Need and Significance of STS Education at the University Level

  • Published : 2005.10.31

Abstract

The study purported to develop STS education course material at the university level in order to enhance science literacy and understanding of the relationships among science, technology and society. A developed STS course was provided to 265 freshmen and sophomore students, majoring in the Humanities and the Social Sciences, the Natural Sciences and Engineering, and Fine Arts. Students participated in the survey examining changes in students' attitudes toward and perspectives on STS before and after the implementation. Ten questionnaires were selected from VOSTS for the survey. One additional questionnaire asked the students to elaborate their opinions on the need for a STS education course. The responses to the survey were analyzed according to types of questions and students' majors. As result, the developed STS course significantly increased students' science literacy. Among the participants, 97.7% responded that there is a need for STS education and provided reasons for such need. These results imply that there is a definite need for a STS class at the university level. According to the analyses of responses, there were different responses depending on the students' major. These differences imply that the major, academic background, level of interest in science, and knowledge of science of the students affect their perceptions on identifying the need for a STS education course.

Keywords

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The Development of a New Instrument: 'Views on Science-Technology-Society' (VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477-497 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730760503
  2. Bradford, C. S., Rubba, P. A., & Harkness, W. L. (1995). Views about science-technology-society interactions held by college students in general education Physics and STS course. Science Education, 79(4), 355-373 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730790402
  3. Cho, H., & Choi, K. (2000). Science teaching-learning evaluation. Seoul: Kyohaksa
  4. Choi, K. (1996). STS Education: Understanding and Application. Seoul: Kyohaksa
  5. Choi, K., & Cho, H. (2001). Educational issues on ethics of biotechnology-with focus on STS. Journal of the Korean Bioethics Association, 2(2), 175-193
  6. Choi, K., & Kim, M. (2001). Monitoring science education. In Science & Technology Policy Institute (STEPI)(Ed.). Revision of national science technology activities for consequence of world science conference, pp 134-154. Seoul : STEPI, Korean National Commission for UNESCO
  7. Fullick, P., & Ratcliffe, M.(Eds.) (1996). Teaching Ethical Aspects of Science. Southampton: The Bassett Press
  8. Hurd, P. D. (2000). Science Education for the 21st Century. School Science & Mathematics, 100(6), 282-288 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2000.tb17321.x
  9. Jung, W., Kwon, Y., & Kim, Y. (1993). The trend analysis of Korea STS education movement and a survey study on applying STS education in Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 13(1), 66-79
  10. Noh, T., & Kang, S. (1997). The effects of the 'General science course on the students' views about science-technology-society relationship and their perceptions of science classroom environment. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 17(4), 395-403
  11. Roy, R., & Waks, L. J. (1985). The A, B, Co's of Science, Technology and Society. FORUM, 8(4), 1-4
  12. Rubba, P. A., Schoneweg, C., & Harkness, W. L. (1996). A new scoring procedure for the views on science-technology-society instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 387-400 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180401
  13. Vazquez-Alonso, A., & Manassero-Mas, M. A. (1999). Response and scoring models for the 'Views on Science-Technology-Society' instrument. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 231-247 https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290679
  14. Ziman, J. (1980). Teaching and learning about science and technology. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press