Korean Journal of Food Science and Technology (한국식품과학회지)

Korean Society of Food Science and Technology (한국식품과학회)
권호 표지

Assessment of Contamination Level of Foodborne Pathogens in the Main Ingredients of Kimbab during the Preparing Process

김밥제조단계에서의 김밥 주원료에 대한 위해미생물의 오염도 평가

  • Park, Shin-Young (Department of Food Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Won (Department of Food Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Yeon, Ji-Hye (Department of Food Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Lee, Min-Jeong (Department of Food Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Oh, Deog-Hwan (School of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Kangwan National University) ;
  • Hong, Chong-Hae (Department of Veterinary Medicine, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Park, Gyung-Jin (Korea Health Industry Department Institute) ;
  • Woo, Gun-Jo (Korea Food and Drug Administration) ;
  • Park, Jong-Seok (Korea Food and Drug Administration) ;
  • Ha, Sang-Do (Department of Food Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University)
  • Published : 2005.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Contamination levels of total aerobic bacteria, coliforms, Esherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and Listeria monocytogenes of Kimbab and its main ingredients sampled from general and specialized restaurants were compared. Total aerobic bacteria and coliform counts of Kimbab samples from both restaurant types were not significantly different (p>0.05), showing approximately $4\;to\;6\;log_{10}CFU/g$. E. coli counts were significantly higher in kimbab from general restaurants ($65%:\;0.7-2.6\;log_{10}CFU/g$) than those from specialized ones ($8.33%:\;0.70log_{10}CFU/g$), whereas those of S. aureus and B. cereus were not significantly different (p>0.05). L. monocytogenes was not detected in all Kimbab samples. These results indicate hygiene of Kimbab and its main ingredients are deleterious. Contamination levels of pathogens determined in the present study may be used as primary data for microbial risk assessment.

본 연구는 경기남부지역의 일반음식점과 김밥전문음식점으로 나누어 제조단계에 있는 김밥과 김밥의 원료를 대상으로 하여 총호기성균 오염도 분석결과, 김, 단무지, 햄에서만 차이를 보였을 뿐 전반적으로 $5-6 log_{10}CFU/g$ 수준으로 통계적인 유의 차는 없었다(p>0.05). 대장균군(coliforms)의 경우도 계란에서만 차이를 보였을 뿐 일반음식점과 김밥전문음식점의 오염수준은 $4 log_{10}CFU/g$ 수준으로 유의차가 없었다(p>0.05). E. coli는 일반음식점에서 65% 검출빈도에 $0.7-2.6 log_{10}CFU/g$ 수준의 오염을 보여 8.33% 검출빈도에 $0.70 log_{10}CFU/g$수준의 오염을 보인 김밥전문음식점 보다 유의적으로 높은 검출율을 보였다. S. aureus는 단무지를 제외한 모든 원료, 즉 밥, 김, 햄, 계란, 오이, 우엉, 당근, 게맛살에서 $0.21-5.88 log_{10}CFU/g$수준에서 20100% 빈도로 검출되었으며 일반음식점과 김밥전문음식점간의 유의차는 없었다(p>0.05). B. cereus는 김밥 중 17-20% 빈도에 $0.7-3.4 log_{10}CFU/g$수준의 오염을 보였으며, 일반음식점과 김밥 전문음식점간의 유의차는 없었다(p>0.05). L. monocytogenes는 모든 김밥과 원료에서 전혀 검출되지 않았다. 전반적으로 경기도 남부지역에서 제조된 김밥과 그 원료에 대한 위생수준은 상당히 불량한 것으로 판단되어지며, 본 연구에서 밝혀진 식중독균의 정량적 분석자료는 미생물위해평가(MRA)의 기초자료로 활용될 수 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi SK, Lee MS, Lee KH, Lim DS, Lee KH, Choi KH, Kim CH. Changes in quality of hamburger and sandwich during storage under simulated temperature and time. Korean J. Food Sci. Ani. Resour. 18: 27-34 (1998)
  2. Kim DH, Song HP, Kim JK, Kim JO, Lee HJ, Byun MW. Determination of microbial contamination in the process of rice rolled in dried laver and improvement of shelf-life by gamma irradiation. J. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 32: 991-996 (2003) https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2003.32.7.991
  3. Korea Federation of Housewives Clubs. Total aerobic bacteria and Escherichia coli crowded in Kimbab. Comsumer 10: 11-13 (1993)
  4. KFDA. Food Code. Korea Food and Drug Administration, Seoul, Korea (1993)
  5. KFDA. Food Code. Korea Food and Drug Administration, Seoul, Korea (2003)
  6. KFDA. Korea Food and Drug Administration. http://www.kfda.co.kr. Accessed Oct.25, 2004
  7. Kang KH, Choi SK, Ko AK, Kim HL, Kim KM, Park SI. Prediction of the cause of bacterial contamination in Kimbab and its ingredients. J. Fd. Hyg. Safety. 10: 175-180 (1995)
  8. Park JH, Park DW, Kim JS. Microbiological risk management of manufactory process for ready-to-eat compound foods. Food Sci. Ind. 36: 4-17 (2003)
  9. Kim JG. Microbiological quality assessment of Kimbab according to preparation and cooking condition and identification of critical control points in the processes. J. Fd. Hyg. Safety 19: 66-73 (2004)
  10. Lee H, Lee G, Yoon E, Kim H, Kang K, Lee D, Park J, Lee S, Woo G, Kang S, Yang J, Yang K. Computation of maximum edible time using monitoring data of Staphylococcus aureus in Kimbab and Food MicroModel. J. Fd. Hyg. Safety. 19: 49-54 (2004)
  11. Kang Y, Yoon S, Jwa S, Lee D, Woo GJ, Park Y, Kim C. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus in Kimbab. J. Fd. Hyg. Safety. 17: 31-35 (2002)
  12. KFDA. Food Code. Korea Food and Drug Administration, Seoul, Korea (2002)
  13. Maddux RL, Koehne G. Identification of Staphylococcus hyicus with the API Staph strip. J. Clin. Microbiol. 15: 984-986 (1982)
  14. USDA. U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Science & Inspection Service, Office of Public Health and Science. Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook. Available from http://www.fsis.usda.gov. Accessed Oct.25, 2004
  15. SAS Institute Inc. SAS User's Guide. Statistical Analysis Systems Institute, Cary, NC, USA (2002)
  16. Luginbuke R, Schlotzhauer SD. SAS/SAT Guide for Personal Computers, 6th ed. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA (1987)
  17. Lee HS, Ryu SY. The seasonal microbiological quality assessment of Kimbab (seaweed roll) production flow in foodservice facilities for Univ. students -HACCP model. Korean J. Soc. Food Sci. 14: 367-374 (1998)
  18. Hajime S. Increase in host resistance by lactic acid bacteria. 9th International academic symposium-lactic acid bacteria and health. The Korean Public Health Association. (1995)
  19. Kim B, Hong K, Park J. Improvement in storage stability of Danmooji (salted radish) by high hydrostatic pressure and heat treatment. Korean J. Food Sci. Technol. 30: 132-138 (1998)
  20. Chang DS, Shin DH, Jung DH, Lee IS. Bacterial food poisoning, pp. 71-111. In: Food Hygiene. Chang DS, Shin DH, Jung DH, Lee IS (eds). Chungmoongak, Inc., Seoul, Korea (2003)
  21. Walls I, Scatt VN. Use of predictive microbiology in microbial food safety risk assessment. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 36: 97-102 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(97)01260-9
  22. Lim JH, Kim YH, Ahn YT, Kim HU. Studies on the contamination and inhibition of Bacillus cereus in domestic raw milk and milk products. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 42: 215-222 (2000)
  23. Andersson A, Ronner U, Granum PE. What problems does the food industry have n with the spore-forming pathogens Bacillus cereus and Clostridium perfringens? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 28: 145-155 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1605(95)00053-4
  24. USDA/FSIS. Chapter 12. Examination of meat and poultry products for Bacillus cereus. U.S. Department of Agriculture/Food Science & Inspection Service Microbiology Laboratory Guidebook. Available from http://www.fsis.usda.gov. Accessed Oct.25, 2004
  25. FDA. Bacteriological Analytical Manual. U.S. Food & Drug Administration Center for Food Safety & Applied Nutrition. Available from http://www.cfsan.fda.gov. Accessed Oct.25, 2004
  26. Finlay WJJ, Logan NA, Sutherland AD. Bacillus cereus emetic toxin production in cooked rice. Food Microbiol. 19: 431-439 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.2002.0505