한국비블리아학회지 (Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science)

한국비블리아학회 (Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science)
권호 표지

패싯 분석을 이용한 웹 자원의 조직

A Study on Organizing the Web Using Facet Analysis

  • 투고 : 2004.05.28
  • 심사 : 2004.06.23
  • 발행 : 2004.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

웹 자원을 색인 및 조직하는 데에는 키워드 추출에 기반한 자동색인에 의한 방법과 기존의 분류 체계나 주제별 디렉토리를 이용하는 방법이 있다. 그러나 두 방법은 각각 표준적인 방식이 없거나 분류 구조상의 불합리성으로 인하여 이용자의 정보 요구에 제대로 대처하지 못하고 있다. 따라서 이 논문에서는 기존 분류 체계의 구조상의 한계와 특정성과 망라성과 같은 웹 자원의 특성과 관련된 문제를 지적함과 더불어 패싯 분석에 의한 웹 자원 조직의 타당성과 그 장단점을 기술하였다. 그리고 패싯 분석을 이용 한 구체적인 방법론 세 가지를 제시하였다. 첫째, 패싯 분석을 기반으로 한 색인 시스템, 둘째, 열거형 분류 체계를 패싯 분류 체계로 구조를 수정한 대안, 셋째, 국내 검색 엔진의 주제별 디렉토리의 패싯 모형 등이다. 이러한 방법론들을 검토한 결과, 패싯 분석에 의한 통제어휘 구축이 웹 자원을 조직하는 수단으로 활용될 수 있는 가능성을 제시하였다.

In indexing and organizing Web resources, there have been two basic methods: automatic indexing by extracting key words and library classification schemes or subject directories of search engines. But, both methods have failed to satisfy the user's information needs, due to the lack of standard criteria and the irrationality of its structural system. In this paper I have examined the limits of library classification scheme's structures and the problems related to the nature of Web resources such as specificity and exhaustivity. I have also attempted to explain the logicality of Web resources organization by facet analysis and its strengths and limitations. In so doing, I have proposed three specific methods in using facet analysis: firstly, indexing system by facet analysis; secondly, the alternative transformation of the enumerative classification scheme into facet classification scheme; and finally, the facet model of subject directory of domestic search engine. After examining the three methods, my study concludes that a controlled vocabulary by facet analysis can be employed as a useful method in organizing Web resources.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김성희. 2002. 인터넷상의 디지털문화컨텐츠 분류 방안에 관한 연구. 한국문헌정보학회지, 36(3): 181-200.
  2. 김정현, 문지현. 2002. 농학분야 인터넷 자원의 분류 체계에 관한 연구. 한국도서관정보학회지 , 33(3): 393-413.
  3. 김태수. 2000. 분류의 이해 . 서울: 문헌정보처리연구회.
  4. 이란주, 성기주, 양정하. 2001. 여성학분야 인터넷 자원의 분류에 관한 연구. 한국도서관정보학회지 , 32(3): 397-417.
  5. 이창수. 2000. 정보통신기술분야 인터넷 자원의 분류 체계에 관한 연구. 한국도서관정보학회지 , 31(4): 111-138.
  6. 정영미. 1997. 지식구조론. 서울: 한국도서관협회.
  7. 최재황. 1998. 인터넷 학술정보 자원의 디렉토리 서비스 설계에 있어서 DDC 분류 체 계의 활용에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지 , 15(2): 47-67.
  8. 최희윤. 1998. 인터넷 정보서비스의 분류 체계에 대한 비교 연구: 물리학을 중심으로.정보관리학회지 , 15(3): 45-71.
  9. Berners-Lee, Tim, J. Hendler and O.Lassila. 2001. The Semantic Web.Scientific American 284(5) [cited2004. 3. 20]
  10. Broughton, Vanda. 2001. Faceted Classification as a Basis for Knowledge Organization in a Digital Environment; the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a Model for Vocabulary Management and the Creation of Multidimensional Knowledge Structure. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 7: 67-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614560108914727
  11. Broughton, Vanda. 2002. Facet Analytical theory as a Basis for a Knowledge Organization Tool in a Subject Portal. Seventh International ISKO Conference. Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Organization for the 21st Century: Integration of Knowledge across Boundaries. 10-13 July 2002. [Spain,Granada].
  12. Devadason, F. J., N. Intaraksa, P.Patamawongjariya, and K. Desai. 2002. Faceted Indexing Based System for Organizing and Accessing Internet Resources. Knowledge Organization 29(2): 65-77.
  13. Ellis, David, and Ana Vasconcelos. 1999.Ranganathan and the Net: Using Facet Analysis to Search and Organise the World Wide Web.Aslib Proceedings 51(1): 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006956
  14. Fensel, Dieter, Handler, J., Lieberman,H., and Wahlster, W. 2003. Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential. Cambridge : MIT Press
  15. Hudon, M. 2000. Innovation and Tradition in Knowledge Organization Schemes on the Internet, or, Finding One's Way in the Virtual Library. Proceedings of the Sixth International ISKO Conference. [Wurzberg, Germany : Ergon Verlag].
  16. Iyer, Hemalata. 1995. Classificatory Structures: Concepts, Relations and Representation. Textbook for Knowledge Organization, vol. 2. Indeks Verlag, Frankfurt/Main.
  17. Koch, Traugott. 1997. The Role of Classification Schemes in Internet Resource Description and Discovery.DESIRE Specification for Resource Description Methods Part 3. [cited 2004. 3. 20]
  18. Maple, A. 1995. Faceted Access; a Review of the Literature. Paper Presented at the Music Library Association Annual Meeting 10 February. [cited 2001. 9. 11] 재인용: Broughton Vanda. 2002. Facet Analytical Theory as a Basis for a Knowledge Organization Tool in a Subject Portal. Seventh International ISKO Conference. Challenges in Knowledge Representation and Organization for the 21st Century: Integration of Knowledge across Boundaries. 10-13 July. [Spain, Granada].
  19. McKiernan, G. 1997. Hand-made in Iowa: Organizing the Web Along the Lincoln Highway. D-Lib Magazine.[cited 2004. 2. 7]
  20. McKiernan, G. 1998. Beyond Bookmarks:a Review of Frameworks, Features, and Functionalities of Scheme for Organizing the Web. Internet Reference Services Quarterly 3(1):69-77. https://doi.org/10.1300/J136v03n01_11
  21. McKiernan, G. 1999. Points of View:Conventional and ‘Neo-conventional’Access and Navigation in Digital Collection. Journal of Internet Cataloging 2(1): 23-41 https://doi.org/10.1300/J141v02n01_04
  22. McKiernan, G. 2000. Beyond Bookmarks:Schemes for Organizing the Web.[cited 2004. 4. 21].
  23. Patel, Dimpel. 2002. Organizing the Web:a Faceted Approach. Workshop on Information Resource Management. 13th-15th march. [DTRC, Banglore].
  24. Pollitt, A. Steven, Amanda J. Tinker and Patrick A. J. Braekevelt. 1998. Improving Access to Online Information Using Dynamic Faceted Classification. Online Information 98 Proceedings 17-21.
  25. Ranganathan, S. R. 1951. Classification and Communication. Delhi University Publications, Library Science Series, 3. Delhi : University of Delhi.
  26. Ranganathan, S. R. 1965. A Descriptive Accout of the Colon Classification. [reprinted 1990] Banglore : Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science.
  27. Saeed, H. & A. S. Chaudry. 2001. Potential of Bibliographic Tools to Organize Knowledge on the Internet: the Use of Dewey Decimal Classification Scheme for Organizing Web Based Information Resources. Knowledge Organization 26(2): 80-96.
  28. Spiteri, Louise. 1998. A Simplified Model for Facet Analysis. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science 23: 1-30.
  29. Svenonius, Elaine. 1983. Use of Classification in Online Retrieval. Library Resources and Technical Services 27(1): 76-80.
  30. Woodward, J. 1996. Cataloging and Classifying Information Resources on the Internet. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 31: 189-220.
  31. Zins, Chaim. 2002. Models for Classifying Internet Resources. Knowledge Organization 29(1): 20-28.