DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Wear of Resin Composites Polymerized by Conventional Halogen Light Curing and Light Emitting Diodes Curing Units

Halogen Light Curing Unit과 Light Emitting Diodes Curing Unit을 이용하여 중합되어진 복합레진의 마멸 특성 비교

  • 이권용 (세종대학교 의공학연구소) ;
  • 김환 (세종대학교 기계공학과) ;
  • 박성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 보건학교실) ;
  • 정일영 (연세대학교 치과대학 보건학교실) ;
  • 전승범 (㈜알앤비)
  • Published : 2005.12.01

Abstract

In this study, the wear characteristics of five different dental composite resins cured by conventional halogen light and LED light sources were investigated. Five different dental composite resins of Surefil, Z100, Dyract AP, Fuji II LC and Compoglass were worn against a zirconia ceramic ball using a pin-on-disk type wear tester with 15N contact force in a reciprocal sliding motion of sliding distance of 10mm/cycle at 1Hz under the room temperature dry condition. The wear variations of dental composite resins were linearly increased as the number of cycles increased. It was observed that the wear resistances of these specimens were in the order of Dyract AP > Surefil > Compoglass > Z100 > Fuji II LC. On the morphological observations by SEM, the large crack formation on the sliding track of Fuji II LC specimen was the greatest among all resin composites. Dyract AP showed less wear with few surface damage. There is no significant difference in wear performance between conventional halogen light curing and light emitting diodes curing sources. It indicates that a light emitting diodes (LED) source can replace a halogen light source as curing unit for composite resin restorations.

Keywords

References

  1. F. Lutz, R.W. Phillips, J.F. Roulet and J.C. Setcos, 'In vivo and in vitro wear of potential posterior composites,' J. Dental Research, Vol. 63, pp. 914-920, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630062201
  2. S.H. Park, 'Comparison of degree of conversion for light-cured and additionally heat-cured composite,' J. Prosthetic Dentistry, Vol. 76, pp. 613-618, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90439-4
  3. H. Suzuki, M. Taira, K. Wakasa and M. Yamaki, 'Refractive-index-adjustable fillers for visible-lightcured dental resin composites: preparation of $TiO_{2}-SiO_{2}$ glass powder by the sol-gel process,' J. Dental Research, Vol. 70, pp. 883-888, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700050401
  4. R.W. Wassell, J.F. McCabe and A.W.G. Walls, 'A two-body frictional wear test,' J. Dental Research, Vol. 73, pp. 1546-1553, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345940730091001
  5. M.A. Vargas, D.S. Cobb and J.L. Schmit, 'Polymerization of composite resins: Argon laser vs conventional light,' Operative Dentistry, Vol. 23, pp. 87-93, 1998
  6. R.J. Blankenau, G.L. Powell, W.P. Kelsey and W.W. Barkmeier, 'Post-polymerization strength values of an argon laser cured resin,' Lasers in Surgery Medicine, Vol. 11, pp. 471-474, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900110513
  7. A. Peutzfeldt, A. Sahafi, and E. Asmussen, 'Characterization of resin composites polymerized with plasma arc curing units,' Dental Materials, Vol. 16, pp. 330-336, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00025-7
  8. S.H. Park, I. Krejci and F. Lutz, 'Microhardness of resin composites polymerized by plasma arc or conventional visible light curing,' Operative Dentistry, Vol. 27, pp. 30-37, 2002