DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Comparison of Intellectual Structure in Records Management and Archives Using Author Cocitation Analysis

저자 동시인용분석에 의한 국내외 기록관리학 분야의 지적구조 비교에 관한 연구

  • 김희정 (미국 University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
  • Published : 2005.09.01

Abstract

This study investigated the intellectual structure of records management and archives field in Korea and America using author cocitation analysis. Major journals in the field from 2000 to 2004 are used to select frequent cited authors. Cocited authors are analyzed in details by means of multi-variate statistical techniques such as multidimensional scaling. To the analysis of this intellectual structure, main research topics in Korea were laws and policies related to records management and archives whereas information technology based electronic records management in America.

본 연구에서는 저자 동시인용분석 기법을 이용하여 최근 5년간의 국내와 미국의 기록관리학 분야의 지적구조를 분석하고 비교하였다. 이를 위하여 2000년부터 2004년까지 발간된 국내와 미국의 기록관리 분야의 대표적인 학술지를 중심으로 핵심 저자군을 선정하였고, 이들 저자들간의 동시인용빈도를 적용하여 다차원축척기법에 의한 이차원상의 저자지도를 산출하여 지적구조를 확인하였다. 지적구조의 비교분석 결과 국내의 기록관리학 연구영역은 기록관리학 관련 법제도$\cdot$정책 분야에 집중되어 있는 반면, 미국의 기록관리학 연구영역은 정보기술을 기반으로 한 전자기록물 관리 연구주제를 중점적으로 수행해온 것으로 나타나서 국내 기록관리학의 향후 연구방향 및 연구영역 확대의 필요성을 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 서은경. 1992. '정보검색분야의 지적구조와 변화에 관한 연구 : 영어문화권 저자들을 중심으로.' '정보관리학회지', 9(1): 55-82
  2. Acedo, F. J. and J. C. Casillas. 2005. 'Cur- rent paradigms in the international management field: An author co- citation analysis.' International Business Review, 14(5): 619-639 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.05.003
  3. Alan E. Bayer, J. C. S., Gerald W. Mc- Laughlin. 1990. 'Mapping intellectual structure of a scientific subfield th- rough author cocitations.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6): 444-452 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<444::AID-ASI12>3.0.CO;2-J
  4. Antonio-Rafael Ramos-Rodriguez, J. R.-N. 2004. 'Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the Strategic Management Journal, 1980- 2000.' Strategic Management Journal, 25(10): 981-1004 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.397
  5. Cook, T. 2001. 'Archival science and post- modernism: new formulations for old concepts.' Archival Science, 1(1): 3-24 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435636
  6. Couture, C. 2001. 'Education and Research in Archival Science: General Tendencies.' Archival Science, 1(2): 157-182 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435646
  7. Duranti, L. 2001. 'The impact of digital technology on archival science.' Ar- chival Science, 1(1): 39-55 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435638
  8. Fredriksson, B. 2003. 'Postmodernistic Ar- chival Science - Rethinking the Me- thodology of a Science.' Archival Science, 3(2): 177-197 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435657
  9. He, Y. and S. Cheung Hui. 2002. 'Mining a Web Citation Database for author co-citation analysis.' Information Pro- cessing & Management, 38(4): 491- 508 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4573(01)00046-2
  10. Katherine W. McCain. 1986. 'Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3): 111-122 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198605)37:3<111::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-D
  11. Mary J. Culnan, C. A. O. R., III, Jennifer A. Chatman. 1990. 'Intellectual structure of research in organizational behavior, 1972-1984: A cocitation analysis.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6): 453-458 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199009)41:6<453::AID-ASI13>3.0.CO;2-E
  12. Norusis, M. J. 2002. SPSS 11.0 guide to data analysis. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall
  13. Ribeiro, F. 2001. 'Archival Science and Changes in the Paradigm.' Archival Science, 1(3): 295-310 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02437693
  14. Rousseau, R., and A. Zuccala. 2004. 'A classification of author co-citations: Definitions and search strategies.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(6): 513-529 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10401
  15. Rumschottel, H. 2001. 'The Development of Archival Science as a Scholarly Di- scipline.' Archival Science, 1(2): 143- 155 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435645
  16. White, H., and B. Griffith. 1981. 'Author Cocitation: a Literature Measure of Intellectual Structure.' Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3): 163-172 https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
  17. White, H., and E. Greenlee. 1990. 'A Co- Citation Study of AIDs Research.' In: C. Borgman ed. Scholarly Com- munication and Bibliometrics. New- bury Park: Sage Publication, pp. 166-193

Cited by

  1. Research Trends of Archival Information Services in Korea vol.13, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2013.13.3.199
  2. Exploring the emerging intellectual structure of archival studies using text mining: 2001—2004 vol.34, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551507086260
  3. A Reference Study on Archives and Records Management in the Journal of the Korean Society of Archives and Records Management during the Period of 2001-2010 vol.45, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.2.367
  4. An Informetric Analysis on Intellectual Structures with Multiple Features of Academic Library Research Papers vol.28, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2011.28.2.065
  5. A Study on the Research Trends of Records and Archive Management in North America through the Review of Archivaria vol.14, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2014.14.4.099
  6. The Study on the Genealogy and Impact Factor of Papers by Citation Analysis vol.44, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.2.357