Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

IN VITRO MICRO-SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF FIVE COMPOSITE RESINS TO DENTIN WITH FIVE DIFFERENT DENTIN ADHESIVES

미세-전단 결합 강도 시험을 이용한 상아질 접착제와 수복용 복합 레진의 호환성에 관한 연구

  • Chung, Jin-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Roh, Byoung-Duck (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 정진호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 노병덕 (연세대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2004.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare and to evaluate the combination use of 5 kinds of dentin adhesive systems and 5 kinds of composite resins using micro-shear bond test. Five adhesive systems (Prime & Bond NT (PBN). Onecoat bond (OC), Excite (EX), Syntac (SY), Clearfil SE bond (CS)) and five composite resins (Spectrum (SP), Synergy Compact (SC), Tetric Ceram (TC), Clearfil AP-X (CA), Z100 (Z1)) were used for this study ($5{\;}{\times}{\;}5{\;}={\;}25group$, n =14/group). The slices of horizontally sectioned human tooth were bonded with each bonding system and each composite resin, and tested by a micro-shear bond strength test. These results were analyzed statistically. The mean micro-shear bond strength of dentin adhesive systems were in order of CS (22.642 MPa), SY (18.368 MPa), EX (14.599 MPa). OC (13.702 MPa). PBN (12.762 MPa). The mean bond strength of self-etching primer system group (CS, SY) in dentin was higher than that of self-priming adhesive system groups (PBN, EX, OC) significantly (P<0.05). The mean bond strength of composite resins was in order of SP (19.008 MPa), CA (17.532 MPa). SC (15.787 MPa), TC (15.068 MPa). Z1 (14.678 MPa). Micro-shear bond strength of SP was stronger than those of other composite resins significantly (P < 0.05). And those of TC and Z1 were weaker than other composite resins significantly (P < 0.05). No difference was found in micro-shear bond strength of composite resin in self-etching primer adhesive system groups (CS, SY) statistically. However, there was significant difference of micro-shear bond strength of composite resin groups in self-priming adhesive systems group (PBN, EX, OC). The combination of composite resin and dentin adhesive system recommended by manufacturer did not represent positive correlation. It didn't seem to be a significant factor.

Keywords

References

  1. Buonocore MG, Rochester NY. Principle of adhesive retention and adhesive restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 67:382-391. 1963 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1963.0301
  2. Asmussen E. Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA, BisGMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater 14:51-56, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00010-4
  3. Kugel G, Ferrari M. The Science of bonding From first to sixth generation. J Am Dent Assoc 131(June) : 20-25, 2000 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2000.0398
  4. Gallo JR, Comeaux R, Haines B, Xu X, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength of four filled dentin bonding systerns. Oper Dent 26:44-47, 2001
  5. Fanning DE. Effect of a filled adhesive on bond strength in three dentianl bonding system. General Dentistry 43(3):256-262, 1995
  6. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Matthews WG, Pashley D. Nanoleakage : Leakage within the Hybrid Layer. Oper Dent 20:18-25, 1995
  7. Li H. Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage patterns of four dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 16:48-56, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00085-8
  8. Miyazaki M, Hinoura K, Onose H. Moore BK. Effect of filler content of light-cured composites on bond strength to bovine dentine. J Dent 19:301-303, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(91)90078-D
  9. Asmussen E. Factors affecting the quantity of remaining double bonds in restorative resin polymers. Scand J Dent Res 90:490-496, 1982
  10. Ferracane JL. Status of Research on New Fillers and New resins for dental composites. Advanced Adhesive Dentistry 3rd International Kuraray Symposium 3-4 December:3-29, 1999
  11. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: A review. Dent Mater 11: 117-125, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80046-8
  12. Watanabe LG, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ. Variables influence on shear bond strength testing to dentin Advanced Adhesive Dentistry 3rd International Kuraray Symposium 3-4 December:75-90, 1999
  13. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile strength-Evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent mater 10: 236-240, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  14. Shimada Y, Antonucci JM, Schumacher GE, McDonough WG, Tagami J. Effects of regional tooth structure and sectioning orientation on micro-shear bond strength. Advanced Adhesive Dentistry 3rd International Kuraray Symposium 3-4 December:91-103, 1999
  15. Erickson RL. Influence of test parameters on dentin bond strength measurements. Dent Res 68:374 Abst. No. 1543, 1989
  16. Miyazaki M, Oshida Y, Onose H. Dentin bonding system : Factors affecting bond strength. Modern Trends in Adhesive Dentistry Proceedings of the Adhesive Dentistry Forum ‘99 in Tsurumi, Yokohama , Japan Feb 20:56-71, 1999
  17. Elick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashely DH. Robinson SJ. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Bio Med 8:306-335, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1177/10454411970080030501
  18. Finger WJ, Fritz UB. Resin bonding to enamel and dentin with one component UDMA/HEMA adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 105:183-186, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00198.x
  19. Leirskar J, ilo G, Nordb H. In vitro shear bond strength of two resin composites to dentin with five different dentin adhesives. Quintessence Int 29:787-729, 1998
  20. Nakabayashi N. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth states. J Biomed Mat Res 16:265-273, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820160307

Cited by

  1. Correlation between Linear polymerization shrinkage & tooth cuspal deflection vol.30, pp.6, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2005.30.6.442
  2. Correlation Between the Amount of Linear Polymerization Shrinkage and Cuspal Deflection vol.31, pp.3, 2006, https://doi.org/10.2341/05-46
  3. Effect of pre-heating on some physical properties of composite resin vol.34, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.1.030