Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

MICROSHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF ADHESIVES ACCORDING TO THE DIRECTION OF ENAMEL RODS

법랑소주 방향에 따른 접착제의 미세전단 결합강도

  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Jin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 김종진 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2005.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study compared the microshear bond strength $({\mu}SBS)$ to end and side of enamel rod bonded by four adhesives including two total etch adhesives and two self-etch adhesives. Crown segments of extracted human molars were cut mesiodistally. The outer buccal or lingual surface was used as specimens cutting the ends of enamel rods, and inner slabs used as specimens cutting the sides of enamel rods. They were assigned to four groups by used adhesives: Group 1 (All-Bond 2), Group 2 (Single Bond), Group 3 (Tyrian SPE/One-Step Plus), Group 4 (Adper Prompt L-Pop). After each adhesive was applied to enamel surface, three composite cylinders were adhered to it of each specimen using Tygon tube. After storage in distilled water for 24 hours, the bonded specimens were subjected to ${\mu}SBS$ testing with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The results of this study were as follows: 1. The $({\mu}SBS)$ of Group 2 $(16.50\pm2.31 MPa)$ and Group 4 $(15.83\pm2.33 MPa)$ to the end of enamel prism was significantly higher than that of Group 1 $(11.93\pm2.25 MPa)$ and Group 3 $(11.97\pm2.05 MPa)$ (p<0.05). 2. The $({\mu}SBS)$ of Group 2 $(13.43\pm2.93 MPa)$ to the side of enamel prism was significantly higher than that of Group 1 $(8.64\pm1.53 MPa)$, Group 3 $(9.69\pm1.80 MPa)$, and Group 4 $(10.56 \pm1.75 MPa)$ (p<0.05), 3. The mean $({\mu}SBS)$ to the end of enamel rod was significantly higher than that to the side of enamel rod in all group (p<0.05).

본 연구는 법랑소주의 말단과 측면에 대한 3단계, 2단계 및 단일 단계 접착제의 미세전단 결합강도를 상호 비교하였다. 발거된 상$\cdot$하악 대구치를 근, 원심 방향으로 1mm 두께가 되도록 절단하였다. 시편 중 협면과 설면 중앙부의 최 외층을 법랑소주의 말단이 노출된 시편으로 이용하였고, 내측에서 얻어진 시편을 법랑소주의 측면이 노출된 시편으로 이용하였다. 사용된 접착제에 따라 4개의 군 (1군 All-Bond 2, 2군: Single Bond, 3군: Tyrian SPE/One-Step Plus, 4군: Adper Prompt L-Pop)으로 분류하였다. 각 군당 법랑소주의 말단과 측면이 노출된 시편을 각각 7개씩 선택하여 각각의 접착제와 Tygon tube를 이용하여 복합레진을 접착한 후, universal testing machine에서 분당 1 mm의 crosshead speed의 전단하중을 가하여 미세전단 결합강도를 측정하였다. 각 군의 미세전단 결합강도를 통계학적으로 분석하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1 법랑소주 말단에 대한 미세전단 결합강도는 2군과 4군이 1군과 3군보다 통계학적으로 높게 나타났다 (p<0.05) 2. 법랑소주 측면에 대한 미세전단 결합강도는 2군은 1군, 3군, 4군보다 그리고 4군은 1군보다 통계학적으로 높게 나타났다 (p<0.05). 3. 모든 군에서 법랑소주 말단에 대한 미세전단 결합강도는 법랑소주 측면에 대한 결합강도보다 통계학적으로 높게 나타났다 (p<0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel. Am J Dent 16:329-334, 2003
  2. Cardoso PFC, Meloncini MA, Placido E, Lima JDO, Tavares AU. Influence of the substrate and load application method on the shear bond strength of two adhesive systems. Oper Dent 28(4):388-394, 2003
  3. Dickens SH, Milos MF. Relationship of dentin shear bond strengths to different laboratory test designs. Am J Dent 15:185-192, 2002
  4. Franchi M, Breschi L. Effects of acid-etching solutions on human enamel and dentin. Quintesscence Int 26:431-435, 1995
  5. Gilpatrick RO, Ross JA, Simonsen RJ. Resin-to-enamel bond strengths with various etching times. Quintesscence Int 22:47-49, 1991
  6. Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 24:172-180, 1999
  7. Hara AT, Amaral CM, Pimenta LAF, Sinhoreti MAC. Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel. Am J Dent 12:181-184, 1999
  8. Ikeda T, Uno S, Tanaka T, Kawakami S, Komatsu H, Sano H. Relation of enamel prism orientation to microtensile bond strength. Am J Dent 15:109-113, 2002
  9. Toledano M, Osorio R, de Leonardi G, Rosales-Leal JI, Ceballos L, Cabrerizo-Vilchez M.A. Influence of self-etching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 14:205-210, 2001
  10. Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. part II : etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mat 17:430-444, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00104-4
  11. Fabianelli A, Kugel G, Ferrari M. Efficacy of self-etching primer on sealing margins of class II restorations. Am J Dent 16:37-41, 2003
  12. Torii Y, Itou K, Nishitani Y, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K. Effect of phosphoric acid etching to self-etching primer application on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 15:305-308, 2002
  13. Miyazaki M, Hinoura K, Honjo G, Onose H. Effect of self-etching primer application method on enamel bond strength. Am J Dent 15:412-416, 2002
  14. Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 27:523-530, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00008-1
  15. Perdigao J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P, Leitao J, Van Meerbeek B. Effects of a self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 10:141-146, 1997
  16. Shimada Y, Kikushima D, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength of resin-bonding systems to cervical enamel. Am J Dent 15:373-377, 2002
  17. Shimada Y, Senawongse P, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF, Nakaoki Y, Tagami J. Bond strength of two adhesive systems to primary and permanent enamel. Oper Dent 27:403-409, 2002
  18. Munechika T, Suzuki K, Nishiyama M, Ohashi M, Horie K. A comparison of the tensile bond strengths of composite resins to longitudinal and transverse sections of enamel prisms in human teeth. J Dent Res 63(8):1079-1082, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630081501
  19. Cavalho RM, Santiago SL, Fernandes CA, Suh B, Pashley DH. Effect of prism orientation on tensile strength of enamel. J Adhes Dent 2(4):251-257, 2000
  20. Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 25:11-19, 2000
  21. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Pashley DH. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength-evaluation of micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10:236-240, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  22. Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effects of regional enamel and prism orientation on resin bonding. Oper Dent 28:20-27, 2003
  23. Shimada Y, Iwamoto N, Kawashima M, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Shear bond strength of current adhesive systems to enamel, dentin and dentin-enamel junction region. Oper Dent 28(5):585-590, 2003
  24. Yoshiyama M, Sano H, Ebisu S, Tagami J, Ciucchi B, Carvalho RM, Jonson MH, Pashley DH. Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin. J Dent Res 75:1404-1413, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750061201

Cited by

  1. Enamel adhesion of light- and chemical-cured composites coupled by two step self-etch adhesives vol.32, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.3.169