Characteristics of Volatile Components from Magnolia ovobata Thunb. by Different Analysis Methods

  • Published : 2004.05.30


This study was carried out to establish an optimum method for identifying the volatile components of Magnolia ovobata Thunb. using the dynamic headspace (Purge & Trap) and simultaneous distillation and extraction (SDE) method. Between the two different identification analysis, the volatile components were more easily detected in the SDE than the Purge & Trap method. Among the identified volatile components, the 12 compounds were detected to have similar retention times and match quality within the 45 minutes in both identification methods. The maximum values of the major volatile components were detected differently by SDE and (Purge & Trap) method such as ${\alpha}-pinene$ (3.4, 18.2%), ${\beta}-pinene$ (3.5, 10.3%), l-limonene (5.2, 15.4%). These results indicated that the Dynamic Headspace (Purge & Trap) was much more reliable method for identifying the volatile components of Magnolia ovobata Thunb. as compared to the SDE method.


  1. Lee JG, Kwon Yj, Jang Hj, Kim OC, Choi YH (1997) Acomparison of different extraction methods for volatile components of Anise (Pimpinella anisum L.) Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology. Vol, 40(2), 144-147
  2. Hong CU, Kim CS, Kim NG, Kim YH (2001) Composition of essential oil of Tagetes minuta L. Korean J. Medicinal Crop Sci.,9(2) : 108-115
  3. Bae KH (2001) The medicinal plants of Korea. 3rd Edition Published by Kyohak Co. LTD
  4. Anonymous (2002) Fatty composition of Magnolia ovobata Thunb. Research Report on the Division of Industrial Crop, National Crop Experiment Station
  5. Kang KH, Roh BS, Seo JH, Heur WD (1998) Principal of Food Analysis. Published by SungKyunKwan University