Into Context: Examples From Legal and Medical Education. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 367 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0204_2
  10. Torp L. and Sage S., (2002). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-16 Education. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development
  11. Edens, K. M., (2000). Preparing Problem Solvers for the 21st Century through Problem-Based Learning. College Teaching, 48, 55 https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550009595813
  12. Hamm M. and Adams, D., (998). Literacy in Science, Technology, and the Language Arts: an Interdisciplinary Inquiry. Bergin & Garvey
  13. Lowery, L. F., (2002). Inquiry: the emphasis of a bold, new SCience curriculum. THE Journal, 21, 50
  14. Confrey, J., (1990). A review of the research on student conceptions in mathematics, science, and programming. In C. B. Cazdentlid.(Ed.), Review of Research in Education, Volume 16. Washigton, D.C.: American Education Research Association, 3.
  15. Iran-Nejad, A., (1995). Constructivism as substitute for memorization 10 learning: meaning is created by learner. Education, 116, 16
  16. Olsen, D. G., (1999). Constructivist Principles of Learning and Teaching Methods. Education. 120. 347