Effect of Media, Synchronization of Fibroblast Cells, Culture Time, $\textrm{O}_2$ Concentration and Activation on Developmental Rate of Nuclear Transferred Porcine Oocytes

배양액, 섬유아세포, 배양시간, 산소 농도 및 활성화 처리가 돼지 핵이식 배의 체외발달에 미치는 영향

  • Published : 2004.12.01

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine in vitro development of porcine embryos constructed by the microinjection of cultured fetal fibroblast cells into porcine oocytes matured in vitro. Single fetal donor cells were deposited into the perivitelline space of enucleated oocytes, followed by electrical fusion and activation. Activated embryos were cultured in NCSU-23 medium supplemented with 5% FBS, at 38.5$^{\circ}C$ for 6 to 8 days in 5% $CO_2$ and air. In experiment 1, fusion rates of nuclear transfer embryos did not differ for fetal fibroblast cells incubated in 5% FBS + NCSU-23 or 5% FBS + TL Heaps medium, nor did fusion rates of donor cells differ between 1-8 hr incubation durations. Fusion rates for the four treatment subclasses ranged from 72.1% to 78.0%. In experiment 2, Pre-synchronization in medium containing 0.1 $\mu\textrm{g}$/m Hoechst 33342 an increase from 0 and 8 versus 15 h culture an increased percentage of porcine fibroblast cells in G2/M at the end of the synchronization period (12.4%, 17.5% and 47.6%). Neither an increase in the concentration of H 33342 (0.2-1.6 $\mu\textrm{g}$/$m\ell$) nor a longer exposure time (12h, 18h and 24h) increased the proportion of porcine G2/M fibroblasts. In experiment 3, fusion rates did not differ significantly far nuclear transfer embryos constructed using donor cells cultured in 5% FBS + NCSU-23 medium for 1-2, 6-8 or 12-14 days (60.0%, 73.3% and 62.5%), respectively. The cleavage rate for nuclear transplant embryos using fetal fibroblast cells cultured for 1-2 days was 44.0%, significantly less than 56.7% and 50.0%. for 6-8 or 12-14 days duration of culture, respectively. In experiment 4, the proportions of nuclear transfer embryos that developed to the $\geq$2 cell and to the blastocyst stage were not affected significantly by culture medium (5% FBS + NCSU-23 or 5% FBS + TL-Heaps) or by $O_2$ concentration of the culture (5% vs 10%). Rates of development to the $\geq$2 cell stage ranged from 65.9% to 70.1%, and development rates to the blastocyst stage ranged from 9.8% to 12.5% for the four treatment subclasses. Developmental rate was highest for embryos cultured in 5% FBS + NCSU-23 under a gas atmosphere of 5% $O_2$ in air.

본 연구는 돼지 태아 섬유아세포유래 공여세포를 미세주입에 의해 주입 후 재 조합한 핵 이식 배에 대한 배양액, 세포주기의 동기화, 배양시간 및 난자의 활성화에 따른 융합율과 체외발생율에 대해 조사하였다. 핵 이식 배를 NCSU-23, TL Hepes 및 TZM-3 배양액으로 1시간 및 8시간 배양하였을 때 배반포로의 분할율은 각각 15.6%, 14.0%, 15.0% 및 13.9%, 10.5%, 13.3%로서 배양액 및 시간에 따른 분할율의 유의적인 차이는 없었다. 공여핵원용 세포를 0, 8, 15시간 배양했을 때 G2/M기로의 체외발달율은 12.0%, 18.0%, 48.0%였다(p<0.01). 공여핵원용 세포를 12-24시간 배양했을 때 G2/M기로의 체외발달율은 유의한 증가를 나타내지 않았다. 공여핵원용 세포를 10% FBS + NCSU-23 배양액으로 1-2, 6-8, 12-14일간 배양 후 핵 이식한 배의 융합율은 각각 60.0%, 73.3%, 62.5%였으며, 분할율은 각각 36.0%, 56.7%, 50.0%였다. 0.5% FBS + NCSU-23, 0.5% + TL-Heaps 및 0.5% + TZM-3 배양액으로 5% $O_2$조건 하에서 배양하였을 때 핵 이식배의 $\geq$2 cell 및 배반포로의 발생율은 각각 12.5$\pm$1.6%, 11.1$\pm$1.8%, 11.7$\pm$1.0%였으며, 10% $O_2$조건 하에서 배양하였을 때 핵 이식배의 $\geq$2 cell 및 배반포로의 발생율은 각각 10.5$\pm$1.5%, 9.8$\pm$1.4%, 10.0$\pm$0.8%였다 배양액과 $O_2$ 조건에 따른 유의한 발생율에 차이는 인정되지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Betthauser J, Forsberg E, Augenstein M, Childs L, Eilertsen K, Enos J, Forsythe T, Golueke P, Jurgella G, Koppang R, Lesmeister T, Mallon K, Mell G, Misica P, Pace M, Pfister-Genskow M, Strelchenko N, Voelker G, Watt S, Thompson S and Bishop M. 2000. Nat. Biotechnol. Oct., 18(10):1055-1059 https://doi.org/10.1038/80242
  2. Briggs R and King TJ. 1952. Transplantation of living cell nuclei from blastula cells into enucleated frog's eggs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 38: 455-463 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.38.5.455
  3. Campbell KH. 1999. Nuclear equivalence, nuclear transfer and the cell cycle. Cloning, 1:3-15 https://doi.org/10.1089/15204559950020058
  4. Cheong HT, Kwon DJ, Park YS, Hwang HS, Park CK, Yang BK and Kim CI. 2000. Developmental potentials of clone embryo derived from bovine fetal fibroblast cells. Korean J. Anim. Reprod., 24(2):49-57
  5. Collas P and Barnes FL. 1994. Nuclear transplantation by microinjection of inner cell mass and granulosa cell nuclei. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 38: 264-267 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080380306
  6. Dinnyes A, Dai Y, Barber M, Liu L, Xu J, Zhou P and Yang X. 2001. Development of cloned embryos from adult rabbit fibroblasts: effect of activation treatment and donor cell preparation. Biol. Reprod., 64:257-263 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod64.1.257
  7. First NL, Sims MM, Park SP and Kent-First MJ. 1994. Systems for production of calves from cultured bovine embryonic cells. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 6:553-562 https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9940553
  8. Fischer B and Bavister BD. 1993. Oxygen tension in the oviduct and uterus of rhesus monkeys, hamsters and rabbits. J. Reprod. Fertil., 99: 673-679 https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.0990673
  9. Hill JR, Winger QA, Long CR, Looney CR, Thompson JA and Westhusin ME. 2000. Development rates of male bovine nuclear transfer embryos derived from adult and fetal cells. Biol. Reprod., 62:1135-1140 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod62.5.1135
  10. Hwang WS, Park JI, Cho JK, Kim KY, Shin SJ, Yong HY and Lee BC. 1999. Establishment of bovine fetal fibroblast line for production of cloned calves in Korean native cattle; the effects of culture period and various cell size on the efficiency of nuclear transfer. Korean J. mb. Trans., 14(2):93-97
  11. Koo DB, Kang YK, Choi YH, Park JS, Han SK, Park IY, et al. 2000. In vitro development of reconstructed porcine oocytes after somatic cell nuclear transfer. Biol. Reprod., 63:986-992 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod63.4.986
  12. Krischer RL, Ghandi DK and Lane M. 2000. Developmentally related changes in nutrient uptake and metabolism by in vitro produced porcine embryos. Theriogenology, 53:274
  13. Kuhholzer B, Hawley RJ, Lai L, Kolber-Simonds D and Prather RS. 2001. Clonal lines of transgenic fibroblast cells derived from the same fetus result in different development when used for nuclear transfer in pigs. Biol. Reprod., 64: 1695-1698 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod64.6.1695
  14. Lee MH and Kim SK. 1991. Studies on the detrimental factors affecting in vitro maturation and fertilization of bovine follicular oocytes. Korean J. Vet. Res., 31(2): 179-187
  15. Machaty Z, Thopmson JG, Abeydeera LA, Day B and Prather RS. 2001. Inhibitors of mitochondrial APT production at the time of compaction improve development of in vitro produced porcine embryos. Mol. Reprod. Dev., 58:39-44 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2795(200101)58:1<39::AID-MRD6>3.0.CO;2-B
  16. Onishi A, Iwamoto M, Akita T, Mikawa S, Takeda K, Awata T, Hanada H and Perry AC. 2000. Pig cloning by microinjection of fetal fibroblast nuclei. Science, 289:1188-1190 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5482.1188
  17. Petters RM and Well KD. 1993. Culture of pig embryos. J. Reprod. Fertil., 48(Suppl):61-73
  18. Prather RS, Barnes FL, Sims ML, Robl JM, Eyestone WH and First NL. 1987. Nuclear transplantation in the bovine embryo: assessment of donor nuclei and recipient oocyte. Biol. Reprod., 37:859-866 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod37.4.859
  19. Schnieke AE, Kind AJ, Ritchie WA, Mycock K, Scoot AR, Ritchie M, Wilmut I, Colman A and Campbell KH. 1997. Human factor IX transgenic sheep produced by transfer of nuclei from transfected fetal fibroblasts. Science, 278:2130-2133 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5346.2130
  20. Tao T, Machaty Z, Boquest AC, Day BN and Prather RS. 1999. Development of pig embryos reconstructed by microinjection of cultured fetal fibroblast cells into in vitro matured oocytes. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 56(2):133-141 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(99)00037-8
  21. Urakawa M, Uruno K, Ideta A and Aoyaki Y. 2001. Effect on the development of bovine embryos by nuclear transfer using different cultured days of fetal fibroblast. Theriogenology, 55: 294(abstract)
  22. Verma PJ, Du ZT, Crocker L, Faast R, Grupen CG, Mcilfatrick SM, Ashman RJ, Lyons IG and Nottle MB. 2000. In vitro development of porcine nuclear transfer embryos constructed using different cultured days of fetal fibroblast. Mol, Reprod, Dev., 57:262-269 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2795(200011)57:3<262::AID-MRD8>3.0.CO;2-X
  23. Vignon X, Chesne P, Le Bourhis D, Flechon JE, Heyman Y and Renard JP. 1998. Developmental potential of bovine embryos reconstructed from enucleated matured oocytes fused with cultured somatic cells. CR Acad. Sci., 321(9): 735-745 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0764-4469(98)80014-0
  24. Wakayama T, Perry AC, Zuccotti M, Johnson KR and Yanagimachi R. 1998. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature, 23:394(6691): 369-374
  25. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ and Campbell KHS. 1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature, 27:385:810-813
  26. Yuan YQ, Van Soom, Coopman FOJ, Mintiens K, Boerjan ML, Van Zeveren A, et al. 2003. Influence of oxygen tension on apoptosis and hatching in bovine embryos cultured in vitro. Theriogenology, 59:1585-1596 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(02)01204-9