Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

The effect of osteotome technique on primary implant stability according to implant fixture diameter

임플란트 일차 안정성에 있어서 고정체 지름에 따른 osteotome 술식의 효과

  • Kim, Su-Hyun (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Kangnung National University)
  • 김수현 (강릉대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 이재관 (강릉대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 박찬진 (강릉대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Published : 2005.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Primary stability is a fundamental criteria of implant success. There has been various trials to increase initial stability and bone to implant contact. The objective of osteotome technique is to preserve all the existing bone by minimizing or even eliminating the drilling sequence of the surgical protocol. The bone layer adjacent to the osteotomy site is progressively compacted with various bone condensers(osteotomes) this will result in a denser bone to implant contact. This improved bone density helps to optimize primary implant stability in low density bone. The use of wide implant is one of methods to increse primary stability. They can be used in special situations in which they can increase the surface area available for implant anchorage and improve their primary stability The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the osteotome technique and implant width on primary stability. Osteotome technique was compared with conventional drilling method by resonance frequency measurments according to the implant fixtures diameter. The results were as follows: 1. The average of ISQ value was sightly higher in osteotome technique, but there was not statistically significant in regular and narrow implant(p <0.05). 2. Either osteotome technique or conventional technique. ISQ value was significantly higer as increasing of implant diameter(p <0.05). 3. ISQ value of drilling technique was higer than those of osteotome technique in wide implant. It was assumed to be caused by difference in final preparation diameter.

Keywords

References

  1. Jemt T. Lekholm U. Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989:4:211-7
  2. Jemt T. Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: a 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993:8:635-40
  3. Lekholm U. Gunne J. Henry P, Higuchi K. Linden U, Bergstrom C, van Steenberghe D. Survival of the Branemark implant in partially edentulous jaws: a 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999: 14:639-45
  4. Noack N, Willer J, Hoffmann J. Long-term results after placement of dental implants: longitudinal study of 1,964 implants over 16 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999: 14:748-55
  5. Martinez H, Davarpanah M. Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001: 12:423-32 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x
  6. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants: a study from stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991:6: 142-6
  7. Buchter A, Kleinheinz J. Joos U, Meyer U. Primary implant stability with differentbone surgery techniques. An in vitro study of the mandible of the minipig. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2003:7:351-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-003-0504-x
  8. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The osteotome technique. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1994: 15: 152-160
  9. Summers RB. The osteotome technique. Part 2 The ridge expansion osteotomy(REO) procedure. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1994: 15:422-426
  10. Summers RB. The osteotome technique. Part 3 Future site development. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1994: 15:698-708
  11. Summers RB. The osteotome technique. Part 4 Future site development. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1995; 16: 1090-1094
  12. Yildirim M, Edelhoff D, Hanisch O, Spiekermann H. The internal sinus lift-An adequate alternative to the conventional sinus floor elevation. Zeischr Zahnarztl Implantol 1998: 14: 124-135
  13. Nkenke E, Kloss F, Wiltfang J, Radespiel-Troger M, Loos K, Neukam FW. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic analysis of bone remodelling after installation of implants using an osteotome technique. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002: 13 : 595-602 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130604.x
  14. Langer B, Langer L, Herrmann I, Jorneus L. The wide fixture: a solution for special bone situations and a rescue for the compromised implant. Part 1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993:8:400-8
  15. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Johansson C, Rangert B, Lekholm U. Influence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997 :26: 141-8
  16. Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, Bertrom C, Lekholm U. Influence of varia-ons in implant diameters: a 3-to 5-year retroective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14: 173-80. FULL
  17. Renouard F, Arnoux JP, Sarment DP. Five-mrn-diameter implants without a smooth surface collar: report on 98 consetive placements. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14: 101-7
  18. Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Kebir M. Etienne D, Tecucianu JF. Wide-diameter implants: new concepts. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001: 21: 149-59
  19. Aparicio C, Orozco P. Use of 5-mm-diameter implants: Periotest values related to a clinical andradiographic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:398-406 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.090605.x
  20. Shin SW. Bryant SR, Zarb GA. A retrospective study on the treatment outcome of wide-bodied implants. Int J Prosthodont. 2004 ; 17: 52-8
  21. Adell R. Lekholm U, RockIer B, Brånemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981; 10: 387-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  22. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA. Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981: 52: 155-70 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  23. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11 : 491-501
  24. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Linden B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U. Stability measurements of one-stage Branemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical-resonance frequency analysis study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999:28:266-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(99)80156-8
  25. Sennerby L, Meredith N. Resonance frequency analysis: measuring implant stability and osseointegration. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998: 19:493-8, 500, 502
  26. Glauser R. Sennerby L, Meredith N, Ree A, Lundgren A, Gottlow J, Hammerle CH. Resonance frequency analysis of implants subjected to immediate or early functional occlusal loading. Successful vs. failing implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004: 15:428-34 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01036.x
  27. Derhami K, Wolfaardt JF, Faulkner G, Grace M. Assessment of the periotest device in baseline mobility measurements of craniofacial implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995: 10:221-9
  28. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Senner by L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997:8: 226-33 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080309.x
  29. Meredith N, Shagaldi F, Alleyne D, Sennerby L, Cawley P. The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997:8:234-43 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080310.x
  30. Nedir R. Bischof M. Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. :A resonance frequency analysis study with delayed and immediately loaded ITI SLS surface. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004 ;15:520-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01059.x
  31. Balleri P, Cozzolino A, Ghelli L, Momicchioli G, Varriale A. Stability measurements of osseointegrated implants using Osstell in partially edentulous jaws after 1 year of loading: a pilot study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002:4: 128-32 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00162.x
  32. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996:7:261-7 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
  33. Buchter A, Kleinheinz J, Wiesmann HP, Kersken J, Nienkemper M, Weyhrother H. Joos U, Meyer U Biological and biomechanical evaluation of bone remodelling and implant stability after using an osteotome technique. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005: 16: 1-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01081.x
  34. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone.Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992:7:62-71