AN INTEGRATED PROCESS CONTROL PROCEDURE WITH REPEATED ADJUSTMENTS AND EWMA MONITORING UNDER AN IMA(1,1) DISTURBANCE WITH A STEP SHIFT

  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

Statistical process control (SPC) and engineering process control (EPC) are based on different strategies for process quality improvement. SPC re-duces process variability by detecting and eliminating special causes of process variation, while EPC reduces process variability by adjusting compensatory variables to keep the quality variable close to target. Recently there has been need for an integrated process control (IPC) procedure which combines the two strategies. This paper considers a scheme that simultaneously applies SPC and EPC techniques to reduce the variation of a process. The process model under consideration is an IMA(1,1) model with a step shift. The EPC part of the scheme adjusts the process, while the SPC part of the scheme detects the occurrence of a special cause. For adjusting the process repeated adjustment is applied according to the predicted deviation from target. For detecting special causes the exponentially weighted moving average control chart is applied to the observed deviations. It was assumed that the adjustment under the presence of a special cause may increase the process variability or change the system gain. Reasonable choices of parameters for the IPC procedure are considered in the context of the mean squared deviation as well as the average run length.

Keywords

References

  1. Box, G. E. P., COLEMAN, D. E. AND BAXLEY, R. V. JR. (1997). 'A comparison of statistical process control and engineering process control', Journal of Quality Technology, 29, 128-130
  2. Box, G. E. P. AND KRAMER, T. (1992). 'Statistical process monitoring and feedback adjustment-A discussion', Technometrics, 34, 251-267 https://doi.org/10.2307/1270028
  3. Box, G. E. P. AND LUCE$\~{N}$O, A. (1994). 'Selection of sampling interval and action limit for discrete feedback adjustment', Technometrics, 36, 369-378 https://doi.org/10.2307/1269952
  4. Box, G. E. P. AND LUCE$\~{N}$O, A. (1997). Statistical Control by Monitoring and Feedback Adjustment, John Wiley & Sons, New York
  5. JANAKIRAM, M. AND KEATS, J. B. (1998). 'Combining SPC and EPC in a hybrid industry', Journal of Quality Technology, 30, 189-200
  6. MACGREGOR, J. F. (1987). 'Interfaces between process control and on-line statistical process control', Computing and Systems Technology Division Communications, 10, 9-20
  7. MASTRANGELO, C. M. AND BROWN, E. C. (2000). 'Shift detection properties of moving centerline control chart schemes', Journal of Quality Technology, 32, 67-74
  8. MONTGOMERY, D. C. (1999). 'A perspective on models and the quality sciences: Some challenges and future directions', ASQ Statistics Division Newsletter, 18, 8-13
  9. MONTGOMERY, D. C., KEATS, J. B., RUNGER, G. C. AND MESSINA, W. S. (1994). 'Integrating statistical process control and engineering process control', Journal of Quality Technology, 26, 79-87
  10. NEMBHARD, H. B. AND MASTRANGELO, C. M. (1998). 'Integrated process control for startup operations', Journal of Quality Technology, 30, 201-211
  11. RUHHAL, N. H., RUNGER, G. C. AND DUMITRESCU, M. (2000). 'Control charts and feedback adjustments for a jump disturbance model', Journal of Quality Technology, 32, 379-394
  12. VANDER WIEL, S. A. (1996). 'Monitoring processes that wander using integrated moving average models', Technometrics, 38, 139-151 https://doi.org/10.2307/1270407
  13. VANDER WIEL, S. A., TUCKER, W. T., FALTIN, F. W. AND DOGANAKSOY, N. (1992). 'Algorithmic statistical process control: Concepts and an application', Technometrics, 34, 286-297 https://doi.org/10.2307/1270035