DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nonlinear Dynamic Behavior of a Cold-Formed Steel Shear Panel by Shaketable Tests

진동대 실험을 통한 조립식 스틸 전단 패널의 비선형 동적 거동

  • Published : 2005.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the nonlinear behavior of a cold-formed steel (CFS) shear panel, which was composed of built-up columns and tension-only diagonal straps for bracing, when excited by earthquake motions. For the purpose, shaketable tests of a full-scale two-story cold-formed steel (CFS) shear panel were conducted. in the shear panel, the diagonal strap is a major lateral force resisting system, which is a very ductile member, and the columns, which are gravity resisting members, are fabricated by wooing studs, which can't develop their full flexural strength because they may buckle locally. The test results showed that the straps dissipate most of energy of the shear panel in a tension-only and pinched way and the columns dissipate it relatively smaller than the straps but they still contribute to overall dissipation. As a result of this study, investigating real nonlinear behavior of a structure in earthquakes is a very important process by shaketable tests even though it is simple.

본 연구의 목적은 인장으로만 저항하는 경사진 스트랩과 기둥으로 구성된 조립식 스틸 (CFS) 전단 패널의 지진하중에 대한 비선형 거동을 조사하는 것이며, 이를 위해 실제 크기의 2층 건물을 설계한 후 진동대 실험을 수행하였다. CFS 전단 패널은 연성이 큰 경사진 스트랩이 주 횡 저항 시스템으로 작용하며, 중력 저항 부재인 기둥은 'ㄷ'자 형태의 스터드를 용접한 것으로서 비콤펙트단면을 가지며 국부 좌굴로 인해 자신의 최대 모멘트 강도를 발휘하지 못한다. 진동대 실험을 통하여 스트랩이 대부분의 에너지를 인장측만으로 핀칭 형태를 가지며 소산하며, 기둥은 국부 좌굴로 인해 기둥은 자신의 최대 강도를 발휘하지 못하나 전체 에너지 소산에 공헌을 하고 있음을 보여주었다. 본 연구 결과, 비록 구조물이 단순할지라도 지진 시 실제 비선형 거동을 진동대 실험으로 조사하는 것은 매우 중요한 과정임을 확인하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Fulop, L. and Dubina, D. 'Seismic Performance of Wall-Stud Shear Walls,' Sixteenth International Specialty Conference on Cold-Formed Steel Structures, Orlando, Florida, 2002, pp. 483-500
  2. Adham, S.A., Avanessian, V., Hart, G.C., Anderson, R.W., Elmlinger, J. and Gregory, J. 'Shear Wall Resistance of Lightgage Steel Stud Wall System,' Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1990, pp. 1-14 https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585555
  3. USGS National Seismic Hazard Maps, http.//earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/
  4. TI 809-07, Design of Cold-Formed Loadbearing Steel Systems and Masonry Veneer / Steel Stud Walls, Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2002
  5. Somerville, P. N., Smith, S., Puntamurthula and J. Sun, 'Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project,' Background Document, Report No. SAC/BD-97/04, 1997
  6. American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), Specification for the design of cold-formed steel structural members: 1996 Edition, AISI, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 1997
  7. ASCE 8-02, Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Stainless Steel Structural Members, ASCE, Reston, Virginia, 2002, 110pp
  8. Schafer, B.W. and Pekoz, T., 'Direct Strength Prediction of Cold-formed Steel Members Using Numerical Elastic Buckling Solutions,' Second International Conference on Thin-Walled Structures: Thin-Walled Structures, Research and Development, Singapore, 1998, pp. 137-144