DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

목화 주요형질의 Vr-Wr그래프 분석

Vr-Wr Analysis of Yield Characters in Cotton

  • 최주호 (진주산업대학교 작물생명과학과) ;
  • 이신우 (진주산업대학교 작물생명과학과) ;
  • 이철호 (진주산업대학교 작물생명과학과) ;
  • 전현식 (진주산업대학교 작물생명과학과)
  • Choi Chu-Ho (Dept. of Crop Science & Biotechnology Jinju National University) ;
  • Lee Shin-Woo (Dept. of Crop Science & Biotechnology Jinju National University) ;
  • Lee Cheol-Ho (Dept. of Crop Science & Biotechnology Jinju National University) ;
  • Chun Hyun-Sik (Dept. of Crop Science & Biotechnology Jinju National University)
  • 발행 : 2005.06.01

초록

목화 10품종을 이면교배하여 얻은 $F_1\;and\;F_2$, 45개 조합을 공시하여, 수량과 관련된 주당삭수, 개당삭중, 주당종실수, 100립중, 섬도, 섬유장 등 6개 형질을 조사하고 그 형질들이 나타내는 변이를 Hayman과 Jinks의 Vr-Wr graph분석방법에 의해 유전자 분포상태 및 우성정도를 검토한 결과를 요약하면 다음과 같다. 1. 유전적 변이 분석에서 모든 실험 형질간에 높은 유의성이 나타났다. 2. Vr-Wr 그래프분석에 의한 $F_1$의 형질별 우성정도는 삭중, 1삭조면중, 섬도를 제외한 모든 실험형질에서 완전 우성으로 유전되었으나, $F_2$의 우성정도 및 유전자 분포상태는 $F_1$과 다소 다른 경향이었다.

The quantitative inheritance of some yield characters in Gosyium spp was carried out by means of a $10\times10$ diallel cross. In this study, 45 combinations of $F_1\;and\;F_2$ generations were genetically analyzed through 10 different cultivars diallel cross population of cotton (Gosyium spp) at an experimental field. The results of Vr-Wr graph analysis of six characters such as number of boll, boll weight, lint weight per boll, 100 seeds weight, fiber fineness and fiber length in those combinations by the Hayman's method were as follow: 1. The significant difference was observed from the genetic variance of all the examined characters. 2. On based the Vr-Wr graphical analysis, $F_1$ showed a complete dominance in all the experimental characters except boll weight, lint weight per boll and fiber fineness, but the dominance degree and gene arrangement of $F_2$ were somewhat different from those of $F_1$.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bing T., J. N. Jenkins, J. C. McCarty and C. E. Watson. 1993. F2 hybrids of host plant germplasm and cotton cultivars; I . Heterosis and combining ability for lint yield and yield components. Crap Science 33, 700-705 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300040012x
  2. Bowman D. T. and J. E. Jones. 1984. A diallel study of bract surface area / Lint weight per boll ratio in cotton. Crop Science 24, 1137-1141 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400060031x
  3. Chung W. B., D. S. Chung, H. J. Chung and K. Y. Chang. 1993. Genetic analysis on quantitative characters of upload cotton by diallel cross. Korean J. Breed. 24(3), 242-250
  4. Fryxell, P. A. 1984. Taxonomy and Germplasm Resources. pp. 27-57. In Kohel, K J. and C. F. Lewis (eds.), Cotton. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America. Madison, Wisconsin. USA
  5. Grimes, D. W. and H. Yamada. 1982. Relation of cotton and yield to minimum leaf water potential. Crap Science 22, 134-139 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200010031x
  6. Hayman, B. J. 1954. The theory and analysis of diallel crosses. Genetics 39, 789-809
  7. Jinks, J. J. and B. J. Hayman. 1953. The analysis of diallel crosses. Maize Genet. News Lett. 27, 48-54
  8. Kae B. M. 1982. Studies on population genetics and breeding of upload cotton (Gossypium hirsutum 1.) in Korea. Korean J. Breed. 14(2), 187-232
  9. Marani, A. 1963. Heterosis and combining ability for yield and components of yields in a diallel cross of two species of cotton. Crop Science 3, 552-555 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1963.0011183X000300060030x
  10. Marani, A. 1968. Heterosis and inheritance of quantitative characters in interspecific crosses of cotton. Crop Science 8, 299-303 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1968.0011183X000800030012x
  11. Marani, A., J. C. Williams, H. F. Robinson and K. E. Comstock. 1958. Estimates of genotypic and environmental variances and covariances in upland cotton and implications in selection. Agron. J. 50, 126-131 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1958.00021962005000030004x
  12. Marani, A. and J. Dag 1962. Inheritance of the ability of cotton seeds to germinate at low temperature in the first hybrid generation. Crop Science 2, 243-245 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1962.0011183X000200030019x
  13. Meredith, W. K, Jr. and K. K. Bridge. 1972. Heterosis and gene action in cotton, Gossypium hirsutum J. Crap Science 12, 304-309
  14. Meredith, W. R. Jr. and R. R. Bridge. 1984. Genetic contributions to yield changes in cotton. In Fehr, W. K (ed.) Genetic contributions to yield gains of major crop plants. Am. Society of Agronomy, pp. 75-87
  15. Meredith, W. R. Jr., R. R. Bridge and J. F. Chism. 1970. Relative performance of $F_1$ and $F_2$ hybrids from douvled haploids and their parent varieties in upland cotton, Gossypium hirsutum J. Crop Science 10, 295- 298 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1970.0011183X001000030025x
  16. Randy W. and W. R. Meredith, Jr. 1984. Comparative growth obsolete and modern cotton cultivars. I. Vegetative dry matter partitioning. Crop Science 24, 858-862 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400050008x
  17. Yates, F. 1947. Analsis of data from all possible reciprocal crosses between a set of parental lines. Heredity 1, 287-301 https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1947.19