Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition (한국식품영양과학회지)

The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition (한국식품영양과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of MSM (Methyl Sulfonyl Methane) Supplementation on Growth Performance and Digestibility of Ca and N in Pigs

식이유황 MSM(Methyl Sulfonyl Methane) 급여가 돼지의 성장 및 질소와 칼슘 소화율에 미치는 영향

  • Cho, J.H. (Dept. of Animal Resource ＆ Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Min, B.J. (Dept. of Animal Resource ＆ Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Kwon, O.S. (Dept. of Animal Resource ＆ Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Shon, K.S. (Dept. of Animal Resource ＆ Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Jin, Y.G. (Dept. of Animal Resource ＆ Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, H.J. (Dept. of Animal Resource ＆ Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, I.H. (Dept. of Animal Resource ＆ Sciences, Dankook University)
  • 조진호 (단국대학교 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 민병준 (단국대학교 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 권오석 (단국대학교 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 손경승 (단국대학교 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 진영걸 (단국대학교 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 김해진 (단국대학교 동물자원과학과) ;
  • 김인호 (단국대학교 동물자원과학과)
  • Published : 2005.03.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

For the EXP 1, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of MSM (methyl sulfonyl methane) supplementation on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in pigs. Sixty crossbred (Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc) pigs (48.15±0.15㎏ average initial body weight) were used in a 35 days growth assay. Dietary treatments included 1) Control (basal diet), 2) T1 (basal diet＋0.01% MSM) and 3) T2 (basal diet＋0.02% MSM). For overall period, average daily gain, average daily feed intake and feed efficiency were not significantly different among the treatments (p＆gt;0.05). Digestibilies of DM, N, Ca and P were not significant defferences (p＆gt;0.05). For the EXP 2, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of MSM and antibiotic supplementation on growth performance and nutrient digestibility in pigs. One hundred crossbred (Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc) pigs (33.85±0.15㎏ average initial body weight) were used in a 42 days growth assay. Dietary treatments included 1) Control (basal diet), 2) T1 (basal diet＋0.05% neomycin sulfate, 0.055% oxytetracycline), 3) T2 (Con diet＋0.01% MSM) and T3 (T1＋0.01% MSM). For overall period, average daily gain and average daily feed intake of pigs fed T3, T2 diets were higher than those of CON diet (p＆lt;0.05). Average daily gain was not significantly different between T2 and T3. However, food efficiency of pigs fed CON was the highest among the treatments (p＆lt;0.05). Pigs fed T3 diet increased nutrient digestibility compared to other treatments (p＆lt;0.05). In conclusion, the results suggest that the dietary addition of MSM and antibiotics into diets for pigs affect growth performance and nutrient digestibility.

본 연구는 식용유황으로 사용되고 있는 MSM(methyl sulfonyl methane)을 돼지 식이에 첨가하였을 때 성장 능력과 영양소 소화율에 미치는 영향을 평가하기 위하여 실시하였다. 시 험 1에서 는 3원 교잡종(Landrace × Yorkshire × Duroc) 육성돈 60두를 공시하였으며 시험개시시의 체중은 48.15±0.15㎏이었고 35일간 실시하였다. 시험설계는 옥수수-대두박 위주의 식이로서 처리한 대조구(Cotrol: 대조구), 대조구 식이 내 MSM 0.01%(T1: 대조구＋0.01% MSM), 0.02%(T2: 대조구＋0.02% MSM)로 3처리를 하여 처리당 5반복, 반복당 5마리씩 완전임의 배치하였다. 일당증체량과 일당식이섭취량은 T1 처리구가 높은 경향을 보였으나 유의적인 차이는 없었다(p＆gt;0.05). 식이효율과 영양소 소화율 역시 처리구간에 유의적인 차이가 없었다(p＆gt;0.05). 시험 2에서는 3원 교잡종 육성돈 100두를 공시하였으며, 시험 개시시 체중은 38.85±0.15㎏이었다. 시험설계는 옥수수-대두박 위주의 기초식이 대조구(CON), 대조구 식이에 황산네오마이신 0.05%, OTC(oxytetracycline) 0.05% 첨가구(T1), 대조구 식이에 MSM 0.01% 첨가구(T2) 및 대조구 식이에 황산네오마이신 0.05%, OTC 0.05%와 MSM 0.01% 첨가구(T3)로 4개 처리로 하였다. 일당증체량은 MSM 0.01% 첨가한 T2구와 항생제와 MSM 0.01% 첨가한 T3구가 유의적으로 높았다(p＆lt;0.05). 일당식이섭취 량에서 는 T2 처리구와 T3 처리구에서 증가함을 보였다(p＆lt;0.05). 식이효율은 대조구에서 가장 높은 경향을 보였다(p＆lt;0.05). 결론적으로, 실험 1과 2에서 알 수 있듯이 돼지에 있어 사료내 MSM의 첨가는 성장율을 향상시킬 것으로 기대되고 앞으로 많은 연구가 필요할 것으로 사료되며 항생제와의 혼합 첨가는 성장율과 영양소 소화율을 향상시키는 효과가 있을 것으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Pearson TW, Dawson HJ, Lackey HB. 1981. Natural occuning levels of dimethyl sulfoxide in selected fruits, vegetables, grains, and beverages. J Agric Food Chem 29: 1081-1091
  2. Block E. 1986. The art and science. In Folk medicine. Steiner RP, ed. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC. p 125-137
  3. Block E. 1992. The organosulfur chemistry of the genus allium-Implications for the organic chemistry of sulfur. Angew Chem Int Fd Engi 31: 1135-1178 https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.199211351
  4. Kumar M, Berwal JS. 1998. Sensitivity of food pathogens to garlic (Allium satiuum). J Appl Microbiol 84: 213-215 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00327.x
  5. Choi JH, Han IK. 1974. Effects of substitution of sodium on sodium sulphate for methionine on performance and nutrient metabolism of broiler chickens. Korea J Ani Sci 16: 20 36
  6. Sasse CE, Baker DR. 1974. Factors affecting sulphatesulphur utilization by young chick. Poultry Sci 53: 652-670 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0530652
  7. Hawbaker JA, Diaz F, Speer VC, Hay and Catron DV. 1960. The effect of oleandomycin on the performance of the young growing pigs. J Anim Sci 19: 938-945 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1960.193938x
  8. Hay VW. 1978. The role of antibiotics in efficient livestock production. In Nurt. and Drug Interrelations. Hathcock JN, Coon J, eds. Academic Press, NY. p 545
  9. Wachholz DE, Heidenriech CJ. 1970. Effect of tyrosne on swine growth in two environment. J Anim Sci 31: 1014 1021
  10. FEDESA. 1998. The use of antibiotics in animals (internet communication). Available at hppt://www.fedesa.be/eng/PublicSite/xtra/ABKit/abkit.htm
  11. Crum RC Jr. 1971. Complementory action of neoterramycin in pig starter ration. Proc. of Pfizer 19th Anu. Res. Conf. p 22
  12. Hawbaker JA. 1966. The effect of neoterramycin on broilers and weanling pigs. Proc. of Pfizer 14th Anu. Res. Conf. p 58
  13. Cromwell GL, Stahly TS, Speer VC, Kelly RO. 1984. Efficacy of nosiheptide as a growth promoter for growingfinishing swine. J Anim Sci 59: 1125 1140 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.5951125x
  14. NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirement of Swine. 10th ed. National Academy Press, Washington DC, USA. p 110
  15. AOAC. 1995. Official Method of Analysis. 16th ed. Association of official analytical chemists, Washington, DC, USA. p 152-164
  16. SAS. 1996. SAS User Guide. Release 6.12 ed. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA
  17. Duncan DB. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometerics 11: 1-42 https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  18. Lovett TD, Coffey MT, Miles RD, Combs GE. 1986. Methionine, choline and sulphate interrelationships in the diet of weanling swine. J Anim Sci 63: 467-471 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1986.632467x
  19. Miller D, Biddle GN, Bauersfeld Jr, Cuppett SL. 1974. Soybean meal diets supplemented with sulphate, methionine and fishery products. Poultry Sci 53: 226-234 https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0530226
  20. Michels FG, Smith JT. 1965. A comparison of the utilization of organic and inorganic sulphur by rat. J Nurt 87: 217-222
  21. Hay VW, Muir WM. 1979. Efficacy and safety of feed additive ues of antibacterial drugs in animal production. Can J Anim Sci 59: 447-458 https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas79-055
  22. Noh SH, Moon HK, Han IK, Shin IS. 1995. Effect of dietary growth promoting substances on growth performance in pigs. Korean J Anim Sci 37: 66-72
  23. Min TS, Han IK, Chung IB, Kim IB. 1992. Effects of dietary supplementation with antibiotics, sulfur compound, copper sulfate, enzyme and probiotics on the growing performance and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing pigs. Kor J Anim Nurt Feed 16: 265-274
  24. Yoo MI, Han IK, Kwon K, Sohn KS, Kang SW. 1985. Growth-stimulating effect of virginiamycin for growingfinishing swine. Kor J Anim Sci 27: 284-287

Cited by

  1. Changes in Physicochemical, Microbiological and Sensory Properties of Dry-Cured Ham in Processed Sulfur-Fed Pigs vol.39, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12293
  2. Enhancement of physicochemical, microbiological and sensory properties of dry-cured loin by using processed sulfur-fed pigs vol.56, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1071/AN14680
  3. Beneficial dietary effect of turmeric and sulphur on weight gain, fat deposition and lipid profile of serum and liver in rats vol.51, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-011-0569-8
  4. Effect of Dietary Processed Sulfur Supplementation on Texture Quality, Color and Mineral Status of Dry-cured Ham vol.35, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.5.660
  5. Effects of dietary methyl sulfonyl methane (MSM) supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, excreta microbiota, excreta gas emission, and blood profiles in broilers vol.96, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew480
  6. Effects of Dietary Organic Sulfur on Performance, Egg Quality and Cell-mediated Immune Response of Laying Hens vol.45, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5536/KJPS.2018.45.2.97
  7. 피부질환 원인균에 대한 자몽종자추출물과 법제유황수의 항균 효과 vol.19, pp.1, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5352/jls.2009.19.1.094
  8. 구강질환 원인균에 대한 자몽종자추출물과 법제유황수 함유 치약시제품의 향균효과 vol.19, pp.7, 2005, https://doi.org/10.5352/jls.2009.19.7.956
  9. 천년초 추출물과 식이유황의 첨가가 계란의 생산성, 품질 및 관능적 특성에 미치는 영향 vol.39, pp.2, 2005, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2010.39.2.294
  10. Effects of sulphur type and concentration on growth performance, body composition and resistance of juvenile sea cucumber (Apostichopus japonicus) subjected to air and low salinity exposure stressors vol.52, pp.6, 2005, https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15097