대한공업교육학회지

Korean Institute of Industrial Educations (대한공업교육학회)
권호 표지

The Relationship between the Multiple Intelligence and the Technological Problem Solving of Middle school students

중학생들의 다중지능과 기술적 문제해결력과의 관계

  • Published : 2005.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the relationship between the Multiple Intelligence and the technological problem solving and the differences between the two. There were a group of 200 third grade middle school students that were comprised of 100 boys and 100 girls and what the difference is exited between the boys and the girls. To measure the students' Multiple Intelligence, MI(Multiple Intelligent)Test designed by Youngrin, Moon was used. As the testing instrument of the Technological problem Solving, we use the test developed by National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Students Testing(CRESST). The results were; First, In comparison with the boys and girls' multiple intelligence part, there were individual differences in musical intelligence, bodily-kinesthetic intelligence, logical-mathematical intelligence, and naturalistic intelligence of multiple intelligence. Second, In comparison to the technological problem solving part, there were individual differences in self-regulation and there was a mild difference in understanding of the contents. Third, The multiple intelligence related with the self-regulation is continuous with logical-mathematical intelligence, intra-personal intelligence and linguistic intelligence. Fourth, The multiple intelligence related with the technological problem solving strategy is continuous with logical-mathematical intelligence and musical intelligence. Fifth, The multiple intelligence related with the understanding of the contents is continuous with the logical-mathematical intelligence and naturalistic intelligence. To improve the students' technological problem solving ability, it is required the development of the curriculum which focus on the improvement of logical-mathematical intelligence, musical intelligence, intra-personal intelligence, linguistic intelligence and naturalistic intelligence of the students.

Keywords

References

  1. 김명희,김양분. (1998). 중등학생의 다중지능 분석 . 교육논총,12,151-185 한양대학교
  2. 김봉환,김병석,정철영. (2000) 학교진로상담. 서울: 학지사
  3. 김정숙. (2001). 실업계고등학생의 직업가치 및 자기효능감과 진로생숙도의 관계. 미출판 석사학위논문,한국교원대학교
  4. 김주현 (2005). 다중지능이론에 기초한 진로교육프로그램 개발 연구. 미출판 박사학위 논문,서울대학교
  5. 김충기. (1986). 진로 교육과 진로지도. 서울: 배영사
  6. 류상아. (2003). 중학생들의 진로유형 및 진로성숙 수준과 다중지능과의 상관관계. 미출판 석사학위논문,부산대학교
  7. 문용린. (2003). MI 적성진로진단검사 실시요강. 서울: 대교 한국교육평가센터
  8. 문용린,김주현,박은실. (2003). 다중지능과 진로 의식 발달 연구 - 초등학생을 중심으로 서울대학교 교육학과 도덕심리연구실
  9. 문용린. (2004). 지력혁명. 서울: 비즈니스 북스
  10. 이길호. (2002). 중학생의 다중지능과 창의성 및 학업성취도의 관계. 미출판 석사학위 논문,한국교원대학교
  11. 조혜용. (2003). 다중지능이론을 이용한 고등학교 영어 읽기 지도, 미출판 석사학위논문,연세대학교
  12. 장석민. (1986). 진로 교육에 관한 문헌분석 연구. 한국교육개발원
  13. 최유현. (2005). 기술교과교육학. 형설출판사
  14. 하대현. (1998). H. Gardner의 다지능 이론의 교육적 적용: 그 가능성과 한계. 교육심리 연구, 12(1), 73-100
  15. Cater, H. D. (1940). The development of vocational attitudes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4, 185-191
  16. Crites, J. O. (1978). Career Maturity Inventory: Attitude Scale. Monterey. CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill
  17. Crites, J. O. (1981). Career counseling: Model, Methods and materials. New York: McGraw-Hill, Book Co.
  18. Dysinger, W. S. (1950). Maturation and vocational guidance. Occupations, 29, 198-201
  19. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: Theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books
  20. Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. NY: Basic Books
  21. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligence for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books
  22. Graver, A. (2000). Making connections: K-8 worksite learning activity packet. ERIC, ED444015
  23. Herl, H. E., O'Neil, H. F., Jr., Chung, G. K. W. K., Bianchi. C., Wang, S. L., Mayer, R., Lee, C. Y, Choi, A., Suen, T., & Tu, A. (1999). Final Report for Validation of Problem-solving Measures(CSE Tech. Rep. No. 501). Los Angeles, CA : University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing
  24. Mantzaris, J. A. (2001). How will adult diploma students' awareness of their own intelligences and their participation in activities informed by MI theory affect their career decision-making process? In S. Kallenbach & J. Viens (Eds.), Multiple intelligences in practice: Teacher research reports from the adult multiple intelligences study(134-143). ERIC, ED453386
  25. O'Neil, H. F., Jr. (1997). Test Specifications for Problem- solving Assessmenii: CSE Tech. Rep. No. 463). Los Angeles, CA : University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing
  26. Sohn, S. C. (2003). A method for introducing Gardner's theory of multiple intelligence to middle school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA
  27. Strong, E. K. Jr. (1943). Vocational interests of men and women. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press
  28. Super, D. E. (1955). Dimensions and measurement of vocational maturity. Teachers College Record, 57(3), 151-163