한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제24권3호
  • /
  • Pages.668-674
  • /
  • 2004
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지

PISA 검사 결과에서 드러난 만15세 한국 학생들의 온실효과에 대한 대안적 개념

Korean Fifteen-Year-Olds' Alternative Conceptions on the Greenhouse Effect Revealed in PISA Test Results

  • 발행 : 2004.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 PISA 검사결과를 토대로 온실효과에 대하여 우리나라의 만 15세 학생들이 지니고 있는 전형적인 학생개념의 유형을 분석하였다. 온실효과에 대한 기존 선행연구에서 밝혀진 학생들의 대안적인 개념에 비추어 볼 때, 현재 우리나라의 만15세 학생들의 온실효과에 대한 이해 수준을 온실효과의 자연적 요인과 인위적 요인으로 나누어 분석하고, 온실 효과를 초래한 원인에 대한 학생들의 오개념 유형을 살펴보았다. 이산화탄소 이외에 지구의 온도 상승에 기여하는 요인들 우리나라 학생들은 프레온 가스, 매연, 수증기, 메탄 등을 지적하였다. 또한 많은 학생들이 온실효과와 오존층 파괴가 인과관계를 지니고 있는 것으로 파악하고 있음을 알 수 있었다. 과학과 교수 학습에 얻을 수 있는 시사점을 도출하였다.

This study investigated Korean fifteen-year-olds' (mis)conceptions on the greenhouse effect based on the PISA results. Based on previous studies on students' ideas about the greenhouse effect, Korean students'understanding of the natural factors and human-induced factors of the greenhouse effect were analyzed. Students' misconceptions about causes of the greenhouse effect were also examined. In addition to CO2, Students mentioned CFCs, atmospheric pollution, water vapor and methane as greenhouse gases. Many students indicated that the greenhouse effect and ozone depletion have a causal relationship. Teaching implications of the misconceptions were also discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 국동식(2003). 온실효과 개념에 대한 오개념 원인으로서의 10학년 과학 교과서 분석. 한국과학교육학회지，23(5), 592-598
  2. 제귀연, 안희수(1999). 온실효과에 대한 학생들의 개념분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(4), 585-594
  3. 한재영, 정영선, 노태희(2000). 산성비, 오존층, 온실효과에 대한 고등학생들의 개념. 한국과학교육학회지，20(3). 364-370
  4. Andersson, B., & Wallin A.(2000). Students' understanding of the greenhouse effect. the societial consequences of reducing CO2 emissions and the problem of ozone layer depletion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10). 1096-1111 https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1096::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-8
  5. Boyes, E. & Stanisstreet. M.(1997). Children's models of understanding of two major global environmental issues(ozone layer and greenhouse effect). Research in Science & Technological Education, 15(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0263514970150102
  6. Driver, R. Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P.(1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12 https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023007005
  7. Duit, R.(1995). The constructivist view: A fashionable and fruitful paradigm for science education research and practice, In L. Steffe and J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, 271-286
  8. EPA(2002). Greenhouse gases and global warming potential values: Excerpt from the inventory of US greenhouse emissions and sinks: 1990-2000. US Environmental Protection Agency
  9. Fisher, B, W.(1998). There's a hole in my greenhouse effect. School Science Review, 79(288), 93-99
  10. Groves, F. H., & Pugh, A. F.(1999). Elementary preservice teacher perceptions of the greenhouse effect, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 75-81 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009433705790
  11. Jeffries, H., Stanisstreet, M., & Boyes, E.(2001), Knowledge aboutthe greenhouse effect: have college students improved? Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(2), 205-221 https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140120087731
  12. Khalid, T.(2001). Preservice teachers' misconceptions regarding three environmental issues. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6, Spring, 102-120
  13. Khalid, T.(2003). Preservice high school teachers' perceptions of three environmental phenomena. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 35-50 https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620303466
  14. Koulaidis, V., & Christidou, V.(1998). Models of students' thinking concerning the greenhouse effect and teaching implications. Science Education, 83. 559-576 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199909)83:5<559::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-E
  15. Miller, R.(1989). Introduction: Science education and science studies. In R Miller (Ed.), Doing science: Images of science in science education. The Falmer Press: Philadelphia, 1-9
  16. OECD(2003a). The PISA 2003 Assessment Frameworks: Mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. OECD, Paris: France
  17. OECD(2003b). Preliminary Report of main study cognitive Data Analysis. OECD, Paris, France
  18. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertrog, W. A.(1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207