The KIPS Transactions:PartD (정보처리학회논문지D)

Korea Information Processing Society (한국정보처리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Opportunity Tree and Algorithm design to schedule management

일정관리를 위한 Opportunity Tree 및 알고리즘 설계

  • 이은서 (숭실대학교 정보미디어기술연구소) ;
  • 이상호 (숭실대학교 컴퓨터학부)
  • Published : 2005.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

There are many defects that cause the schedule and qualify problems during software development. This paper designs the opportunity tree framer work that removes and manages the schedule and quality problems as well. For the similar projects, we can estimate defects and prepare to solve them by using domain expert knowledge and the opportunity tree framework which can greatly improve the software process. This research provides solution of schedule defect problem and detection of defect and its causes that happen on software development.

소프트웨어 개발 시, 일정과 품질에 저해 요인이 되는 결함이 다수 존재한다. 일정과 품질의 저해 요인을 제거하고 동시에 체계적으로 이를 관리하기 위하여 본 논문에서는 opportunity tree 프레임워크를 설계한다. 유사한 프로젝트를 수행 시 영역 전문가의 지식을 활용한 opportunity tree 발생되는 문제점을 예측, 대비할 수 있게 하여, 소프트웨어 프로세스를 개선할 수 있다 본 연구에서는 소프트웨어 개발 시 발생하는 일정관리에 대한 결함을 찾아내고, 원인을 식별 및 해결책을 제시하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 이경환, 'HDC를 위한 모델링', 제 5회 한국정보과학회 소프트웨어공학 연구회, 2003.01
  2. Annual research review, USC/CSE workshop reports, 2002
  3. Software process improvement forum, KASPA SPI-7, 2002
  4. George eckes, 'The six sigma revolution', John willey & sons, 2001
  5. SPICE assessment in korea, The korea SPICE, 2002
  6. 신경애, 결함중요도 단계를 고려한 소프트웨어 신뢰도 성장 모델에 관한 연구', 컴퓨터 산업교육기술 학회논문지, Vol. 3, No.07 pp.837-844, 2000.
  7. Robert h. dunn, 'Software defect removal', Mcgraw-hill, 1984
  8. Ram chillarrege, Kothanda r. prasad, 'Test and development process retrospective a case study using ODC triggers', IEEE computer society, 2002
  9. N. fenton and N. ohlsson, 'Quantitative analysis of faults and failures in a complex software system', IEEE Trans. Software Eng, pp.797-814, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1109/32.879815
  10. McCall, P.K. richards and G.F. walters, 'Factors in software quality', Vol.1, 2 and 3. Springfield VA, AD/A-049-014/015/055, 1997
  11. Vouk, Mladen, 'Software reliability engineering, Tutorial notes topics in reliability & maintainability & statistics', 2000 annual reliability and maintainability symposium, 2000
  12. Padberg, 'A fast algorithm to component maximum likelihood estimates for the hypergeometric software reliability model', Asia-pacific conference on quality software APAQS, 2001
  13. Vamder wiel, Votta, 'Assessing software designs using capture-recapture methods', IEEE transaction on software engineering Vol.2 pp.1045-1054, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1109/32.256852
  14. Wohlin, Runeson, 'Defect content estimations from review data', Proceedings international conference on software engineering ICSE pp.400-409, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.1998.671393
  15. Gaffney, John, 'Some models for software defect analysis', Lockheed martin, 1996
  16. L.hatton, 'Is modularization always good idea', Information and software technology, Vol.38, pp.719-721. 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-5849(96)01120-2
  17. B. compton and C. withrow, 'Prediction and control of ada software defects', J. systems and software, Vol.12, pp.199-207, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-1212(90)90040-S
  18. N. fenton and M. neil, 'Software metrics : successes, failures, and new directions', J. systems and software, Vol. 47, pp.149-157, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(99)00035-7
  19. Roger s. pressman 'Software engineering' Mcgraw-hill international edition, 1997
  20. Tim kasse, 'Actin focused assessment for software process improvement', Artech house, 2002
  21. Thomas saaty, 'Analytical planning', Rws publications, 1985
  22. Victor basili, G. caldiera and D. rombach, 'The experience factory', Encyclopedia of software engineering, Wiley, 1994
  23. Victor basili, G. caldiera and D. rombach, 'The goal question metric approach', Wiley, 1994
  24. Victor basili, 'The experience factory and its relationship to other improvement paradigms', Lecture notes in computer science. 1993
  25. Barry boehm, 'Software cost estimation with COCOMO II', Prentice-Hall PTR, 2000
  26. Paulish, and Carleton, 'Case studies of software process improvement measurement,' Computer, Vol.27, No.9, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1109/2.312039
  27. Roger s. pressman, 'Software engineering: A practitioner's approach', Mcrwa-hill international editions, 1997
  28. 이은서, 이경환, '소프트웨어 결함 분석을 위한 트리거 설계', 한국정보처리학회논문지, 2003
  29. 이은서, 이경환, 소프트웨어 결함 처리를 위한 Opportunity Tree 및 알고리즘 설계, 제11-D권 제4호 PP873, 한국정보처리학회 논문지, 2003. 08 https://doi.org/10.3745/KIPSTD.2004.11D.4.873
  30. Chris frye, 'Understanding components', Andersen consulting knowledge exchange, 1998
  31. Grady booch, 'A primary contributor to the UML and rational software's objectory process', 1997
  32. Tim kasse, 'Actin focused assessment for software process improvement', Artech house, 2002