Sound parameters for classifying individual sows(Landrace×Yorkshire) during nursing behavior

수유행동시 모돈(랜드레이스×요크셔) 발성음의 개체 판별을 위한 음성 파라미터

  • Jeon, Jung-Hwan (Division of Applied Life Science. Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Chang, Hong-Hee (Division of Applied Life Science. Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Ha, Jeung-Key (Division of Applied Life Science. Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyeon-Hui (Institute of Animal medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Koo, Ja-Min (Institute of Animal medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyo-Jong (Institute of Animal medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Yeon, Seong-Chan (Institute of Animal medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 전중환 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부) ;
  • 장홍희 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부) ;
  • 하정기 (경상대학교 응용생명과학부) ;
  • 김현희 (경상대학교 동물의학연구소) ;
  • 구자민 (경상대학교 동물의학연구소) ;
  • 이효종 (경상대학교 동물의학연구소) ;
  • 연성찬 (경상대학교 동물의학연구소)
  • Accepted : 2003.02.06
  • Published : 2003.03.31

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to analyse grunts of the sows and to extract parameters from the time and frequency signals in nursing behavior. Five crossbred $Landrace{\times}Yorkshire$ sows were used on day 5 or 6 postpartum. The grunts and the behaviors of the five sows were recorded with five digital camcorders. Three parameter groups [Group I: Formant vector alone, Group II: Formant vector+parameters from time signal, Group III: Formant vector+parameters from time signal-parameters eliminated by stepwise discriminant analysis backward (SDAB)] with parameter vectors extracted from single grunts in the maximum grunting rate period were used for individuality of the sows. The parameter groups were compared by a discriminant function analysis. The classification system adopted in the Group II represented the higher discriniation rate than those in other groups (Group I: 63.3%, Group II: 83.0%, Group III: 80.0%). This study demonstrated that formant, intensity, and pitch were available sound parameters for individuality of the sows during nursing behavior.

Keywords

References

  1. Algers B, Nursing in pigs: Communicating needs anddistribution resources. J Anim Sci, 71:2826-2831, 1993
  2. Blackshaw JK, Jones DN, Thomas FJ. Vocal indivi-duality during suclding in the intensively housecl do-mestic pig. Appl Amin Behav, 50:33-41, 1996
  3. Jensen P, Algas B. An ethogram of piglet vocalizations during suckling. Appl Anim Ethol, 11: 237-248, 1984
  4. Kasanen S, Algas B. A note on the effects of additional sow gruntings on suckling behaviour in piglets. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 75:93-101, 2002
  5. Castem H, Algas B, Jensen P, et al. Suclding behavior and milk consumption in newbom piglets as a response to sow grunting. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 24:227-238, 1989
  6. Jensen P. Observation on the maternal behavior of free ranging domestic pigs. Appl Anim Behav Sci, 16:131- 142, 1986
  7. Schon PC, Puppe B, Gromyko T, et al. Common features and individual differences in nurse grunting of donaestic pigs(Sus Scrofa): A multi-parametric analysis. Behaviour, 136:49-66, 1999
  8. Shillito Qalser EE. Recognition of the sow's voice by neonatal piglets. Behaviour, 99:177-188, 1986
  9. White RG, DeShazer JA, Tiessler CJ, et aI. Vocalizaticn and physiological response of pigs during castration with or without a local anesthetic. J Anim Sci, 73:381-386, 1995
  10. Xin H, DeShazer JA, Leger DW. Kg vocalizatiais under selected husbandry practices. Transactions of the ASAE, 32:2181-2184, 1989