Blood Urea Nitrogen and Body Condition Score on Reproductive Efficiency in Korean Cattle

한우 번식효율에 대한 Blood Urea Nitrogen과 Body Condition Score의 영향

  • 정영훈 (농촌진흥청 축산연구소 한우시험장) ;
  • 이명식 (농촌진흥청 축산연구소 한우시험) ;
  • 전기준 (농촌진흥청 축산연구소 한우시험) ;
  • 장선식 (농촌진흥청 축산연구소 한우시험) ;
  • 서국현 (농촌진흥청 축산연구소 한우시험) ;
  • 박정준 (농촌진흥청 축산연구소 한우시험) ;
  • 이창우 (농촌진흥청 축산연구소 한우시험) ;
  • 나기준 (농촌진흥청 축산연구소 한우시험) ;
  • 노규진 (경상대학교 수의과대학 동물의학연구소)
  • Published : 2004.04.01

Abstract

The environmental impact of nutrient waste from agriculture has become an area of concern as ways to produce more food and of offspring. In dairy cattle, as the genetic capacity for milk production has increased, decreased fertility has become a severe problem by feeding high dietary protein, resulting in high concentration of blood urea nitrogen (BUN). There are numerous reports on BUN which is associated with reduced conception rates and closely related to body condition score (BCS) in lactating cattle, but not in Korean native cattle. This study was therefore performed to investigate the relation of BUN to both BCS and conception rates in Korean cattle. A total of 400 female Korean cattle (2∼5 years) in Daewanryong were used for this experiment. Feeding condition divided into two groups depending on grazing and darn feeding period. In grazing period, the mixture of Timothy, Orchard grass and Tall fescue, and concentrates (2.5 kg/day) was fed whereas hay (6.5 kg/day) and corn silage (20 kg/day) were fed while barn feeding period. Average BUN concentration at grazing and barn feeding were 7.39$\pm$2.65 mg/㎗ and 12.36$\pm$2.92 mg/㎗, respectively. During grazing period, high rates of pregnancy showed at 4∼8 mg/㎗ BUN concentration. In barn feeding period, 66%, of cattle were in pregnant at 8∼l4 mg/㎗ BUN concentration. The BCS for obtaining high rate of pregnancy raged at 2.5∼3.5. However, BUN did not directly relate to BCS in Korean cattle.

본 실험은 한우 400두를 공시하여 사양조건에 따른 blood urea nitrogen(BUN)의 농도가 암소의 번식에 미치는 영향을 조사하였으며 또한 body condition score(BCS)가 번식효율에 미치는 영향을 조사하였다. 1 화본과 식물이 주종인 초지에서 방목을 하였을 때 BUN의 평균농도는 7.39$\pm$2.65 mg/㎗ 이었으며 발정이 육안적으로 확인된 암소의 58.2%가 4∼8 mg/㎗ 사이에 분포하였으며 수태율도 높은 경향을 보였다. 2.사사기 농후사료를 급여하였을 때 BUN의 평균 농도는 12.36$\pm$2.92 mg/㎗이었으며 8∼14 mg/㎗사이에서 높은 수태율을 보였다. 3. BCS가 2.5∼3.5사이에 있을 때 분만 후 발정재귀가 가장 빠르게 나타났으며 수태율도 높은 경향을 나타내었다. 4. 방목기, 사사기에서 BUN과 BCS상호간의 다소의 차이는 있었으나 유의성은 인정되지 않았다. 이상의 결과를 종합해 보면 사양조건에 따라 적정 BUN및 BCS의 수준을 유지할 때 번식의 효율을 증대시킬 수 있을 것이라 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bastidas P, Forrest DW, Del Vecchio RP and Randel RD. 1990. Biological and immunological luteinzing hormone activity and blood metabolites in postpartum Brahman cows. J. Anim. Sci., 68: 2771-2778 https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.6892771x
  2. Bellow RA and Short RE. 1978. Effect of precalving feed level on birth weight, calving difficulty and subsequent fertility. J. Anim. Sci., 46:1522-1529 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1978.4661522x
  3. Butler WR, Calaman JJ and Beam SW. 1996. Plasma and milk urea nitrogen in relation to pregnancy rate in lactating dairy cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 74:858-865 https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.744858x
  4. Carroll DJ, Barten BA, Anderson GW and Smith RD. 1988. Influence of protein intake and feeding strategy on reproductive performance of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 71:3470-3478 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79953-1
  5. Domecq JJ, Skidmore AL, Lloyd JW and Kaneene JB. 1997. Relationship between body condition scores and conception at first artificial insemination in a large dairy herd of high yielding Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci., 80:113-120 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)75918-6
  6. Ducker MJ, Morant SV, Fisher WJ and Haggett RA. 1985. Nutrition and reproductive performance of dairy cattle. 2. Prediction of reproductive performance in first lactation dairy heifers subjects to controlled nutritional regimens. Anim. Prod., 41:13-19 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100017505
  7. Dunn TG, Ingalls JE, Zimmerman DR and Wiltbank JN. 1969. Reproductive performance of 2 year-old Hereford and Angus heifers as influenced by pre- and post-calving energy intake. J. Anim. Sci., 29:719-726 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1969.295719x
  8. Edwards JS, Bartley EE and Dayton AD. 1980. Effects of dietary protein concentration on lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci., 63:243-251 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82920-1
  9. Elrod CC and Butler WR. 1993. Reduction of fertility and alteration of uterine pH in heifers fed excess ruminally degradable protein. J. Dairy Sci., 71:694-701
  10. Ferguson JD, Galligan DT, Balanchard T and Reeves N. 1993. Serum urea nitrogen and conception rate : The usefulness of test information. J. Dairy Sci., 76:3742-3746 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77716-4
  11. Folman Y, Newmark H, Kaim M and Kaufmann W. 1981. Performance, rumen, and blood metabolites in high yielding cows fed varying protein percents and protected soybean. J. Dairy Sci., 64:759-767 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(81)82645-8
  12. Hand RK, Gould SR, Basarab JA and Engstrom DF. 1986. Condition score, body weight and hip height as predictors of gain in various breed crosses of yearling steers on pasture. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 66:837-842 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas86-093
  13. Herd DB and Sprott LR. 1986. Body condition, nutrition and reproduction of beef cows. Texas Agricultural Extention Service Bulletin., B-1526
  14. Jordan ER and Swanson LV. 1979. Effect of crude protein on reproductive efficiency, serum total protein, and albumin in the high-producing dairy cow. J. Dairy Sci., 62:58-64 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(79)83202-6
  15. Kauffman AJ and St-Pierre NR. 2001. The relationship of milk urea nitrogen to urine nitrogen excretion in Holstein and Jersey cows. J. Dairy Sci., 84:2284-2294 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74675-9
  16. Kim IH and Suh GH. 2003. Effect of the amount of body condition loss from the dry to near calving periods on the subsequent body condition change, occurrence of postpartum disease, metabolic parameters and reproductive performance in Holstein dairy cows. Theriogenology, 60:1445-1456 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(03)00135-3
  17. Klosterman EW, Sanford LG and Parker CF. 1968. Effect of cow size and condition and ration protein content upon maintenance requirments of mature beef cows. J. Anim. Sci., 27:242-246 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1968.271242x
  18. Odde KG. 1997. Reproductive efficiency precalving nutrition and improving calf survival. Proc. Bovine Connection, 86-92
  19. Paputungan U and Markarechian M. 2000. The influence of dam weight, body condition and udder scores on calf birth weight and preweaning growth rates in beef cattle. Asian American Journalists Association, 13 (4):435-439
  20. SAS, 1990, SAS/STAT User's guide vol 2. SAS institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA
  21. Sonderman JP and Larson LL. 1989. Effects of dietary protein and exogenous Gonadotropinreleasing hormone on circulating progesterone concentrations and performance of Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci., 72:2179-2183 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79343-7
  22. Wiltbank JN, Rowden WW, Ingalls JE, Gregory KE and Koch RM. 1962. Effect of energy level on reproductive phenomera of masture Hereford cows. J. Anim. Sci., 21:219-226 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1962.212219x
  23. 문진산, 주이석, 장금찬, 윤용덕, 이보균, 박용호, 손창호. 2000, 젖소에서 유성분 분석을 통한 영양상태 평가 및 건강관리에 관한 연구. 고능력 위주의 대규모 목장에서 우유 중 단백질과 요소태질소 수준이 수태율에 미치는 영향. 대한수의학회지, 40:383-391
  24. 박수봉, 김현섭, 김창근, 정영채, 이종완, 김천호. 1997. 젖소의 수태율과 요소태 질소의 관계. 한국가축번식학회지, 21:185-189
  25. 박수봉, 김현섭, 이명식, 박진기, 장원경, 이정규. 1997. 우유내 요소태 질소 농도와 관련된 우군의 번식성. 한국가축번식학회지, 21:191-195
  26. 백광수, 성환후, 고응규, 이명식, 류일선, 강희설, 조원모, 신기준. 1997. 한우 암소의 번식장애에 관한 조사 연구. 한국가축번식학회지, 21:411-421
  27. 양부근, 김종복, 정희태, 박춘근, 김정익, 황환섭, 김현철. 1999. 저수태 한우와 번식장애 한우의 혈액 화학치 및 호르몬 분석, 한국가축번식학회지, 23:175-180