Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS ABOUT MICROLEAKAGE OF ALL-IN-ONE ADHESIVES

올인원 접착제의 미세누출에 관한 정량적 분석

  • Kang, Yong-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Shin, Soo-Il (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Shin, Dong-Hoon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 강용희 (단국대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 신수일 (단국대학교 치과대학 보존학교실) ;
  • 신동훈 (단국대학교 치과대학 보존학교실)
  • Published : 2004.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

All-in-one adhesives were recently developed for reducing the technique sensitivity and chair time, but lots of concerns were made on bondability, longevity, and microleakage. The object of this study was to evaluate microleakage and marginal quality of all-in-one adhesives using electrochemical method and SEM analysis quantitatively. After making Class V cavities, they were bulk filled with Heliomolar(#A1 after surface treatment with three adhesives: Adper Prompt (Group A), One up bond F (Group O), Xeno III (Group X) Electrical conductivity (microamphere, ${\mu}A$) was checked two times: before and after cavity filling. Percentage of leaky margin was estimated from SEM image (${\times}1,000$). The data were statistically analysed: ANOVA and Paired T test for electrical conductivity, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney test for marginal quality, Spearman s rho test for checking of relationships between 2 methods. The result were as follows: 1. There was no difference in microleakage between adhesive systems and every specimen showed some of microleakage after filling. 2. Microleakage was reduced about 70% with composite resin filling. 3. Marginal quality was the best in group A. decreasing among groups in the following order: group O, followed by group X. There were significant differences between group A and group X (p=0.015), and between group 0 and group X (p=0.019). 4. There was no relationship between the microleakage measured by electrochemical method and marginal quality measured by SEM analysis. Within the results of this study, there was no difference in microleakage among groups by electrical conductivity. However, significant difference in marginal quality was seen among groups. It was believed that these dissimilar results might be induced because of their own characteristics. Analysis of microleakage needs various methods for accuracy.

Keywords

References

  1. Bowen RL. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. IV. Bonding to dentin, enamel, and fluorapatite improved by the use of a surface active comonomer. J Dent Res 44(5) :906 911, 1965 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345650440052601
  2. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine perrmeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent 25(5) :355 372, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00057-7
  3. Van Meerbeek B, lnokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological aspects of the resin dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 71(8): 1530 1540, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710081301
  4. Van Meerbeek B. Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 73(11):1690 1702, 1994
  5. Manhart J. Chen HY. Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R Bond strength of a compomer to dentin under various surface conditions， Clin Oral Investig 3(4) :175 180 1999 https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840050098
  6. Farik B, Munksgaard EC, Suh BI. Andreasen JO, Kreiborg S. Adhesive bonding of fractured anterior teeth: effect of wet technique and rewetting agent. Am J Dent 11(6) :251 253, 1998
  7. Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore BK. Effect of operator variability on dentin bond strength of two step bonding systems. Am J Dent 13(2):101 104, 2000
  8. Gale MS, Darvell BW, Cheeung GS. Three dimensional reconstruction of microleakage pattern using a sequential grinding technique. J Dent 22(6):370 375, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90091-4
  9. Crim GA, Chapman KW. Reducing microleakage in Class II restoration:an in vitro study. Quintessence Int 25(11): 781 785, 1994
  10. Osins BA, Carter JM, Shih Levine M. Microleakage of four root canal sealer cements as determined by an electrochemical technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 56(1):80 88, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(83)90060-9
  11. Sakoolnamarka R, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Interfacial micromorphology of three adhesive systems created in caries affected dentin. Am J Dent 16(3):202 206, 2003
  12. Somphone P, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Enhanced bond strengths of compomers using two dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 15(5):325 329, 2002
  13. Kubo S, Li H, Burrow MF, Tvas MJ. Nanoleakage of dentin adhesive systems bonded to Carisolv treated dentin. Oper Dent 27(4) :387 395, 2002
  14. Perdigao J, May KN Jr. Wilder AD Jr. Lopes M. The effect of depth of dentin demineralization on bond strengths and morphology of the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 25(3):186 194, 2000
  15. Phrukkanon S, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. The effect dentine location and tubule orientation on the bond strengths between resin and dentine. J Dent 27(4): 265 274, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00060-8
  16. Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH. Resin infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent23(4): 185 194, 1998
  17. Kemp Scholte CM, Davidson CL. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 69(6): 1240 1243, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690060301
  18. Jacobsen PH, Von Fraunhofer JA. Assessment of microleakage using a conductimetric technique. J Dent Res 54(1):41 48, 1975 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345750540013401
  19. Jacobson SM, von Fraunhofer JA. The investigation of microleakage in root canal therapy. An electrochemical technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 42(6):817 823, 1976 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(76)90105-5
  20. Mattison GD, von Fraunhofer JA. Electrochemical microleakage study of endodontic sealer/cements. Pral Surg Pral Med Oral Pathol 55(4):402 407, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(83)90195-0
  21. Iwami Y, Yamamoto H, Ebisu S. A new electrical method for detecting marginal leakage of in vitro resin restorations. J Dent 28(4):241 247, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5748(99)00079-9
  22. Pradelle Plasse N, Wenger F, Colon P. Effect of conditioners on dentin permeability using an impedance method. J Dent 30(5 6):251 257, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00042-8
  23. Nakano Y. A New eletrical testing method on marginal leakage of composite resin restoration. Jpn J cons Dent 28(4):1183 1198, 1985
  24. Delivanis PD, Chapman KA. Comparison and reliability of techniques for measuring leakage and marginal penetration Oral Surg Pral Med Pral Pathol 53(4):410 416, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(82)90444-3
  25. von Fraunhofer JA, Adachi EI, Barnes DM, Romberg E. The effect of tooth preparation on microleakage behavior. Oper dent 25(6):526 533, 2000
  26. Alhadainy HA, Elsaed HY, Elbaghdady YM. An electrochemical study of the sealing ability of different restrofilling materials. J Endod 19(10):508 511, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81492-5
  27. Jacquot BM, Panighi MM, Steinmetz P, G'sell C. Evaluation of Temporary restorations' microleakage by means of electrochemical impedance measurements. J Endod 22(11):586 589, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(96)80026-4
  28. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Cinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth coloured inlay systems at 3 years. J Dent 23(6): 329 338, 1995
  29. Roulet JF. Marginal integrity: clinical significance. J Dent 22 suppl 1:SP 12. Review, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90033-7
  30. Manhart J. Chen HY, Mehl A, Weber K, Hickel R. Marginal quality and miacroleakage of adhesice class V restorations. J Dent 29(2):123 130, 2001
  31. Gallo JR 3rd, Bates ML, Burgess JO. Microleakage and adaptation of Class II packable resin based composites using incremental or bulk filling techniques. Am J Dent 13(4):205 208, 2000
  32. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vangerle G. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials. Am J Dent 14(3):170 176 2001
  33. Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Losche GM, Roulet J. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine. J Dent 28(6):399 405, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00022-1
  34. Barnes DM, Thompson VP, Blank LW, McDonald NJ. Microleakage of Class 5 composite resin restorations: a comparison between in vivo and in vitro. Oper Dent 18(6):237 245, 1993
  35. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo and in vitro Class II composite restorations. J Dent 21(3): 158 162, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90026-M
  36. Ferrari M, Yamamoto K, Vichi A, Finger WJ. Clinical and laboratory ecaluation of adhesice restorative systems. Am J Dent 7(4):217 219, 1994
  37. Momoi Y, Lwase H, Nakano Y, Kohno A, Asanuma A, Yanagisawa K. Gradual increases in marginal leakage of resin composite restorations with thermal stress. J Dent Res 69(10):1659 1663, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690100601