Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Dietary Biotite V Supplementation as an Alternative Substance to Antibiotics in Growing Pigs

  • Chen, Y.J. (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Kwon, O.S. (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Min, B.J. (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Son, K.S. (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Cho, J.H. (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Hong, J.W. (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, I.H. (Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University)
  • Received : 2005.02.01
  • Accepted : 2005.05.18
  • Published : 2005.11.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of Biotite V supplementation on growth performance, nutrients digestibility and blood constituents and to evaluate whether Biotite V could replace an antibiotics in growing pigs diet. One hundred twenty pigs with initial body weight of 18.35${\pm}$0.15 kg were used in a 28 days growth trial. Pigs were allotted to four treatments by sex and body weight in a randomized complete block design. There were six replicate pens per treatment and five pigs per pen. Four dietary treatments were: 1) NC (basal diet without antibiotics), 2) PC (basal diet+0.1% CTC), 3) NCBV (NC diet+0.5% 200 mesh Biotite V) and 4) PCBV (PC diet+0.5% 200 mesh Biotite V). Through the entire experimental period, ADG tented to increase in NCBV and PCBV treatments compared to NC and PC treatments respectively, but no significant differences were observed (p>0.05). ADFI was slightly lower in NCBV and PCBV treatments than that in NC and PC treatments without significant differences (p>0.05). Gain/feed in PC and PCBV treatments was improved significantly compared to NC treatment (p<0.05). N and Ca digestibilities were higher in PCBV treatments than those in PC treatment (p<0.05). DM and P digestibilities were not affected by the addition of Biotite V (p>0.05). RBC, HCT, Hb, lymphocyte and monocyte were increased numerically in NCBV and PCBV treatments compared to NC and PC treatments (p>0.05). WBC was lower in treatment groups than that in NC treatment, but no significant differences were observed (p>0.05). In conclusion, dietary supplementation of Biotite V can better the gain/feed and some of the nutrients digestibilities in growing pigs. It has a possibility to replace antibiotics in swine diet.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC. 1995. Official method of analysis. 16th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.
  2. Barton, M. D. 2000. Antibiotics use in animal feed and its impact on human health. Nut. Res. Rev. 13:1-22. https://doi.org/10.1079/095442200108728972
  3. Castro, M. and M. Iglesias. 1989. Effect of zeolite on traditional diets for fattening pigs. Cuban J. Agric. Sci. 23:289-291.
  4. Chen, Y. J., O. S. Kwon, B. J. Min, K. S. Shon, J. H. Cho and I. H. Kim. 2005. The effects of dietary Biotite V supplementation on growth performance, nutrients digestibility and fecal noxious gas content in finishing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:1147-1152.
  5. Corpet, D. E. 2000. Mechanism of antimicrobial growth promoters used in animal feed (French). Rev. Med. Vet. 151:99-104.
  6. Dupont, D. P., G. E. Duhamel, M. P. Carlson and M. R. Mathiesen. 1994. Effect of divalent cations on hemolysin synthesis by Serpulina (Treponema) hyodysenteriae: Inhibition induced by zinc and copper. Vet. Microbiol. 41:63-73.
  7. Hays, V. W. 1981. The Hays Report: Effectiveness of Feed Additive Usage of Antibacterial Agents in Swine and Poultry Production. Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress, Washington DC, and Rachelle Laboratories, Long Beach, CA.
  8. Hill, G. M., G. L. Cromwell, T. D. Crenshaw, C. R. Dove, R. C. Dove, R. C. Ewan, D. A. Knabe, A. J. Lewis, G. W. Libal, D. C. Mahan, G. C. Shurosn, L. L. Southern and T. L. Venum. 2000. Growth promotion effects and plasma changes from feeding high dietary concentrations of zinc and copper to weanling pigs (regional study). J. Anim. Sci. 78:1010-1016.
  9. Kiser, J. S. 1976. A perspective on the use of antibiotics in animal feeds. J. Anim. Sci. 42:1058-1072. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1976.4241058x
  10. Kwon, O. S., I. H. Kim, J. W. Hong, S. H. Lee, Y. K. Jung, B. J. Min and W. B. Lee. 2003. Effects of dietary germanium biotite in weaned, growing and finishing pigs. Korea J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 45:355-368.
  11. Mumpton, F. A. and P. H. Fishman. 1977. The application of natural zeolites in animal science and aquaculture. J. Anim. Sci. 45:1188-1203.
  12. NRC. 1998. Nutrient requirement of pigs. 10th Edition. National Research Council, Academy Press. Washington, DC.
  13. Pearson, G., W. C. Smith and J. M. Fox. 1985. Influence of dietary zeolite in pig performance over the weight range 25-78 kg. New Zealand J. Exp. Agric. 13:151-154.
  14. Pond, W. G. and J. T. Yen. 1983. Protection by clinoptilolite or zeolite NrA against cadmium-induced anemia in growing swine. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Mad. 173:332.
  15. Poulsen, H. D. and N. Oksbjerg. 1995. Effects of dietary inclusion of a zeolite (clinoptilolite) on performance and protein metabolism of young growing pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 53:297-303.
  16. Roof, M. D. and D. C. Mahan. 1982. Effect of carbadox and various dietary copper levels for weanling swine. J. Anim. Sci. 55:1109-1117.
  17. SAS. 1996. SAS user’s guide. Release 6.12 edition. SAS Institude. Inc Cary NC.
  18. Shurson, G. C., P. K. Ku, E. R. Miller and M. T. Yokoyama. 1984. Effects of zeolite or clinoptilolite in diets of growing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 59:1536-1545.
  19. Stahly, T. S., G. L. Cromwell and H. J. Monegue. 1980. Effects of the dietary inclusion of copper and (or) antibiotics on the performance of weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 51:1347-1351.
  20. Taylor, D. J. 1997. A realistic assessment of the risks of antimicrobial use in animals and its effects on feed safety. Pig J. 40:46-59.
  21. Thacker, P. A. 2003. Performance of growing-finishing pigs fed diets containing graded levels of biotite, an alumninosilicate clay. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:1666-1672. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2003.1666
  22. Watkins, K. L., D. B. Vagnoni and L. L. Southm. 1989. Effect of dietary sodium zeolite A and excess calcium on growth and tibia calcium and phosphorus in uninfected and Eimeria acervulina-infected chicks. Poult. Sci. 68:1236.
  23. Yuan, S. L., X. S. Piao, D. F. Li, Y. H. He and X. H. Guo. 2004. Effects of Biotite V on Growth Performance and Serum Lymphocyte Proliferation in Weaned Piglets. National Feed Engineering Technology Research Center, China Agricultural University (Unpublished).

Cited by

  1. Dietary germanium biotite supplementation enhances the induction of antibody responses to foot-and-mouth disease virus vaccine in pigs vol.15, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.4142/jvs.2014.15.3.443
  2. Modulation of Macrophage Activities in Proliferation, Lysosome, and Phagosome by the Nonspecific Immunostimulator, Mica vol.10, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117838
  3. Clays as dietary supplements for swine: A review vol.6, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-015-0037-9
  4. Alternatives to antibiotics as growth promoters for use in swine production: a review vol.4, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-1891-4-35
  5. Probiotic effects of marine Debaryomyces hansenii CBS 8339 on innate immune and antioxidant parameters in newborn goats pp.1432-0614, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09621-5
  6. Effects of Dietary Hizikia fusiformis on Growth and Immune Responses in Juvenile Olive Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) vol.19, pp.12, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1769
  7. Effects of L-carnitine, Selenium-enriched Yeast, Jujube Fruit and Hwangto (Red Clay) Supplementation on Performance and Carcass Measurements of Finishing Pigs vol.19, pp.2, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.217
  8. Dietary Requirement of True Digestible Phosphorus and Total Calcium for Growing Pigs vol.20, pp.8, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2007.1236
  9. Effects of Anion Supplementation on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Meat Quality and Fecal Noxious Gas Content in Growing-finishing Pigs vol.23, pp.8, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2010.90609
  10. Strategies to augment non-immune system based defence mechanisms against gastrointestinal diseases in pigs vol.58, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2011.04.001
  11. Effects of dietary supplementation of sericite on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles and fecal microflora shedding in growing pigs vol.184, pp.1, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.04.010
  12. Dietary Effect of Artificial Zeolite on Performance, Immunity, Faecal Microflora Concentration and Noxious Gas Emissions in Pigs vol.13, pp.4, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.3404
  13. Effect of dietary supplemental medium chain fatty acids instead of antibiotics on the growth performance, digestibility and blood profiles in growing pigs vol.103, pp.6, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.13175
  14. Influence of Enterococcus faecium with and without xylanase to corn and soybean meal-based diet on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, and faecal microflora in growing pigs vol.48, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2020.1828892
  15. Effects of dietary silicate levels on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microflora, odorous gas emissions, blood characteristics, and foot and mouth disease antibodies in weaning to fi vol.100, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2019-0200
  16. Effects of the supplementation of a calcium soap containing medium‐chain fatty acids on the fecal microbiota of pigs, lactating cows, and calves vol.92, pp.1, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13636
  17. Amelioration of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli-induced disruption of intestinal epithelium by manno-oligosaccharide in weaned pigs vol.82, pp.None, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2021.104492
  18. Maximum levels of cross‐contamination for 24 antimicrobial active substances in non‐target feed. Part 12: Tetracyclines: tetracycline, chlortetracycline, oxytetracycline, and doxycycline vol.19, pp.10, 2005, https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6864
  19. Manno-oligosaccharide attenuates inflammation and intestinal epithelium injury in weaned pigs upon enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli K88 challenge vol.126, pp.7, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114520004948