Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지

The Study on the Institutional Trend and Introduction of SEA in Korea

전략환경평가의 제도화 동향과 국내 도입 방안

  • Received : 2003.07.08
  • Accepted : 2003.07.14
  • Published : 2003.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment(ElA) in Korea has been used to improve environmental conservation and decision-making since environmental impact statement(EIS) was introduced in 1981 with the promulgation of the Environmental Preservation Act in 1977. which replaoed the Pollution Control Act legislated in 1%3. Together with a rapid growth of environmental perception as well as the diversification of development activities, however, it has recently bring about a strong demand for a new assessment process related to the strategic level of policies, plan, programs. In order to overcome such a limit in ElA system, Prior Environmental Review System(PERS) was introduced for assessment of administrative plans mainly concerned with development projects in 1993. In 1999. the regulations for PERS have been established by an amendment of the Basic Environmental Policy Act.Therefore the foundation of EIA system to integrate environmental concerns in planning processes and project works has been refonned. However the results of the execution of PERS were somewhat insuffident due to the institutional and technical matters. As the world's attention turns to sustainability and the considerations of cumulative effects, the concept of strategic envirorunental assessment(SEA) has taken on more significance and urgency and increasing number of countries and international organizations now undertake some form of SEA. The term SEA, however, is variously defined and understood, generally it means a formal process of systematic analysis of the envirorunental effects of development policies, plans, programmes and other proposed strategic actions. This process extends the aims and principles of EIA upstream in the decision-making process, beyond the project level and when major alternatives are still open. In this paper, we are discussing the significance of SEA and its relevance to EIA and the international trends and institutionalization of SEA. In conclusion we are discussing the comprehensive developing plan for SEA in Korea, then proposing a plan to make institutional arrangements for its application.

Keywords

References

  1. 경기개발연구원. 1995. 외국의 전략환경평가 제도에 관한 연구. 연구보고서 95-02
  2. 김명진. 1996. 환경정보체계를 이용한 환경영향평가 서울대학교 박사학위논문
  3. 김임순, 김윤신, 한상욱. 2003, 전략환경평가의 도입 및 관련제도의 정비방안에 관한 연구.한국 EHS 평가학회. 1(1). 128-195
  4. 김임순 외. 2002. 환경영향평가 교재의 내실화방안. 환경영향평가학회지 11(3)
  5. 김임순 외. 2003. 최선 환경영향평가. 도서출판 동화기술
  6. 김임순, 최원욱, 한상욱. 2003. 환경영향평가의 효율적 수행을 위한 역량구축과 전문자격제도 도입방안에 관한 연구. 아태환경 . 경영연구원
  7. 김임순, 한상욱. 2000. 지속성의 구현을 위한 환경영향평가 내실화 방안. 아태환경 . 경영연구원
  8. 김임순, 한상욱. 2001. 지속성의 구현을 위한 환경영향평가제도의 역할 제고방안. 아태환경 . 경영연구원
  9. 도명정. 2001. 서올시 도시개발관련볍제의 지속가능성 평가에 관한 연구. 서울시립대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  10. 성현찬. 1997. 전략환경평가 모형의 개발과 적용에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 박사학위논문
  11. 송영일. 2000. 전량환경평가 도입을 통한 사전환경성검토제도의 실효성 확보방안
  12. 아태환경 . 경영연구원. 1995. 미국의 환경영향평가. 도서출판 동화기술
  13. 정연만. 2001. 환경영향평가법의 체계정립에 관한연구. 환경영향평가화회지. 10(13)
  14. 제 16대 대통령 인수위원회. 2003.
  15. 지구환경대책기획단. 1992. 21세기 지구환경실천 강령
  16. 한국환경정책평가연구원. 2002, 사전환경성검토제도의 개선방안
  17. 한상욱. 1999. ' 사전협의제도 합리적 운영방안 모색' 을 위한 세미나. 한국환경기술인회
  18. 한상욱. 2000. 신제 환경영향평가론. 향문사
  19. 한상욱. 2001. 환경영향평가론. 도서출판 동화기술
  20. 환상욱. 2002. 환경영향평가론. 도서출판 동화기술
  21. 홍상표. 1997. 수질원 오염 취약성을 고려한 매립지 유해성 평가모형. 서울대학교 대학원 박사학위논문
  22. 환경부. 2000. 전략환경평가 기법개발 몇 중점평가 도입방안에 관한 연구
  23. ATSDR, 1998, Public Health Assessment Guidance Manual
  24. CEAA, IAIA, 1996, International Study of the Effectiveness of Environmental Assessment, final report
  25. CEQ 1997, The National Environmental Policy Act : A Study of its effectiveness after twenty-five years
  26. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, 2002, Communication from the commission on impact assessment
  27. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, 2000, Strategic Environmental Assessment in South Africa
  28. Environment Agency, Government of Japan, 1998, International Workshop on Strategic Environmental Assessment
  29. EPA. 1983. Guidelines for Performing Regulatory Impact Analysis
  30. European Commission. 2003. Environmental Impact Assessment, 23 June 2003 - Adoption of the 5 Years Report on the Application and Effectiveness of the EIA Directive (Directive 85/337/EEC as amended by Directive 97/11/EC)
  31. European Union, 1998, Interrelationship between IPPC EIA, SEVESO Directives and EMAS Regulation, Final report
  32. Government of India/ Asian Development Bank/ Escap, 1988, Training Workshop on Environmental Impact Assessment and Evaluation: Proceedings and Training Manual Volume I, II, 18-24
  33. H.Y.Wong, 2002, After SEA...What's next?, Conference on Reshaping Environmental Assessment Tools for Sustainability, 8-13 December 2002
  34. IAIA, 1999, Principles EIA best practice
  35. IAIA, 2002, The Linkage Between Impact Assessment and the Sustainable Development Agenda, and Recommendation for Actions
  36. IAIA, 2003a, Social Impact Assessment, International Principle
  37. IAIA, 2003b, Impact Assessment & Capacity Building(Abstract Volume)
  38. ICON, 2001, SEA and Integration of the Environment into Strategic Decision making, EC
  39. Imsoon Kim et al., 2002, The Study of Capacity Building and Professional Certificate system for effective EIA Capacity in Korea, 21st Annual Conference event of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Seoul, Korea
  40. Joe Weston, 1997, Planning and Environmental Impact Assessment in Practice
  41. Lee, N and Hughes, J, 1995, SEA Legislation and Procedures in the Community. EIA Center, Univ. of Manchester UK
  42. London(HMSO), 1991, Policy Appraisal and the Environment (A guide for government departments)
  43. Maria Rosario Partidario Ray Clark, 2000, Perspectives on Strategic Environmental Assessment
  44. OECD, 1995, Report of the OECD Workshop on Environmental Hazard / Risk Assessment, OECD Environmental Monographs, No. 105
  45. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 2002, Draft guidance on the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive
  46. Paulo C sar Gon alves Egler, 1998, Improving the Environmental Impact Assessment Process in Brazil(I)
  47. Paulo C sar Gon alves Egler, 1998, Improving the Environmental Impact Assessment Process in Brazil(II)
  48. Riki Therivel and Maria Rosario Partidario, 1996, The Practice of Strategic Environmental Assessment
  49. Sangwook Han, 2001, Current System of Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea, 21st Annual Conference event of the International Association for Impact Assessment, Seoul, Korea
  50. Sangwook Han, 2002, EIA for Sustainable Society in Korea, International Symposium for the 10th Anniversary of Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment, Seoul, Korea
  51. Study Group on Strategic Environmental Assessment, 2000, A Study to Introduce SEA System in Japan
  52. UK, 2002, Draft guidance on the Strategic Environmental Assessment Directive
  53. UNEP, 2002, EIA Training Resource Manual, 2nd edition, pp 494
  54. WHO EUROPE, 2001, Health Impact Assessment as part of strategic environmental assessment