TECHNOLOGY-NEUTRAL NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REGULATION: IMPLICATIONS OF A SAFETY GOALS- DRIVEN PERFORMANCE-BASED REGULATION

  • MODARRES MOHAMMAD (Department of Mechanical Engineering University of Maryland College Park)
  • Published : 2005.06.01

Abstract

This paper reviews the pivotal phases of the evolution of the current technology-dependent nuclear power safety regulation in the United States. Understanding of this evolution is essential to the development of any future regulatory paradigm, including the technology-neutral regulatory approach that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has recently embarked on to develop. The paper proposes and examines the implications of a predominately rationalist and best-estimate probabilistic regulatory framework called safety goals-driven performance-based regulation. This framework relies on continuous assessment of performance of a set of time-dependent safety-critical systems, structures and components that assure attainment of a broad set of technology-neutral protective, mitigative, and preventive goals. Finally, the paper discusses the steps needed to develop a corresponding technology-neutral regulatory system from the proposed framework.

Keywords

References

  1. SECY-02-0139, 'Plan for Resolving Policy Issues Related to Licensing Non-Light Water Reactor Designs July 22, 02'
  2. Sorensen J., Apostolakis, G., Kress T., and Powers D. On The Role of Defense In Depth in Risk-Informed Regulation, Proceedings of PSA'99, Washington, DC, August 22-26, 1999.
  3. Rhodes R, the Making of the Atomic Bomb, New York, Simon & Schuster, 1986.
  4. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, WASH-1400: Reactor Safety Study (NUREG-75/014), Oct. 1975.
  5. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Safety Goal Policy Statement, 'Safety Goals for the Operations of Nuclear Power Plants; Policy Statement,' USNRC, Federal Register, Vol. 51, p. 30028 (51 FR 30028), August 4, 1986.
  6. Pavey, D., et al., Cost Effective Modernisation of Systems Important to Safety, Post FISA-2003 Workshop Report, 2003.
  7. Lord Robens, Safety and Health at Work. Report of the Committee 1970 - 72. HMSO Cmnd 5034, 1972.
  8. Lord Cullen, The public inquiry into the piper alpha disaster, HMSO Cm 1310, 1990.
  9. Modarres, M. Krivtsov, V, Kaminskiy, K., Reliability Engineering and Risk Analysis: A Practical Guide, Marcel Dekker, 1999