Differences in Density and Body Condition of Small Rodent Populations on Different Distance from Road

  • Hur, Wee-Haeng (Department of Forest Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Woo-Shin (Department of Forest Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Chang-Yong (Department of Forest Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Young-Su (Department of Forest Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Chang-Bae (Department of Forest Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Rhim, Shin-Jae (Department of Animal Science and Technology & BET Research Institute, Chung-Ang University)
  • Received : 2005.02.28
  • Accepted : 2005.04.20
  • Published : 2005.04.30

Abstract

This study was conducted to identify the road effect on small rodent populations within fragmented forest areas around the road from June to September 2002, in 9 study sites of Baekdugdaegan mountains, Korea. Two species of small rodents, Korean field mouse Apodemus peninsulae and striped field mouse Apodemus agrarius, were captured in this study. Korean field mouse preferred forest area, and striped field mouse generally has been found edge area around road. Mean body weight of Korean field mouse was significantly different, but that of striped field mouse was not between both distance from road. Korean field mouse is forest-dwelling species and their distribution is limited in forest area. In contrast, striped field mouse has wide distributional range around road. The effects of road is different in each small rodent species and their habitat preferences.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, R.C. and Katz, A.J. 1993. Recovery of browse-sensitive tree species following release from white-tailed deer Odocoileus virginianus browsing pressure. Biological Conservation 63: 203-208 https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(93)90713-B
  2. Bailie, J. and Croornbridge, B. 1996. IUCN red list of threatened animals. World Conservation Union. Gland. pp. 145
  3. Bellamy, P.E., Shore, R.F. and Ardeshir, D. 2000. Road verges as habitat for small mammal in Britain. Mammal Review 30: 131-139 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2907.2000.00061.x
  4. Forman, R.T.T. and Alexander, L.E. 1998. Roads and their major ecological effects. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics 29: 207-231 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.207
  5. Forman, R.T.T. and Deblinger, R.D. 2000. The ecological road-effect zone of a Massachusetts (U.S.A) suburban highway. Conservation Biology 14: 36-46 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99088.x
  6. Huijser, M.P. 2000. Life on the edge. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. pp. 165
  7. Huijser, M.P. and Piet, J.M. 2000. The effect of roads and traffic on hedgehog (Erinaceus europaeus) population. Biological Conservation 95: 111-116 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(00)00006-9
  8. Huijser, M. P., van der Grift, E. A. and Bekker, G. J. 1999. Habitat fragmentation and infrastructure: a review of the proceedings of a European and north American conference. Lutra 41: 43-54
  9. McGarigal, K., Romme, W.H., Crist, M. and Roworth, E. 2001. Cumulative effects of roads and logging on landscape structure in the San Juan Mountains, Colorado (USA). Landscape Ecology 16: 327-349 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011185409347
  10. Meunier, F.D., Verheyden, C., and Jouvcntin, V. 1999. Bird communities of highway verges: influence of adjacent habitat and roadside management. Acta Oecologia 20: 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1146-609X(99)80010-1
  11. Ministry of Environment. 2003. The research report on construction and management of eco-bridge. Ministry of Environment. Seoul. pp. 324
  12. Noss, R.F. and Cooperrider, A.Y. 1994. Saving nature's legacy. Island Press. Washington, D.C. pp. 380
  13. Paton, P.W.C. 1994. The effect of edge on aivan nest success; how strong is the evidence? Conservation Biology 8: 17-26 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08010017.x
  14. Rhim, S.J. 1997. Changes in breeding bird communities and small mammal populations due to different habitat structures. MS thesis of the Graduate School, Seoul National University. pp. 60
  15. Rhim, S.J. and Lee, W.S. 1998. Relationship between the density of small mammals and the habitat structure due to different altitude in Chiri National Park. Research Bulletin of the Seoul National University Forests, 34: 37-47
  16. Rhim, S.J. and Lee, W.S. 2001. Habitat preference of small rodents in deciduous forests of north-eastern South Korea. Mammal Study 26: 1-8 https://doi.org/10.3106/mammalstudy.26.1
  17. Shin, J.H. 2002. Ecosystem geography of Korea. In Ecology of Korea. pp. 19-46 Bumwoo Publishing Company. Seoul
  18. Williams, S.E., Marsh, H. and Winter J. 2002. Spatial scale, species diversity, and habitat structure: small mammals in Australian tropical rain forest. Ecology 83: 1317-1329
  19. Won, P.H. 1967. Illustrated encyclopedia of fauna and flora of Korea. Vol. 7 Mammal. Ministry of Education, Republic of Korea. Seoul. pp. 659