DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Invisible Web 탐색도구의 성능 비교 및 분석

The Effectiveness of the Invisible Web Search Tools

  • 노정순 (한남대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 발행 : 2004.09.01

초록

본 연구는 표준 웹 탐색엔진에 색인되지 않는 Invisible Web에 대한 특성과 Invisible Web 탐색도구들을 파악하고, 이들 도구에서 Invisible Web 탐색의 성능을 비교 평가하기 위해 수행되었다. 표준 웹 탐색엔진이 Google과 Invisible Web 탐색엔진인 Incy Wincy, Invisible Web 메타탐색엔진인 Profusion과 Search. com 에서 11개의 탐색질문이 탐색되었다. Profusion과 Search. com, Incy Wincy에서의 Invisible Web(메타) 탐색 기능은 이 세 엔진에서 제공하는 웹 메타탐색기능과도 비교되었다. 탐색결과 Google이 Invisible Web 탐색에서 Invisible Web 탐색엔진보다 .15 -.35 높은 적합성순위정확률을 보였지만 통계적으로 유의한 차이는 아니었다. (${\alpha}$=.055). Invisible Web 탐색엔진에서 웹 메타탐색은 Invisible Web(메타)탐색보다 통계적으로 유의한 수준에서 더 우수한 것으로 나타났다. 성능평가에 사용된 적합성순위정확률은 검색된 문헌의 질 (적합성)과 적합문헌의 순위를 반영하는 정확률 척도로 사용될 수 있음을 보여주었다.

This study is to investigate the characteristics of the Invisible Web and many search services designed to serve as gateways to the Invisible Web and to evaluate searching the Invisible Web in the Services. The four services for searching the Invisible Web were selected to search the Invisible Web with 11 queries, that are Google as portals, ProFusion and Search.com as Invisible Web meta search engines, and IncyWincy as Invisible Web search engines. It was found that the effectiveness of Google's Invisible Web searching was better compared with the three Invisible Web search tools but the difference between the four systems was not significant((${\alpha}$=.055) The Invisible Web meta searching was better than the Web meta searching in the three search tools at the statistically significant level. The effectiveness measurement based on the ranks and relevance degree(quality) of relevant documents retrieved seemed appropriate to the ranked search results.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 노정순. 2000. 순위화시스템의 효과측정척도에 관한 연구. '정보관리학회지', 17(4):67-81
  2. 우유미, 정영미. 1998. 웹 검색엔진의 피드백 기능평가 '제5회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집', 69-72
  3. Albert, Reka, Hawoong Jeong, and Albert-Laszlo Barabasi. 1999. 'Diameter of the World-Wide Web.' Nature, 401(Sept): 130-131 https://doi.org/10.1038/43601
  4. Bar-llan, Judit. 2002. 'Methods for measuring search engine performance over time.' Journal of the American Socie쇼 for Information Science and Technology, 53(4): 308-319 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10047
  5. Bergman, Micheal K. 2001. 'The Deep web: surfacing hidden value.' Journal of Electronic Publishing in Universi쇼 of Michgan, July, 2001. [online]. [cited 2004.8.3] .
  6. Brightplanet.com/deepcontent/index.asp. [cited 2004.8.3]
  7. Cartwright, Jason. 'Search engine indexing and dynamic sites.' VIA net. Works. [online]. [cited 2004.8.20]
  8. Eliopoulos, D. and C. Gotlieb. 2003. 'Evaluating web search results rankings.' Online, 27(2): 42-46
  9. Gauch, S. and G. Wang. 1996. 'Information fusion with Profusion.' Webnet 96 Conference, San Francisco, CA, OCtover 15-19, 1996. [online1 [cited 2004.7.13].
  10. Hawking, D., N. Draswell, and K. Griffiths. 2001. 'Measuring search engine quality.' Information Retrieval, 4(1): 33-59 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011468107287
  11. Leighton, H. V. and J. Srivastava. 1999. 'First 20 precision among world wide web search services.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(10): 870-881 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:10<870::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-G
  12. OCLC, Web Characterization Project 의 Statistics. [online]. [cited 2004.8.3].
  13. Oppenheim, C., A. Morris, C. Mcknight & S. Lowley. 2000. 'The Evaluation of WWW search engines.' Journal of Documentation, 56(2): 190-211 https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410010803810
  14. Search Engine Showdown. 'Search engine statistics: Dead links report.' [online]. [cited 2004.7.12].
  15. Sherman, Chris and Gary Price. 2001. The Invisible Web: uncovering sources search engines can't see. CyberAge Book, 2001
  16. Sherman, Chris and Gary Price. 2003. 'The Invisible Web: uncovering sources search engines can't see.' Library Trends, 52(2): 282-298
  17. Sullivan, D. 2002. 'Neilsen//NetRatings: searching engine ratings.' [Online]. [cited 2004.8.2].
  18. Thelwall, M. 2002. 'In Praise of Google: finding law joural Web sites.' Online Information Review, 26(4): 271-272 https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520210438732
  19. Vaughan, Liwen. 2004. 'New measurements for search engine evaluation proposed and tesed.' Information Processing and Management, 40(2): 677-691 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(03)00043-8

피인용 문헌

  1. Analysis and Evaluation of Video Search Services of Korean Search Portals: Naver versus Google Korea vol.31, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.181