The Change of Bone and Soft Tissue Profile after Sagittal Split Osteotomy of Ramus

하악골후방이동술 후 골격구조와 연부조직의 변화

  • Hwang, Jee Hoon (Institution for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Seul, Chul Hwan (Institution for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Beyoung Yun (Institution for Human Tissue Restoration, Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 황지훈 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실, 인체조직복원연구소) ;
  • 설철환 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실, 인체조직복원연구소) ;
  • 박병윤 (연세대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실, 인체조직복원연구소)
  • Received : 2005.06.13
  • Published : 2005.09.10

Abstract

Orthognathic surgery for Class III malocclusion requires an elaborate preoperative planning using cephalometries or Mock surgery models which enable the surgeon to anticipate postoperative skeletal changes of maxilla and mandible as well as dentition. After surgery, patient's satisfaction is greatly influenced by appearance of soft tissue change. Therefore, it is imperative to predict a relatively accurate soft tissue change prior to surgery. A 5 year retrospective study was designed to evaluate the soft tissue change after sagittal split osteotomy of ramus(SSRO) for class III malocclusion. Analyses of preoperative and postoperative anthropometric measurements were performed. Patients who were treated only by SSRO for class III malocclusion and could follow up for 6 months were studied. Among them, the patients who had history of cleft palate and lip or hemifacial microsomia were excluded. Soft tissue changes were estimated by using the frontal and lateral photographs. Skeletal changes were observed by measuring amount of set back and angular changes of mandible to the reference line by using cephalometries. Relapses were also measured 6 months after the operation. We could observe skeletal changes were more profound than soft tissue changes concerning amount of set back, but soft tissue changes were also profound in angle. Relapse was more profound in skeleton than soft tissue but the amount was not significant. In spite of the variables which may affect proper assessment of the soft tissue change after skeletal relocation, this study can serve as a guide for exact prediction of the postoperative change of soft tissue and skeleton.

Keywords

References

  1. Mobarak KA, Krogstad O, Espeland L, Lyberg T: Factors influencing the predictability of soft tissue profile changes following mandibular setback surgery. Angle Orthod 71: 216, 2001
  2. GjOrup H, Athanasiou AE: Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 100: 312, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(91)70068-8
  3. Gaggle A, Schultes G, Karcher H: Changes in soft tissue profile after sagittal split osteotomy and retropositioning of the mandible. J Oral Maxillary Surg 57: 542, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(99)90072-1
  4. Hershey HG, Smith LH: Soft tissue profile change associated with surgical correction of the prognathic mandible. Am J Orthod 65: 483, 1974 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(74)90031-1
  5. Mobarak KA, Krogstad O, Espeland L, Lyberg T: Longterm stability of mandibular setback surgery: A follow up of 80 bilateral sagittal split osteotomy patients. Int J Adult Orthod-Orthog Surg 15: 83, 2000
  6. Kang MH, Park SH, Koh KS, Yoon KC, Park IK: Stability after surgical correction of mandibular prognathism using bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with rigid fixation. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 30: 363, 2003