CRASHWORTHINESS IMPROVEMENT OF VEHICLE-TO-RIGID FIXED BARRIER IN FULL FRONTAL IMPACT USING NOVEL VEHICLE'S FRONT-END STRUCTURES

  • ELMARAKBI A. M. (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto) ;
  • ZU J. W. (Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto)
  • Published : 2005.10.01

Abstract

There are different types of vehicle impacts recorded every year, resulting in many injuries and fatalities. The severity of these impacts depends on the aggressivety and incompatibility of vehicle-to-roadside hardware impacts. The aim of this paper is to investigate and to enhance crashworthiness in the case of full barrier impact using a new idea of crash improvement. Two different types of smart structures have been proposed to support the function of the existing vehicle. The work carried out in this paper includes developing and analyzing mathematical models of vehicle-to-barrier impact for the two types of smart structures. It is proven from analytical analysis that the mathematical models can be used in an effective way to give a quick insight of real life crashes. Moreover, it is shown that these models are valid and flexible, and can be useful in optimization studies.

Keywords

References

  1. Appel, H. and Tomasd, J. (1973). The enrgy management structure for the Volkswagen ESV. SAE Paper No. 730078
  2. Cacciaube, A. (1972). Frontal Crash-Influence of the Deceleration Mode (at the Seat Belts Anchorage Points) on Severity Indices. 3rd ESV Conference, Washington, USA,141-145
  3. Clark, C. (1994). The crash anticipating extended airbag bumper system. 14th ESV Conference, Munich, Germany, 1468-1480
  4. Coo, P., Janssen, E., Goudswaard, A., Wismans, J. and Rashidy, M. (1991). Simulation model for vehicle performance improvement in lateral collision. 13th ESV Conference, Paris, France, Paper No. 91-S5-O-25
  5. Ellis, E. (1976). Extensible vehicle bumper. US Patent Office, Pat No. 3947061
  6. Jawad, S., Mahmood, H. and Baccouch, M. (1999). Smart structure for improving crashworthiness in vehicle frontal collisions. The ASME Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Nashville, Tennessee, USA, 135-144
  7. Jawad, S. and Baccouch, M. (2001). Frontal offset crash-smart structure solution. The ASME Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, New York, NY, USA, 213-222
  8. Kamal, M. (1970). Analysis and simulation of vehicle-to-barrier impact. SAE Trans. 79, SAE Paper No. 700414
  9. Reuber, G. and Braun, A. (1994). Bumper system having an extendable bumper for automotive Vehicles. US Patent Office, Pat No. 5370429
  10. Rupp, W. (1974). Front energy management parametric variation study. 5th ESV Conference, London, England, 602-614
  11. Schwarz, R. (1971). Hydraulic energy absorption systems for high-energy collisions. 2nd ESV Conference, Sindelfingen, Germany, Sec. 3, 36-74
  12. Wang, J. (1994). Bumper energy absorber. US Patent Office, Pat No. 5967573
  13. Witteman, W. and Kriens, R. (1998). Modeling of an innovative frontal car structure: similar deceleration curves at full overlap, 40 percent offset and 30 degrees collisions. 16th ESV Conference, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, 194-212
  14. Witteman, W. (1999). Improved vehicle crashworthiness design by control of the energy absorption for different collision situations. Ph.D. Dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology, Automotive Engineering & Product Design Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  15. Witteman, W. and Kriens, R. (2001). The necessity of an adaptive vehicle structure to optimize deceleration pulses for different ceash velocities. 17th ESV Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1-10