설측 교정치료를 위한 셋업 모형 제작의 정밀도

Construction of an ideal set-up model for lingual orthodontic treatment

  • 배기선 (부산대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 손우성 (부산대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Bae, Gi-Sun (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Son, Woo-Sung (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 발행 : 2005.12.31

초록

치아 모형 및 셋업 모형에서의 정확한 순설측 및 근원심 경사의 측정을 위해 개발된 셋업 모형 측정기로 4개의 제1소구치 발거 후 설측 교정치료를 시행 받은 22명의 성인 환자들의 치료 전후의 진단 모형 및 셋업 모형을 계측하여 설측 교정치료에서 간접 접착술식을 위해 사용되는 셋업 모형의 형태가 치료 결과에 미치는 영향을 알아보고자 하였다. 연구결과 치료 전 진단 모형과 셋업 모형간의 상하악 6전치의 순설측 및 근원심 경사 차이는 각각 $-3.93{\pm}6.98^{\circ},\;1.87{\pm}5.79^{\circ}$ 였으며 셋업 모형과 치료 후 치아 모형간의 차이는 $-4.31{\pm}5.91^{\circ},\;-2.16{\pm}3.27^{\circ}$였다. 치료 후 치아 모형에서는 치료 전에 비해 상하악 전치부의 순설측 경사가 $-8.24{\pm}5.39^{\circ}$ 만큼 유의성 있게 변화되었다. 또한 facebow transfer 등을 통해 교합기에 치아 모형을 거상하지 않고도 셋업 모형 측정기만으로 치아 모형과 측모 두부방사선규격사진을 서로 연계하여 분석하는 방법을 고안하여 그 임상적용 가능성을 알아보고자 하였다. 이를 위하여 셋업 모형 측정기를 사용하여 진단용 모형으로부터 측정한 계측 게이지 각과 측모 두부방사선규격사진상에 동일한 계측점화 선분들을 작도하여 측정한 산출 게이지 각을 비교하였으며 그 결과 상하악 모두에서 유의성 있는 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 따라서 셋업 모형 측정기를 사용하여 측모 두부방사선사진에서의 계측 치들을 진단용 모형에서의 계측치와 서로 연계시켜 분석하고 이를 셋업 모형 제작 시 반영하는 방법이 임상적으로 사용 가능함을 알 수 있었다.

Making a precise and ideal set-up model is an essential part in the indirect bonding procedure for lingual orthodontic treatment. To evaluate the accuracy of the making a set-up model, 22 adult patients who received lingual orthodontic treatment with 4 bicuspid extractions were selected, and 3 sets of dental models (before, set-up, and after treatment) were measured using the set-up model gauge, an instrument for measuring the inclination and angulation of the clinical crowns on the dental model. Two sets of lateral cephalograms (before and after) from each patient were also evaluated. The mean difference between the before treatment model and the set-up model was $-3.93{\pm}6.98^{\circ}$ for the inclination and $1.87{\pm}5.79^{\circ}$ for the angulation. And the mean difference between the set-up model and the after treatment model was $-4.31{\pm}5.91^{\circ}$ labiolingually and $-2.16{\pm}3.27^{\circ}$ mesiodistally, The after treatment model differed from the before treatment model about $-8.24{\pm}5.39^{\circ}$ in inclination. There were no significant difference between the measured gauge that measured from the dental model using the set-up model gauge and the calculated gauge angle measured from the lateral cephalogram using constructed points and lines. Using the set-up model gauge, it is possible to evaluate the study model 3-dimensionally in relation with the patient's lateral cephalogram and establish whether the doctor's prescription or overcorrection is built in the set-up model precisely.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Diamond M. Critical aspects of lingual bracket placement. J Clin Orthod 1983;17:688-91
  2. Scholz RP, Swartz ML. Lingual Orthodontics: A status report. Part 3. Indirect bonding - laboratory and clinical procedures. J Clin Orthod 1982;16:812-20
  3. Smith .JR, Gorman JC, Kurz C, Dunn RM. Keys to success in lingual therapy. Part 1. J Clin Orthod 1986;20:252-61
  4. Aguirre MJ. Indirect bonding for lingual cases. J Clin Orthod 1984;18:565-9
  5. Alexander RG. Alexander discipline. Glendora: Ormco corporation, 1986. p. 371-430
  6. Fillion D. The thickness measurement system with the DALI program In: Romano R editor. Lingual orthodontics. Ontrario: B.C. Decker Inc;1998. p. 175-84
  7. 경희문. Set-up 모형을 이용한 간접접착술식. 대치협회지 1989;27:73-82
  8. Kurz C, Desire R. Illustrated syllabus of lingual orthodontics. Glendora: Ormco corporation; 1989
  9. Hong RK, Soh BC. Customized indirect bonding method for lingual orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 1996;30:650-2
  10. Hiro T, Takemoto K. Resin core indirect bonding system improvement of lingual orthodontic treatment. Orthod Waves 1998;57:83-91
  11. Kim TW, Bae GS, Cho JH. New indirect bonding method for lingual orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 2000;34:348-50
  12. Hong RK, Kim YH, Park JY. A new customized lingual indirect bonding system. J Clin Orthod 2000;34:456-60
  13. Kyung HM, Park HS, Sung JH. The mushroom bracket positioner. J Clin Orthod 2002;36:320-8
  14. Knierim RW. A simplified wax set-up technique. J Clin Orthod 1975;9:305-7
  15. Resnick BN. Technique clinic: A simplified diagnostic setup technique. J Clin Orthod 1979;13:128-9
  16. Kim SH, Park YG. Easy wax setup technique for orthodontic diagnosis. J Clin Orthod 2000;34: 140-4
  17. Chiappone RC. Constructing the gnathologic setup and positioner. J Clin Orthod 1980;14:121-33
  18. Roth RH. Functional occlusion for the orthodontist. Part 4. J Clin Orthod 1981;15:246-65
  19. Andrews LF. The six keys to optimal occlusion In: Straight wire, the concept and appliance. San Diego: LA Wells; 1989. p. 13-24
  20. 배기선, 손우성, 박수병. 3차원 두부방사선규격사진의 정확성에 관한 연구 - 실제 계측 및 측모 두부방사선규격사진 계측과의 비교. 대치교정지 1997;27:129-40
  21. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Assessment of second order clearances between orthodontic archwire and bracket slot via the critical contact angle for binding. Angle Orthod 1999;69:71-80
  22. Siatkowski RE. Loss of anterior torque control due to variations in bracket slot and arch wire dimensions. J Clin Orthod 1999;33:508-10
  23. Takemoto K. Extraction mechanics. In: Scuzzo G, Takemoto K editor. Invisible orthodontics: current concepts and solutions in lingual orthcxlontics. Germany: Quintessenz- Verl.; 2003. p. 61-95
  24. Takemoto K. Sliding mechanics versus loop mechanics during En masse retraction in extraction case. In: Romano R editor. Lingual orthodontics. Ontrario: B.C. Decker Inc.: 1998. p. 109-15
  25. Geron S. The lingual bracket jig. J Clin Orthod 1999:33:457-63
  26. Fontenelle A. Lingual orthodontics in adults: Segmented mechanics in lingual orthodontics: How? In: Melsen B editor. Current controversies in orthodontics. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co.: 1991. p. 232-46
  27. Park YC, Choy KC, Lee JS, Kim TK. Lever-arm mechanics in lingual orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 2000:34:601-5
  28. Carter RN. Quick-mounted diagnostic study models. J Clin Orthod 1984;18:423-6
  29. Slavicek R. Clinical and instrumental functional analysis for diagnosis and treatment planning: Part 4. Instrumental analysis of mandibular casts using the mandibular position indicator. J Clin Orthod 1988: 22:566-75
  30. Sassouni V. Cephalometric trimming of dental cast. J Clin Orthod 1970;4:148-55
  31. Silver WE. Oriented study models. J Clin Orthod 1974:8:468-72
  32. Schwestka R, Roese D, Kuhnt D. Splint for controlling vertical position in maxillary osteotomies. J Clin Orthod 1990:24:427-31
  33. Wong RW. Innovations in orthognathic splint construction. J Clin Orthod 1985:19:750-6
  34. Manhartsberger C. Gnathological orientation splint for presurgical orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 1993:27:94-5
  35. Berkman MD, Goldsmith DG, Rothchild D, Tireger N, Shprintzen RJ, Evaluation? diagnosis - planning: The challenge in the correction of dentofacial deformities. J Clin Orthod 1979;13:526-38
  36. 황해상, 권오원. 정상교합자의 안이평변에 대한 개개 치아의 순, 협설측 경사와 근원심경사. 대치교정지 1998;28:791-802
  37. 권오원, 황해상. 개개 치아의 inclination과 angulation을 측정하는 보조기를 이용한 tooth positioner의 제작. 대치교정지 1999;31:620-3
  38. Hong RK. Sunwoo J, Park JH. Incisor inclination indicators for diagnostic setups. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:620-3
  39. Melsen B, Biaggini P. The Ray set: a new technique for precise indirect bonding. J Clin Orthod 2002:36:648-54