STUDY FOR HOUNSFIELD UNITS IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAM WITH JAW LESION

악골 병소의 켬퓨터 촬영상에서 Hounsfield Unit에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Chul-Hwan (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook Universiy) ;
  • Jung, Jong-Il (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Dankook Universiy)
  • 김철환 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 정종일 (단국대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Published : 2006.08.31

Abstract

The CT number is called Hounsfield unit(HU). Generally HU has a score between +1000 from -1000, and it is standardized usingthe air(-1000), water(0), and compact bone(+1000). Hounsfield Unit to standardize the density in computed tomography using the air and water has been used to analysis of lesion in other medical field. Computed tomography is popular method to analysis of lesion in oral & maxillofacial field but the analysis about density of lesion by Hounsfield unit is still obscure. For this study, computed tomography taken in Dankook University Dental Hospital and Hounsfield unit was measured to compare the difference of jaw bone lesion as cystic lesion, benign tumor, malignant tumor.

Keywords

References

  1. Mclover J: Differential diagnosis of OKC from ameloblastomas can be difficult. They sometimes show an aggressive growth or neoplastic potential and tend to recur. Br J Oral Surg 1972;10:116-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-117X(72)80027-1
  2. Van Rensburg LJ, Paquette M: Small areas of cortical crevices have been identified and described in multilocular and multilobular OKCs on CT and MRI. They are considered to be partially related to the high recurrence rate. Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America 2001;13(4):657-96
  3. Alfidi RJ, Hagga J, Meaney TF: Computed tomography of the thorax and abdomen. Radiology 1975;117:257-264 https://doi.org/10.1148/117.2.257
  4. Alfidi RJ, Macintyre WJ, Meany TF, Chernak ES, Janicki P, Tarar R, Levin H: Experimental studied to determine application of CAT scanning to human body. Radiology 1975;124:199-207
  5. MaCullough EC, Baker HL, Houser OW, Reese DF: An evaluation of quantitative and radiation features of a scanning X-ray transverse axial tomograph(EMI scanner). Radiology 1974;111,709-715 https://doi.org/10.1148/111.3.709
  6. MaCullough EC: Factors affecting the use of quantitative information from a CT scanner. Radiology 1977;124:99-107 https://doi.org/10.1148/124.1.99
  7. Metregrano VC, Patasnick J, Clark J, Chung Bin A, Weigstein R: Attenuation values in computed tomography of the abdomen. Radiology 1977;125:135-240 https://doi.org/10.1148/125.1.135
  8. Pickering RS, Hattery RR, Hatman GW, Holly KE: Computed tomography of excised kidney. Radiology 1974;113:643-647 https://doi.org/10.1148/113.3.643
  9. Wittenberg J, Matui RA, Ferruci JT, Margolis MN: Computed tomography of in vitro abdominal organs Effect of preservation of methods on attenuation coefficient. comput. Tomogra 1977;1:95-101 https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8235(77)90028-X
  10. Philips RL, Stephens DH: Computed tomography of liver specimen. Am J Roentgenology 1975;115:43-46
  11. Siegelmann SS, Zerhouni EA, Leo FP, Khouri NF, Stiitik FP: CT of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Am J Roentgenology 1980;135:1-13 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.135.1.1
  12. Kazunori Yoshiura, Yoshinori Higuchi: The long length of primordial cyst is markedly greater and the short length is similar to other cysts suggest active epithelial growth in primordial cyst. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997;83:712-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90325-5
  13. Browne RM: Keratinized epithelium might induce lobulated or multilocular patterns, because microcyst or daughter cyst formation in OKC. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 83:712-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90325-5
  14. Yokobayashi T: A clinicopathological study of non-keratinizing primordial cysts and related lesions with special reference to the existence of non-keratinizing primordial cysts. Jpn J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983;29:1090-106 (in Japanese) https://doi.org/10.5794/jjoms.29.1090
  15. Payne TF: An analysis of the clinical and histopathologic parameters of the odontogenic keratocyst. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;33:538-46 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(72)90366-0
  16. Rodu B, Tate AL, Matrinez Jr MG: The implications of inflammation in odontogenic keratocysts. J Oral Pathol 1987;16:518-21 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1987.tb00684.x
  17. Murakami S, Jikko A, Fujishita M, et al.: Clinicopathological study of odontogenic keratocyst. Oral Radiol 1990;6:27-32 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02350317
  18. Yoshiura K, Higuchi Y, Ariji Y, et al.: Increased attenuation in odontogenic keratocysts with computed tomography: a new finding. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994;23:138-42 https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.23.3.7530666
  19. Altini M, Cohen M: The follicular primordial cyst (odontogenic keratocyst). Int J Oral Surg 1982;11:175-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(82)80005-7
  20. Hartis M, Toller P: The pathogenesis of dental cysts. Br Med Bull 1975;31:159-63 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071273
  21. Vedtofte P, Holmstrup P, Dabelsteen E: Human odontogenic keratocyst transplants in nude mice. J Dent Res 1982;90:306-14
  22. Meghji S, Bando Y, Harris M: Periapical infection and the inflammatory radicular cyst. J Jpn Stomatol Soc 1994;43:172-6