DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Relation between Record and Information Management and Knowledge Management from the Perspective of Knowledge Management : Focused on the Definition and Management Process

지식경영 관점에서 본 기록관리와 지식경영의 연관 관계 - 지식의 정의와 지식관리 프로세스를 중심으로 -

  • 노정란 (서울여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Published : 2005.12.01

Abstract

The various concepts of knowledge such as Knowledge Management(KM). Intellectual assets and digital knowledge asset management are currently important issues among many organizations. To the country like Korea that has professed Itself for a great power of knowledge Information and adopted KM and Record and Information Management (RIM) as the country's main polity, the study on the theoretical basis and best practices of KM and RIM from the perspective of Library & Information science is very urgent. However, many studies on knowledge including KM were mainly done at the business administrative field. and the consolidated study basis on knowledge even in the Library & Information Sciences was quite in deficiency, furthermore any discussion on knowledge, correlation among related systems and the possibilities of cooperation as the development of Information communication has not been done. Therefore, this study is to present the alternative plan of the consolidated management on knowledge through comparative analysis on the definition, main function and trend of KM & RIM. Especially, this study would be the theoretical basis to the public organizations that plan to introduce KM & RIM.

지식경영(Knowledge Management), 지적 자산, 디지털 지식자산관리 등 지시에 관한 개념은 오늘날 많은 조직에서 중요한 화두가 되고 있다. 특히 우리나라의 경우만 보더라도 '지식정보화 강국'을 표방하면서 지식경영과 기록관리를 주요시책으로 채택하고 있어 문헌정보학의 관점에서 이에 대한 이론적 기반과 Best Practice에 관한 연구가 시급하다. 그러나 지식경영을 비롯 지식에 관한 종래의 많은 연구는 경영학 분야에서 주되게 연구되었거나 문헌정보학 내에서도 지식에 관한 통합적 연구 기반은 매우 부족한 형편이어서 정보통신발달(ICTs)에 따른 지식 및 관련 시스템 간의 관련성. 협업 가능성에 관한 논의도 거의 이루어지지 않고 있다. 이에 본 연구에서는 특히 지식경영과 기록관리를 중심으로 지식의 범주, 관리방법 등을 비교 연구함으로써 지식에 관한 통합관리의 발전적 대안을 제시하고자 한다. 본 연구는 특히 향후 지식경영 렌 기록관리체제를 도입하고자 하는 공공기관에 이론적 논거가 될 것으로 판단한다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김주희, 유성호, 김영걸. 2001. 지식관리시스템 성과에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 탐색적 사례 연구.'Working Paper, KGSM-KMRC-21001-02'
  2. 노정란. 1999. 지식경영과 정보인프라, 정보전문가의 관계. '한국비블리아', 9: 207-220
  3. 노정란, 이건창. 2002. 국내 공기업의 지식경영시스템 구축사례 연구-한국자산관리공사의 K-Wings를 중심으로 -. '한국문헌정보학회지', 36(2): 243-264
  4. 노정란. 2003. 전문도서관 기반의 지식경영 방법론 연구 - 특히 참고 봉사를 중심으로 -. '한국문헌정보학회지', 37(2): 343-364
  5. 노정란. 2004. 지식의 공통적 정의와 발전적 연관 관계에 관한 연구 - 일반적 정보시스템과 지식경영, DSS, EIS를 중심으로 -. '한국문헌정보학회지', 38(2): 239-259
  6. 이건창, 노정란. 2002. 지식순환과정과 지식스키마를 고려한 지식경영시스템 성과 및 수용에 관한 연구. '한국문헌정보학회지', 36(3): 259-274
  7. 이희석, 최병구. 2001. 지식관리 유형 도출과 기업성과에의 영향 분석. 'Working Paper, KGSM-KMRC-2001-04'
  8. Alavi, M. and D. Leidner. 1999. 'Knowledge Management Systems: Emerging Views and Practices from the Field.' Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, CD-Rom Version
  9. An, Xiaomi. 2003. “An integrated approach to records management." Information Management Journal, 37(4 Jul/Aug): 24-30
  10. Anklam, Patti. 2002. 'Knowledge Management : The Collaboration Thread.' Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 27 (Aug/Sep): 8-11
  11. Bierly, P. and Chakrabarti, A. 1996. 'Generic Knowledge Strategies in the U.S. Pharmaceutical Industry.' Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Spe- cial): 123-135 https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171111
  12. Carr, Nicholas. 2003. 'IT doesn't matter.' Harvard Business Review, 81(5 May): 41-49
  13. Davenport, Thomas H. and Prusak, Lawrence. 1998. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press
  14. Day, George S. 2002. 'Managing the market learning process.' The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 17(4): 240-252 https://doi.org/10.1108/08858620210431651
  15. Day, Ian. 1997. 'The Role of Records Mana- gement in Business Information Ser- vices.' Records Management Journal, 7(2 August): 91-99 https://doi.org/10.1108/eb027106
  16. Edwin Dietel, J.(J. D.). 2000. 'Improving Corporate Performance Through records audits.' Information Management Journal, 34(2, Apr): 18-26
  17. Farneth, David & E Nye, Barbara. 2005. 'Managing Business Records and Archives at the Getty Center.' Information Management Journal, 39(2, Mar/Apr): 46-52.
  18. Forgionne & Kohli. 2000
  19. Hansen, M., Nohria, N., and Tierney, T. 1999. 'What's Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?' Harvard Business Review, March-April: 106-116
  20. Huotari, Maija-Leena, Valtonen, Marjo Rita. 2003. 'Emerging Themes in Finnish Archival Science and Record Management Education.' Archival Science, 3(2): 117-129 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435654
  21. Jordan, J., and Jones, P. 1997. 'Assessing your Company's Knowledge Management Style.' Long Rounge Planning, 30(3): 392-398 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)90254-5
  22. Kohave, Ron, Rothleder, Neal J., and Simoudis, Evangelos. 2002. 'Emerging trends in business analytics.' Communications of the ACM, 45(8, August): 45-48
  23. Myburgh, Sue. 2004. 'Competitive Intelligence: Bridging Organizational Boundaries.' Information Management Journal. 38(2, Mar/Apr): 46-55
  24. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeguchi. 1995. The Knowledge Creating Company. Oxford University Press
  25. Nonaka, I. and N. Konno. 1998. 'The Concept of 'Ba': Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation.' California Management Review, 40(3): 3-54 https://doi.org/10.2307/41165939
  26. O'Leary, D.E. 1998a. 'Enterprise Knowledge Management.' IEEE Computer, March: 54-61
  27. O'Leary, D.E. 1998b. 'Knowledge Management Systems: Converting and Connecting.' IEEE Intelligent Systems, May/June:30-33
  28. Pemberton, J Michael. 2004. 'KM & RIM Oil & Water?' Information Management Journal, 38(3, May/Jun): 47-55
  29. Prusak, L. 1997. Knowledge Management : The Ultimate Competitive Weapon, IBM Global Service
  30. Ruggles, R. 1998. 'The State of the Notion: Knowledge Management In Practice.' California Management Review, 40(3): 80-89. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165944
  31. Swan, J., Newell, S. and Robertson, M. 2000. 'Limits of IT-driven Knowledge Management for Interactive Innovation Processes : Towards a Community-Based Approach.' Proceedings of $33^{rd}$ HICSS
  32. Townley, Charles Thomas. 2001. 'Knowledge Management and Academic Libraries.' College &research Libraries, 62(1): 44-55 https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.62.1.44
  33. Upward, Frank. 2000. 'Modelling the Continuum as Paradigm Shift in Recordkeeping and Archiving Processes, and Beyond A personal Reflection.' Record Management Journal, 10(3)
  34. Van der Spek, R. and A. Spijkervet. 1997. Knowledge Management: Dealing Intelligently with Knowledge, in Knowledge Management And Its Integrative Elements(eds. Liebowitz,J. & Wilcox, L.), New York: CRC Press
  35. Wiig, K.M. 1997. 'Integrating Intellectual Capital and Knowledge Management.' Long Lange Planning, 30(3): 323-324 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)00020-4
  36. Yakel, Elizabeth. 2000. 'Knowledge Management: The archivist's records manager's perspective.' Information Management Journal. 34(3, Jul): 24-29
  37. Zack. M. H. 1999. 'Developing a Knowledge Strategy.' Califonia Management Reviewl. 41(3): 125-145 https://doi.org/10.2307/41166000