처리기술 수준에 근거한 배출허용기준 설정을 위한 BAT 도입 연구

Assessment of the Best Available Technology to Establish the Industrial Wastewater Effluent Limitations Guidelines

  • Lim, Byung-Jin (Emission Sources Research Division, National Institute of Environment Research) ;
  • Kwon, O-Sang (Emission Sources Research Division, National Institute of Environment Research) ;
  • Kim, Young-Noh (Emission Sources Research Division, National Institute of Environment Research)
  • 발행 : 2005.09.30

초록

폐수배출시설별 BAT 평가제도는 폐수특성을 고려한 배출시설별 배출허용기준 설정, 오염총량관리기본계획 및 시행계획에 따른 오염부하삭감 가능량 산정, 신규오염물질에 대한 배출허용기준 산정 등 효율적인 산업폐수관리를 위해서 도입할 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 외국사례와 국내 폐수배출시설들의 현황 등을 조사하여 국내여건에 적합한 BAT 평가방안을 제시하였다. 본 평가절차의 핵심은 폐수배출시설별 처리시설에 대한 환경인자, 경제적 수용가능성, 기술적 인자 및 경제성 등을 객관성 있고 전문적인 판단이 가능토록 한데 있다. 본 BAT 평가방안은 처리수준에 근거한 폐수배출시설별 배출허용기준마련 및 오염총량관리를 위한 기초 자료로 활용할 수 있으며, 신규오염물질 및 유해오염물질의 배출허용기준 마련 등 정책적${\cdot}$법적 제도개선에 유용하게 활용할 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

BAT (Best Available Technology economically achievable) assessment is indispensible to effective management policy of industrial wastewater discharging facilities such as setting effluent limitations guidelines for individual industry based on the wastewater characteristics and treatment efficiency, making effluent limitations guidelines for new sources, and calculation of the reducible amount of emission load conforming to a total emission general plan and enforcement plan. This study reviewed foreign cases of BAT assessment and condition of domestic wastewater discharging facilities, and suggested BAT assessment guideline suitable for the domestic conditions. The major assessment factors and flow are; (1) Identification of pollution source characteristics, (2) Identification and survey on technology, (3) Selection of candidate technology, (4) Assessment of legislation adaptation, (5) Assessment of environmental factor, (6) Assessment of economical acceptability, (7) Total weighting value factor assessment on technological factor, and (8) Total assessment and final BAT selection. The result of this study can be utilized as a major policy data and a base of industrial wastewater management system.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 환경부, 2002. 차세대핵심환경기술개발사업 10개년 종합계획
  2. European Commission (EC), 2001. The Impact of Best Available Techniques (BAT) on the Competitiveness of European Industry
  3. European Commission (EC), 2002. Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, Draft Reference Document on Economics and Cross-Media Effects
  4. Hill, R., S. Lepow, M. Levine, J. Michaud, S. Neugeboren, C. Siciliano and R. Witt. 1996. OUTLINE OF CLEAN WATER ACT, October 1
  5. IPPC. 1998. Draft Reference Document on Best Available Techniques in Iron and Steel industry, E.C. Joint Research Centre
  6. IPPC. 2000a. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Pulp and Paper industry I, E.C. Joint Research Centre
  7. IPPC. 2000b. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Pulp and Paper industry II, E.C. Joint Research Centre
  8. IPPC. 2001a. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Tanning of Hides and Skins, E.C. Joint Research Centre
  9. IPPC. 2001b. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Textiles Industry I, E.C. Joint Research Centre
  10. IPPC. 2001c. Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Textiles Industry II, E.C. Joint Research Centre
  11. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). 1997. Standard, Application of Best Available Technology for Radioactive Effluent Control
  12. U.S .EPA. 1986. Quality Criteria for Water
  13. U.S. EPA. 1997a. Development Document for the Proposed Effluent limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Category
  14. U.S. EPA. 1997b. Economic Analysis for the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants dor Source Category: Pulp, Paper, and Paper Production; Effluent Limitations Guidelines, Pretreatment Standards, and New Source Performance Standards: Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard Category - Phase 1
  15. U.S. EPA. 1998a. Development Document for Final Effluent limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Point Source Category
  16. U.S. EPA. 1998b. Economic Analysis of Final Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry
  17. U.S. EPA. 2000a. Development Document for the Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point Source Category
  18. U.S. EPA. 2000b. Environmental Assessment of the Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines for the Iron and Steel Manufacturing Point Source Category
  19. U.S. EPA. 2000c. Technical Development Document for the Final Action Regarding Pretreatment Standards for the Industrial Laundries Point Source Category
  20. U.S. EPA. 2000d. Economic Assessment for Final Action Regarding Pretreatment Standards for the Industrial Laundries Point Source Category
  21. U.S. EPA. 2002a. Development Document for the Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Meat and Poultry Products Industry Point Source Category
  22. U.S. EPA. 2002b. Economic and Environmental Benefits Analysis of the Final Meat and Poultry Products Rule
  23. U.S. EPA. 2002c. National Recommended Water Quality Criteria, Human Health Criteria Calculation Matrix
  24. U.S. EPA. 2003a. Development Document for the Proposed Effluent limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Metal Products and Machinery Point Source Category
  25. U.S. EPA. 2003b. Economic, Environmental and Benefits Analysis of the Final Metal Products & Machinery Rule
  26. U.S. EPA. 2003c. Development Document for the Centralized Waste Treatment Point Source Category
  27. U.S. EPA. 2003d. Economic Analysis of Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Centralized Waste Treatment Industry
  28. U.S. EPA. 2003e. Environmental Assessment for the Final Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for New and Existing Sources and New Source Performance Standards for the Centralized Waste Treatment Point Source Category
  29. U.S. EPA. 2004a. Technical Development Document for the Proposed Effluent limitations Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards for the Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production Point Source Category
  30. U.S. EPA. 2004b. Economic and Environmental Impact Analysis of the Proposed Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for the Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production Industry