Journal of Gifted/Talented Education (영재교육연구)

The Korean Society for the Gifted (한국영재학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Relation of Science-gifted Student's Triarchic Intelligence, Thinking Styles and Academic Performance

과학영재의 학업성취에 대한 삼원지능과 사고양식의 영향 연구

  • Published : 2003.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study is to suggest the alternative to limits of intelligence focused on Psychometric tests. Through this study, it was found that triarchic theory of intelligence and thinking styles, which were suggested by Sternberg, were useful. The subjects are 122 student who are at three science-high-schools. The results show that the subjects preferred judicial, executive, and hierarchical rather than conservative styles of thinking, and they had strong analytical, creative, and practical ability. The correlation between academic achievement and triarchic intelligence except automation was significant. The difference of academic achievements was not significant by styles of thinking related to creativity and pattern of triarchic intelligence. There was no interaction between two variables as we expected. The practical ability illustrated the total academic performance very well. And executive, judicial thinking styles were prediction variable in case of considering with triarchic intelligence. Through the results, it could be suggested that triarchic intelligence and thinking styles of non cognitive concept could be important standard referred to selection for the science-gifted, and argued that the reform of the science-high-school was needed to produce the creative-productive science-gifted student.

본 연구는 영재의 특성을 심리측정적인 전통적인 지능에 의해서 밝혀온 것에 대한 한계성을 극복하기위한 대안으로서 스턴버그가 제안한 삼원지능과 사고양식의 유용성을 확인하였다. 이를 위해서 3개 과학 고등학교 2학년 122 명을 대상으로 스턴버그 이론을 국내에서 표준화 한 검사를 실시하였다. 연구결과 과학영재는 전반적으로 분석, 창의, 일상지능 모두 높은 패턴이 많이 표출되고 사법, 행정, 계층적 사고양식을 선호하며, 보수적 사고양식을 덜 선호한다. 과학영재의 전체 학업성취와 삼원지능은 자동화 영역을 제외하고 세 지능영역과 모두 유의한 상관이 있었고, 사법, 계층, 행정적 스타일과 유의한 상관이 있었다. 과학영재는 삼원지능의 패턴, 창의성과 관계되는 사고양식의 유무에 따라 학업성취와는 차이가 없었고, 성취에 대한 두 변인의 상호작용 역시 없었다. 전체 학업성취는 일상지능이 잘 설명하였다. 그리고 지능과 함께 고려할 경우에 행정, 사법적 사고양식이 예언변인이었다. 연구 결과를 통해서 과학영재의 선발과정에서 기존 지능검사를 확장한 삼원지능과 비 인지적 개념의 사고양식 구인이 과학영재 선발의 중요한 준거가 될 수 있음을 제안하였고, 창조적-생산적 과학영재를 양성하기 위하여 현재 국내 과학영재 교육의 근간을 이루는 과학 고등학교의 교육개혁이 절실히 요구됨이 논의되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 강영심(2002). 성공지능과 전통지능의 고등학생 학업성취도에 대한 예측력 비교. 교육심리연구, 16(4). 83-122
  2. 김소연(2000). Sternberg의 지능 및 사고양식 이론의 타당화. 숙명여자대학교 대학원 교육심리학과 석사학위 논문
  3. 박도순, 하대현, & 성태제(2000). 신 종합지능검사. 대한사립중고등학교장회
  4. 송선희(2000). Sternberg의 삼위일체 지능이론에 대한 고찰. 교육문제연구, 13(1)
  5. 윤미선(1998). 사고양식과 학업성취에 관한 연구- Sternberg의 정신자치제 이론을 중심으로- 고려대학교 대학원 교육학과 석사학위 논문
  6. 이군현(1990). 과학영재 학생에 대한 사례 연구. 교육학 연구, Vol. 28, 1, 131-144
  7. 이순묵(1999). 능력개념의 확장으로서 제시되는 실용지능: 개념의 타당화. 서울대학교 경영논집, 33, 410-430
  8. 황정규(1992). 지능종합검사 실시 요강. 서울 : 대한사립중고등학교장회
  9. Brandwein, P. F.(1985). The Gifted student as a Future Scientist. New York: Harcourt Branch Co
  10. Dai, D. Yun, & Feldhusen, J. F.(1999). A validation study of the thinking styles inventory:Implication for gifted education. Roeper Review, 21, 302-308 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199909553981
  11. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J.(1995). Thinking styles. In D. Saklofske & M.Zeidner (Eds.), International handbook of personality and intelligence (pp.205-230). New York: Plenum
  12. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J.(1997). Styles of thinking, abilities and academic performance. Exceptional Children, 63, 295-312 https://doi.org/10.1177/001440299706300301
  13. Herrnstein, R. & Murray, C.(1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press
  14. Ho, H. K.(1998). Assessing thinking styles in theory of mental self government: a minivalidity Study in a Hong Kong secondary school(Unpublished manuscript). Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong
  15. Marland, S. P.(1972). Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S Commissioner of Education. In Education of the gifted and talented, 1.Washington, DC: U.S . Government Printing Office
  16. Platow, J. A.(1984). A Handbook for Identifying the Gifted/Talented. Ventura Country Superintendent School Office
  17. Renzulli, J. S.(1978). What makes giftedness? a reexamination of the gifted and talented. Venturam CA: Office of the Superintendent of Ventura Country Schools
  18. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1993). Tacit knowledge, practical intelligence, general mental ability, and job knowledge, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 8-9
  19. Sternberg, R. J.(1981). Testing and cognitive psychology. American Psychologist, 36, 1181-1189 https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.10.1181
  20. Sternberg, R. J.(1982b). A Componential approach to intellectual development. In R. J. Sternberg(Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence(Vol. 1). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum
  21. Sternberg, R. J.(1985). Beyond IQ: A Triarchic Theory of Human Intelligence. NY: Cambridge University Press
  22. Sternberg, R. J.(1988). Mental self-government: A Theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197-224 https://doi.org/10.1159/000275810
  23. Sternberg, R. J.(1988a). A three-facet model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity(p. 125-147). New York: Viking
  24. Sternberg, R. J.(1988b). Mental Self-Government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197-224 https://doi.org/10.1159/000275810
  25. Sternberg, R. J.(1990). Thinking Styles: Keys to understanding student performance. Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 366-371
  26. Sternberg, R. J.(1992a). Toward better intelligence tests. In M. C. Wittrock(Ed.). Testing and cognition, (31-39). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
  27. Sternberg, R. J.(1994a). Thinking Styles: theory and assessment at the interface between intelligence and personality. In R. J. Sternberg & Patrica Ruzgis (Eds.). Personality And Intelligence. NY: Cambridge University Press
  28. Sternberg, R. J.(1994b). Allowing for Thinking Styles. Educational Leadership, 52, 36-40
  29. Sternberg, R. J.(1994c). A triarchic model for teaching and assessing students in general psychology. General Psychologist, 30, 42-48
  30. Sternberg, R. J.(1995). Styles of Thinking and Learning Language Testing, 12, 265-291
  31. Sternberg, R. J.(1995). Changing conceptions of intelligence and their impact upon the concept of giftedness: The triarchic theory of intelligence. In J. Genshaft M. Bireley, & C. L. Hollinger (Eds.), Serving gifted and talent students: A resource for school personnel(pp. 33-48). Austin, TX: Pro-ed
  32. Sternberg, R. J.(1996). What should we ask about intelligence? American Scholar, 65, 205-218
  33. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking Styles. NY: Cambridge University Press
  34. Sternberg, R. J.(1997b). What does it mean to be smart? Educational Leadership, 54(6), 20-24
  35. Stenberg, R. J.(1999). The theory of Successful intelligence. Review of General Psychology, 3, 292-316 https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.4.292
  36. Stenberg, R. J.(2000). Patterns of giftedness: A triarchic analysis. Roeper Review, 22, 231-236 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554044
  37. Sternberg, R. J. (Ed).(2000). Handbook of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press
  38. Sternberg, R. J.(1995a). Styles of Thinking and Learning. Language Testing, 12(3), 265-291 https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229501200302
  39. Sternberg, R. J., & Clinkenbeard, P. R.(1995). A triarchic model of identifying, teaching, and assessing gifted children. Roeper Review, 17, 255-260 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199509553677
  40. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E.(1982), The mind of the puzzler. Psychology Today, 16, June, 37-44
  41. Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E (1983), Insight in the gifted. Educational Psychologist, 18, 51-57 https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528309529261
  42. Sternberg, R. J., Ferrari, M., Clinkenbeard, P. R., & Grigorenko, E. L.(1996). Identification, instruction, and assessment of gifted children: A construct validation of a triarchic model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 40, 129-137 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629604000303
  43. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L(1993). Thinking styles and the gifted. Roeper Review, 16, 122-130 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199309553555
  44. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L(1995). Styles of thinking in the school. European Journal of high Ability, 6, 1-9
  45. Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. (2001). Intelligence applied(2nded.). New York: Oxford University Press
  46. Stenberg, R. J., Torff, B., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1998a). Teaching for successful intelligence raises school achievement. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 667-669
  47. Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K.(1991) MSG Thinking Styles Inventory Mannual. Unpublished manuscript
  48. Sternberg, R. J., & Wagner, R. K.(1993). The geocentric view of intelligence and job performance is wrong. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 1-5 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770441
  49. Sternberg, R. J., & Zhang, L. F. (Eds.).(2000). Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking styles. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
  50. Tannenbaum, A. J.(1979). Pre-Sputnik to post-Watergate concern about the gifted. In A. H. Passow(Ed), The gifted and talented. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education
  51. Terman, L.M.(1925). Genetic studies of genius. Vol. 1: Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
  52. Tso, S. M.(1998). Correlational study of thinking styles and academic achievement. A term paper submitted for a master's in Education degree course. The University of Hong Kong
  53. Wagner, R.K. & Sternberg, R. J.(1985). Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49:436-458 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.2.436
  54. Zhang, L. F.(1999). Further cross-cultural validation of the theory of mental self-government. Journal of Psychology Interdisciplinary & Applied, 133, 165-181 https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989909599731
  55. Zhang, L. F.(2001). Do styles of thinking matter among Hong Kong secondary school student? Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 289-301 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00136-7
  56. Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J.(1998). Thinking styles, abilities, and academic achievement among Hong Kong university students, Educational Research Journal, 13, 41-62