A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE CORRECTION METHODS OF NOSTRIL IN PATIENTS WITH CLEFT LIP NASAL DEFORMITY

구순열비변형 환자에서 비교정술에 대한 비교 연구

  • Ryu, Sun-Youl (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 유선열 (전남대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실, 전남대학교 치의학연구소)
  • Published : 2006.08.31

Abstract

The secondary correction of cleft lip nasal deformity (CLND) presents difficult surgical problems. Characteristically, nostrils are asymmetric. The present study was aimed to examine and compare the effect of Straith's alar web Z-plasty, Millard's alar web Z-plasty, alar web excision, and lateral V-Y advancement of the alar base for augmentation of the nostril with or without lengthening the columella in CLND. The subjects were 28 patients with unilateral cleft lip, who had secondary nostril correction. The nostril correction methods were Straith's alar web Z-plasty, Millard's alar web Z-plasty, alar web excision, and lateral V-Y advancement of the alar base. Facial photographs were taken before and 20 days after the operation. By using Adobe photoshop, the columella length and the nostril width were measured from the facial frontal photograph and Worm's eye view. The degree of improvement was calculated and statistically analyzed. The degree of improvement of the columella length using Straith's alar web Z-plasty was 70.20%. And then Millard's alar web Z-plasty was 55.01%, alar web excision was 39.93%, and lateral V-Y advancement of the alar base was 16.38% in order. The degree of improvement of the nostril size using lateral V-Y advancement of the alar base was 55.26%. And then alar web excision was 52.72%, Millard's alar web Z-plasty was 34.86%, and Straith's alar web Z-plasty was 16.06% in order. Straith's alar web Z-plasty and Millard's alar web Z-plasty resulted in elongation of the columella, equalization of asymmetrical nostril, and enlargement of small nostrils. Alar web excision enlarged nostrils and restored symmetry. Lateral VY advancement of the alar base increased nostril width and enlarged nostrils. These results indicate that the correction of nostrils improve the shape and the symmetry of the nostrils in CLND.

Keywords

References

  1. Millard DR Jr: Cleft craft. Vol I. The unilateral deformity. Boston, Little Brown, 1976;525-734
  2. Millard DR Jr: Cleft craft. Vol II. Bilateral and rare deformities. Boston, Little Brown, 1977;417-722
  3. MiIlard DR: Earlier correction of the unilateral cleft lip nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982;70:64-73 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198207000-00014
  4. Salyer KE, Bardach J: Salyer and Bardach's atlas of craniofacial and cleft surgery. Vol II. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia.New York, 1988;423-677
  5. Jacobson A: Psychological aspects of dentofacial esthetics and orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 1984;54:18-35
  6. Richman LC, Holmes CS, Eliason MJ: Adolescents with cleft lip and palate: self perceptions of appearance and behavior related to personality adjustment. Cleft Palate J 1985;22:93-99
  7. Shaw WC, Rees G, Dawe M, Charles CR: The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod 1985;87:21-26 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90170-8
  8. Howells DJ, Shaw WC: The validity and reliability of ratings of dental and facial attactiveness for epidermiological use. Am J Ortho 1985;88:402-408 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(85)90067-3
  9. Millard DR, Latham RA: Improved primary surgical and dental treatment of clefts. Plast Reconst Surg 1990;86:856-871 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199011000-00006
  10. Millard DR, Latham RA, Huifen X, Spiro S, Morovic C: Cleft lip and palate treated by presurgical orthopedics, gingivoperiosteoplasty, and lip adhesion (POPLA) compared with previous lip adhesion method: A premiliminary study of serial dental casts. Plast Reconst Surg 1999;103:1630-1644 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199905060-00009
  11. Lindsay WK, Farkas LG: The use of anthropometry in assessing the cleft-lip nose. Plast Reconst Surg 1972;49:286-292 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-197203000-00008
  12. Robert-Harry DP, Evans R, Hathorn IS: Effect of different surgical regimes on nasal asymmetry and facial attractiveness in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 1991;28:274-278 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1991)028<0274:EODSRO>2.3.CO;2
  13. Ascher-McDade C, Roberts C, Shaw WC, Gallager C: Development of a method for rating nasolabial appearance in patients with clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate-Craniofac J 1991;28:385-391 https://doi.org/10.1597/1545-1569(1991)028<0385:DOAMFR>2.3.CO;2
  14. Burke P: Serial stereophotogrammetric measurements of the soft tissues of the face. Br Dent J 1983;155:373-379 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805240
  15. Coghlan BA, Laitung KG, Pigott RW: A computer-aided method of measuring nasal symmetry in the cleft lip nose. Br J Plast Surg 1993;46:13-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(93)90058-J
  16. Cussons PD, Murison MSC, Fernandez AEL, Pigott RW: A panel based assessment of early versus no nasal correction of the cleft lip nose. Br J Plast Surg 1993;46:7-11 https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(93)90057-I
  17. Chowdri NA, Darzi MA, Ashraf MM: A comparative study of surgical results with rotation-advancement and triangular flap techniques in unilateral cleft lip. Br J Plast Surg 1990;43:551-556 https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(90)90119-K
  18. Lazarus DD, Hudson DA, van Zyl JE, Flening AN, Fernandes D: Repair of unilateral cleft lip: a comparison of five technique. Ann Plast Surg 1998;41:587-594 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199812000-00002
  19. 민병일: 일차 토순 수술후의 코입부위의 심미평가. 제1보, 입술의 비대칭성. 대한구강악안면외과학회지 1995;21:125-131
  20. 유선열, 윤천주: 편측성 완전구순열에서 Cronin 삼각피판법과 회전신전법에 의한 수복의 비교. 대한악안면성형재건외과학회지 2001;23:415-421
  21. Straith CL: Elongation of nasal columella. Plast Reconstr Surg 1946;1:79 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-194607000-00009
  22. Ortiz Monasterio F, Olmedo A: Corrective rhinoplasty before puberty: A long-term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;68:381-390 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198100000-00028