DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Determination of Nutritive Value of Wild Mustard, Sinapsis arvensis Harvested at Different Maturity Stages Using In situ and In vitro Measurements

  • Kamalak, Adem (Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Nutrition) ;
  • Canbolat, Onder (Bursa Uludag University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Nutrition) ;
  • Gurbuz, Yavuz (Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Nutrition) ;
  • Ozkan, Cagri Ozgur (Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Nutrition) ;
  • Kizilsimsek, Mustafa (Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Crop Science)
  • Received : 2004.10.26
  • Accepted : 2005.03.18
  • Published : 2005.09.01

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of maturity stage on the nutritive value of wild mustard straw in terms of chemical composition, in situ, in vitro dry matter degradability and calculated ME. The nutritive values of wild mustard, Sinapsis arvensis hays harvested at three stages were evaluated by chemical composition, in vitro gas production and in situ dry matter degradation methods. Gas production or dry matter (DM) degradation were determined at 0, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h and their kinetics were described using the equation p = a+b(1-e$^{-ct}$). Maturity had a significant effect on both the chemical composition and degradability of wild mustard. Neutral detergent fibre (NDF) and acid detergent fibre (ADF) (p<0.001) increased with increasing maturity whereas the crude protein (CP) (p<0.001) decreased. The gas produced after 96 h incubation ranged between 64.7 and 81.5 ml per 0.200 g of dry matter. The gas production (ml) at all incubation times and estimated parameters decreased with increasing maturity of wild mustard. The gas production at all incubation times and estimated parameters (a, b (a+b), metabolizable energy (ME) and organic matter digestibility (OMD)) were negatively correlated with NDF and ADF. The DM disappearance after 96 h incubation ranged between 50.8 and 76.1%. The in situ DM disappearance at all incubation times and estimated parameters decreased with increasing maturity of wild mustard. The in situ dry matter disappearance at all incubation times and some estimated parameters (c, a, b and effective dry matter degradability (EDMD)) were negatively correlated with NDF and ADF but positively correlated with CP. The nutritive value of wild mustard continually changed as it matured. Wild mustard, harvested at the proper stage of maturity offers considerable potential as a high quality forage for ruminants during the winter feeding period. The present study showed that if higher quality forage is an objective, wild mustard should be harvested at the early flowering stage.

Keywords

References

  1. Abdulrazak, S. A., T. Fujihara, J. K. Ondiek and E. Orskov. 2000. Nutritive evaluation of some Acacia tree leaves from Kenya. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 85:89-98.
  2. AFRC. 1992. Technical committee on responses to nutrients, Report No: 9. Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: Protein. Nutritional abstract and Review, Series B, 62 (12):787-835. CAB. International, Wallingford, Oxon.
  3. AOAC. 1990. Official Method of Analysis. pp. 66-88. 15th ed. Washington, DC. USA.
  4. Beuvink, J. M. W and S. F. Spoelstra. 1992. Interactions between substrate, fermentation end products, buffering systems and gas production upon fermentation of different carbohydrates by mixed rumen micro-organisms in vitro. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 37:505-509.
  5. Blummel, M. and E. R. Orskov. 1993. Comparison of an in vitro gas production and nylon bag degradability of roughages in predicting feed intake in cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 40:109-119.
  6. Buxton, D. R. 1996. Quality related characteristics of forages as influenced by plant environment and agronomic factors. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 59:37-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00885-3
  7. Doane, P. H., P. Schofield and A. N. Pell. 1997. Neutral detergent fibre disappearance, gas and volatile fatty acids production during the in vitro fermentation of six forages. J. Anim. Sci. 75:3342-3352.
  8. Evitayani, L. Warly, A. Fariani, T. Ichinohe, A. A. Abdulrazak and T. Fujihara. 2004. Comparative rumen degradability of some legume forages between wet and dry season in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(8):1107-1111.
  9. Hides, D. I. I., J. A. Lovatt and M. W. Hayward. 1983. Influence of stage of maturity on the nutritive value of Italian ryegrasses. Grass Forage. Sci. 38:33-38.
  10. Khazaal, K., M. T. Dentinho, J. M. Ribeiro and E. R. Orskov. 1993. A comparison of gas production during incubation with rumen contents in vitro digestibility in vitro and the voluntary intake of hays. Anim. Prod. 57:105-112.
  11. Larbi, A., J. W. Smith, I. O. Kurdi, I. O. Adekunle, A. M. Raji and D. O. Ladipo. 1998. Chemical composition, rumen degradation, and gas production characteristics of some multipurpose fodder trees and shrubs during wet and dry seasons in humid tropics. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 72:81-96.
  12. Lee, M. J., S. Y. Hwang and P. W. S. Chiou. 2000. Metabolizable energy of roughages in Taiwan. Small Rumin. Res. 36:251-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(99)00124-8
  13. Menke, K. H. and H. Steingass. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Res. Dev. 28:7-55.
  14. Menke, K. H., L. Raab, A. Salewski, H. Steingass, D. Fritz and W. Schneider. 1979. The estimation of digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedstuffs from the gas production when they incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.). 92:217-222.
  15. Minson, D. J. 1990. Forage in ruminant nutrition. Academic Press, New York.
  16. Mishra, A. S., O. H. Chaturvedi, Ananta, R. Khali, A. Prasad, A. K. Santra, S. Misra and R. C. Parthasarathy. 2000. Effect of sodium hydroxide and alkaline hydrogen peroxide treatment on physical and chemical characteristics and IVOMD of mustard straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 84:257-264.
  17. Misra, A. K., S. A. Karim, Verma, A. S. Mishra and M. K. Tripathi. 2000. Nutrient intake, its utilization, rumen fermentation pattern and blood bio-chemical constituents of sheep fed urea treated mustard (Brassica campestris) straw. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13(12):1674-1680.
  18. Morrison, J. M. 1980. Changes in the lignin and hemicellulose concentration of ten varieties of temperate grasses with increasing maturity. Grass Forage Sci. 32:287-293.
  19. Ndlovu, L. R. and F. V. Nherera. 1997. Chemical composition and relationship to in vitro gas production of Zimbabwean browsable indigenous tree species. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 69:121-129.
  20. Orskov, E. R and I. McDonald. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb). 92:499-503.
  21. Pearse, E. S. and H. O. Hartley. 1966. Biometrika tables for statisticians. 1:1-270. Cambridge University Press. UK.
  22. Stastica, 1993. Stastica for windows release 4.3, StatSoft, Inc. Tulsa, OK.
  23. Terry, R. A. and J. M. A. Tilley. 1964. The digestibility of the leaves and stems of perennial ryegrass, cocksfoot, timoty, tall fescue, Lucerne and sainfoin, as measured by an in vitro procedure. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 19:396-372.
  24. Tolera, A., K. Khazaal and E. R. Orskov. 1997. Nutritive evaluation of some browse species. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 67:181-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(96)01119-4
  25. Vaithiyanathan, S., S. K. S. Raghuvanshi, A. S. Mishra, M. K. Tripathi, A. K. Misra, R. Prasad and R. C. Jakhmola. 2003. Effect of feeding chemically treated mustard (Brassica campestris) straw on rumen fibre degrading enzymes in sheep. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16(11):1610-1613.
  26. Van Soest, P. J., J. D. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animals nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597.
  27. Van Soest, P. J. 1963. The use of detergents in the analysis of fibre feeds. II. A rapid method of determination of fibre and lignin. J. AOAC. 46:829-835.
  28. Wilson, J. R., H. Denium and E. M. Engels. 1991. Temperature effects on anatomy and digestibility of leaf and stem of tropical and temperate forage species. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 39:31-48.
  29. Zinash, S., E. Owen, M. S. Dhanoa and M. K. Theodorou. 1996. Prediction of in situ rumen dry matter disappearance of Ethiopian forages from an in vitro gas production technique using a pressure transducer, chemical analyses or in vitro digestibility. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 61:73-87.

Cited by

  1. Effect of Different Sowing Dates on the Growth and Yield of Canola (Sarson) Varieties vol.1, pp.6, 2002, https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2002.634.635
  2. Nutritive Value of Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciaefolia) Harvested at Different Maturity Stages vol.9, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2006.205.209
  3. Effect of Maturity on the Potential Nutritive Value of Burr Medic (Medicago polymorpha) Hay vol.7, pp.2, 2007, https://doi.org/10.3923/jbs.2007.300.304
  4. Quack Grass (Agropyron repens L.): As Ruminant Feed vol.2, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.3923/rjes.2008.228.233
  5. In vitro fermentation patterns and methane production of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) hay with different condensed tannin contents vol.66, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2011.00805.x
  6. Effects of Ensiling Alfalfa with Whole-crop Maize on the Chemical Composition and Nutritive Value of Silage Mixtures vol.19, pp.4, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.526
  7. Comparison of Gayal (Bos frontalis) and Yunnan Yellow Cattle (Bos taurus): In vitro Dry Matter Digestibility and Gas Production for a Range of Forages vol.20, pp.8, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1208
  8. Estimation of Ruminal Degradation and Intestinal Digestion of Tropical Protein Resources Using the Nylon Bag Technique and the Three-step In vitro Procedure in Dairy Cattle on Rice Straw Diets vol.20, pp.12, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1849