Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genetic Differences within and between Populations of Korean Catfish (S. asotus) and Bullhead (P. fulvidraco) Analysed by RAPD-PCR

  • Yoon, Jong-Man (Department of Aquatic Life Medicine, College of Ocean Science and Technology, Kunsan National University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Yeon (Department of Marine Aquaculture and Biotechnology, College of Ocean Science and Technology, Kunsan National University)
  • Received : 2003.10.22
  • Accepted : 2004.03.03
  • Published : 2004.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Of the 20 arbitrarily chosen primers, six oligonucleotides decamer primers were used on the basis of the number of the polymorphisms generated in catfish (Silurus asotus) from Yesan and bullhead (Pseudobagrus fulvidraco) from Dangjin in Korea. Six primers were used generating a total of 602 scorable bands in catfish and 195 in bullhead population, respectively, ranging in size of DNA fragments from less than approximately 100 to larger than 2,000 base pairs (bp). Six primers yielded 199 polymorphic fragments (33.1%) in catfish and 47 (24%) in bullhead, respectively. In the present study, a total of 328 common fragments (an average of 54.7 per primer) were observed in catfish population, whereas 84 (an average of 14.0 per primer) in bullhead. The total number of specific fragments in catfish and bullhead population were 76 and 64, respectively. In catfish population, random decamer, OPA-17 (GACCGCTTGT) generated the highest number of fragments (a total of 141) in comparison with other primers used, with an average of 11.8. The common bands in the molecular weight of 300 bp generated by random primer OPA-06 (GGTCCCTGAC) were present in every individuals in bullhead population. The major polymorphic bands in the molecular weight of 100 bp generated by OPA-17 were identified in lane 14, 15, 17, 18, 19 20 and 21, which were identifying species in bullhead population. The average bandsharing values (BS values) of all of the samples within catfish population ranged from 0.575 to 0.945, whereas 0.063-1.000 within bullhead population. The bandsharing value (index of similarity between individuals) between individual No. 5 and No. 9 showed the highest level within catfish population, whereas the bandsharing value between individual No. 1 and No. 2 showed the lowest level. The single linkage cluster analysis resulted from four primers, indicating four genetic groupings composed of group 1 (C1-C10, all of the catfish samples), group 2 (B11, B12, B13, B14, B16, B17, B18, B19), group 3 (B15) and group 4 (B20 and B21). The dendrogram reveals close relationships between individual identities within two species populations and individuals derived from the same ancestor, respectively. However, genetic distances between two species populations ranged from 0.124 to 0.333. The shortest genetic distance (0.042) displaying significant molecular differences was between individual No. 6 and No. 9 catfish population. The shortest genetic distance (0.033) displaying significant molecular differences also was between individual No. 18 and No. 19 in bullhead population. Reversely, the genetic distance of individual No. 20/21 among individuals in bullhead population was highest (0.333). This result showed that bullhead No. 20 and 21 were distinct from other individuals within bullhead population.

Keywords

References

  1. Appannavar, M. M., M. G. Govindaiah and K. P. Ramesha. 2003. Genetic distance study among Deoni breed of cattle using random amplified DNA markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16 (3):315-319.
  2. Bommineni, V. R., P. P. Jauhar, T. S. Peterson, R. N. Chibbar and A. B. Almouslem. 1997. Analysis of hybrids of durum wheat with Thinopyrum juncelforme using RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:757-763.
  3. Callejas, C. and M. D. Ochando. 1998. Identification of Spanish barbel species using the RAPD technique. J. Fish Biol. 53:208-215.
  4. Debenham, P., M. Brzezinski, K. Foltz and S. Gaines. 2000. Genetic structure of populations of the red sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus franciscanus. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 253:49-62.
  5. Dias Neto, E., M. Steindel, L. K. F. Passos, C. Pereira de Souza, D. Rollinson, N. Katz, A. J. Romanha, S. D. J. Pena and A. J. G. Simpson. 1993. The use of RAPDs for the study of the genetic diversity of Schistosoma mansoni and Trypanosoma cruzi. DNA Fingerprinting: 339-345.
  6. Fischer, M., R. Husi, D. Prati, M. Peintinger, M. V. Kleunen and B. Schmid. 2000. RAPD variation among and within small and large populations of the rare clonal plant Ranunculus reptans (Ranunculaceae). Am. J. Botany 87 (8):1128-1137.
  7. Geng, S. M., W. Shen, G. Q. Qin, X. Wang, S. R. Hu, Q. Wang and J. Q. Zhang. 2002. DNA fingerprint polymorphism of 3-goat populations from China Chaidamu Basin. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15 (8):1076-1079.
  8. Hamm, D. E. and R. S. Burton. 2000. Population genetics of black abalone, Haliotis cracherodii, along the central California coast. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 254:235-247.
  9. Huang, B. X., R. Peakall and P. J. Hanna. 2000. Analysis of genetic structure of blacklip abalone (Haliotis rubra) populations using RAPD, minisatellite and microsatellite markers. Mar. Biol. 136:207-216.
  10. Iyengar, A., S. Piyapattanakorn, D. M. Dtone, D. A. Heipel and B. R. Howell, S. M. Baynes and N. Maclean. 2000. Identification of microsatellite repeats in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and dover sole (Solea solea) using a RAPD-based technique: Characterization of microsatellite markers in dover sole. Mar. Biotechnol. 2:49-56.
  11. Jeffreys, A. J. and D. B. Morton. 1987. DNA fingerprints of dogs and cats. Anim. Genet. 18:1-15.
  12. Johnson, S. L., C. Midson, E. W. Ballinger and J. H. Postlethwait. 1994. Identification of RAPD primers that reveal extensive polymorphisms between laboratory strains of zebrafish. Genomics 19:152-156.
  13. Kim, I. S. 1997. Illustrated Encyclopedia of Fauna & Flora of Korea. Academy Publishing Company. Korea, Seoul. pp. 187-190.
  14. Klinbunga, S., P. Ampayup, A. Tassanakajon, P. Jarayabhand and W. Yoosukh. 2000a. Development of species-specific markers of the tropical oyster (Crassostrea belcheri) in Thailand. Mar. Biotechnol. 2:476-484.
  15. Klinbunga, S., A. Boonyapakdee and B. Pratoomchat. 2000b. Genetic diversity and species-diagnostic markers of mud crabs (Genus Scylla) in Eastern Thailand determined by RAPD analysis. Mar. Biotechnol. 2:180-187.
  16. Liu, Z., P. Li, B. J. Argue and R. A. Dunham. 1998. Inheritance of RAPD markers in channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus), blue catfish (I. Furcatus) and their $F_{1}$,$F_{2}$ and backcross hybrids. Anim. Genet. 29:58-62.
  17. McCormack, G. C., R. Powell and B. Keegan. 2000. Comparative analysis of two populations of the brittle star Amphiura filiformis (Echinodermata: Ophiuroidae) with different life history strategies using RAPD markers. Mar. Biotechnol. 2:100-106.
  18. Moeller, D. A. and B. A. Schaal. 1999. Genetic relationships among native American maize accessions of the Great Plains assessed by RAPDs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 99:1061-1067.
  19. Mohd-Azmi, M., A. S. Ali and W. K. Kheng. 2000. DNA fingerprinting of red jungle fowl, village chicken and broilers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13 (8):1040-1043.
  20. Nebauer, S. G., L. del Castillo-Agudo and J. Segura. 2000. An assessment of genetic relationships within the genus Digitalis based on PCR-generated RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:1209-1216.
  21. Nei, M. and W. Li. 1979. Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:5269-5273.
  22. Orozco-Castillo, C., K. J. Chalmers, R. Waugh and W. Powell. 1994. Detection of genetic diversity and selective gene introgression in coffee using RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87:934-940.
  23. Partis, L. and R. J. Wells. 1996. Identification of fish species using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Mol. Cell. Probes. 10:435-441.
  24. Pejic, I., P. Ajmone-Marsan, M. Morgante, V. Kozumplick, P. Castiglioni, G. Taramino and M. Motto. 1994. Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs and AFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:1248-1255.
  25. Ramesha, K. P., T. Saravanan, M. K. Rao, M. M. Appannavar and A. Obi Reddy. 2002. Genetic distance among south Indian breeds of zebu cattle uing random amplified DNA markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15(3):309-314.
  26. Smith, P. J., P. G. Benson and S. M. McVeagh. 1997. A comparison of three genetic methods used for stock discriminaion of orange roughy, Hoplostethus atlanticus: allozymes, mitochondrial DNA, and random amplified polymorphic DNA. Fish. Bull. 95:800-811.
  27. Spooner, D. M., M. L. Ugarte and P. W. Skroch. 1997. Species boundaries and interrelationships of two closely related sympatric diploid wild potato species, Solanum astleyi and S. boliviense, based on RAPDs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:764-771.
  28. Tassanakajon, A., S. Pongsomboon, P. Jarayabhand, S. Klinbunga and V. Boonsaeng. 1998. Genetic structure in wild populations of black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. J. Mar. Biotechnol. 6:249-254.
  29. Vierling, R. A., Z. Xiang, C. P. Joshi, M. L. Gilbert and H. T. Nguyen. 1994. Genetic diversity among elite Sorghum lines revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms and random amplified polymorphic DNAs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 87:816-820.
  30. Welsh, J., C. Petersen and M. McClelland. 1991. Polymorphisms generated by arbitrarily primed PCR in the mouse: application to strain identification and genetic mapping. Nucleic Acids Res. 19(2):303-306.
  31. Yoon, J. M. 2001. Genetic similarity and difference between common carp and Israeli carp (Cyprinus carpio) based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs analyses. Kor. J. Biol. Sci. 5:333-339. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265071.2001.9647624
  32. Yoon, J. M. and H. Y. Park. 2002. Genetic similarity and variation in the cultured and wild crucian carp (Carassius carassius) estimated with random amplified polymorphic DNA. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15 (4):470-476.

Cited by

  1. Geographic Variations and Genetic Distance of Three Geographic Cyclina Clam (Cyclina sinensis Gmelin) Populations from the Yellow Sea vol.16, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2012.16.4.315
  2. Genetic Differences of Three Pollicipes mitella Populations Identified by PCR Analysis vol.17, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2013.17.3.199
  3. Genetic Variations between Hairtail (Trichiurus lepturus) Populations from Korea and China vol.17, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2013.17.4.363
  4. Geographic Variations of Three Fulvia mutica Populations vol.29, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9710/kjm.2013.29.3.163
  5. Genetic Distances of Three Mollusk Species Investigated by PCR Analysis vol.18, pp.1, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2014.18.1.043
  6. Genetic Distances of Three White Clam (Meretrix lusoria) Populations Investigated by PCR Analysis vol.18, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2014.18.2.089
  7. Genetic Distances and Variations of Three Geographic Hairtail Populations Identified by PCR Analysis vol.18, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2014.18.3.167
  8. Genetic Distances and Variations of Three Clupeid Species Determined by PCR Technique vol.18, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.12717/DR.2014.18.4.287
  9. Genetic distances of three venerid species identified by PCR analysis vol.31, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9710/kjm.2015.31.4.257
  10. Studies on Genetic Variation of Different Chinese Duck Populations with Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Analysis vol.19, pp.4, 2004, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.475
  11. 붕어(Carassius auratus Linnaeus)와 떡붕어(C. cuvieri Temminck and Schlegel)의 유전적 비교 vol.48, pp.5, 2004, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2006.48.5.637
  12. Genetic Distances of Crucian Carp Populations analyzed by PCR Approach vol.20, pp.2, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12717/dr.2016.20.2.135
  13. Genetic Distances of Crucian Carp Populations analyzed by PCR Approach vol.20, pp.2, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12717/dr.2016.20.2.157
  14. Genetic Distances in Three Ascidian Species determined by PCR Technique vol.20, pp.4, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12717/dr.2016.20.4.379
  15. Genetic Variations of Three Tegillarca granosa Populations Investigated by PCR Technique vol.32, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.9710/kjm.2016.32.4.255
  16. Euclidean Genetic Distances of Four Manila Clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) Populations analyzed by PCR Research vol.21, pp.3, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12717/dr.2017.21.3.269
  17. Genetic Distances of Scallop (Chlamys farreri) Populations investigated by PCR Procedure vol.21, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12717/dr.2017.21.4.435
  18. Genetic Distances in Two Gracilaria Species (Gracilariaceae, Rhodophyta) Identified by PCR Technique vol.22, pp.4, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12717/dr.2018.22.4.393
  19. Genetic Distances between Two Cultured Penaeid Shrimp (Penaeus chinensis) Populations Determined by PCR Analysis vol.23, pp.2, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12717/dr.2019.23.2.193
  20. Genetic Distances Within-Population and Between-Population of Tonguesole, Cynoglossus spp. Identified by PCR Technique vol.23, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12717/dr.2019.23.3.297
  21. Genetic Distances of Rainbow Trout and Masu Salmon as Determined by PCR-Based Analysis vol.24, pp.3, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12717/dr.2020.24.3.241
  22. Genetic Distances between Tailfin Anchovy (Coilia nasus) Populations Analyzed by PCR vol.25, pp.1, 2004, https://doi.org/10.12717/dr.2021.25.1.59