Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF ALVEOLAR DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS FOR IMPLANT INSTALLATION

임플란트 식립을 위한 치조골 증강술의 임상적 분석

  • Paeng, Jun-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Myoung, Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hwang, Soon-Jung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Seo, Byoung-Moo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Ho (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choung, Pill-Hoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Myung-Jin (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 팽준영 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 명훈 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 황순정 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 서병무 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 최진영 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 이종호 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 정필훈 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 김명진 (서울대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실)
  • Published : 2006.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: Distraction osteogenesis has recently evolved a challenging technique to overcome the limitations of conventional augmentation procedures. The aim of this report was to evaluate the clinical result of alveolar distraction osteogenesis for implant installation. Methods: Twenty five patients with alveolar ridge deficiencies were treated with vertical alveolar distraction osteogenesis by intraoral device (total 27 devices: 25 extraosseous and 2 intraosseous devices). After the latency periods of 5-7 days, activation of the device was started. The distraction rhythm and rate was 0.75-1.0 mm a day with 2 or 3 times a day. After 3-4 months, dental implants were placed with removing the distractor simultaneously. Results: On average, a vertical gain of $9.8{\pm}3.4\;mm$ was obtained by distraction osteogenesis. Total 84 implants were installed. Average follow up period was $13.5{\pm}7.5$ months. No implant was removed during the follow up period. Three patients showed infection during the distraction osteogenesis. Three devices were broken and 2 devices among them were replaced with new one. Conclusion: Relatively larger amount of alveolar bone augmentation could be obtained with distraction osteogenesis. For the ideal anatomically and functionally ideal regeneration of alveolar bone to install dental implant, the complication of distraction should be controlled.

Keywords

References

  1. Ilizarov GA : The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 263, 1989
  2. Ilizarov GA : The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues. Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 249, 1989
  3. McCarthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N et al : Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg 89 : 1, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199289010-00001
  4. Block MS, Chang A, Crawford C : Mandibular alveolar ridge augmentation in the dog using distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54 : 309, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90750-8
  5. Chin M, Toth BA : Distraction osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery using internal devices: review of five cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 54 : 45, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90303-1
  6. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Karcher H : Distraction implants: a new operative technique for alveolar ridge augmentation. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 27 : 214, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(99)80032-8
  7. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Karcher H : Vertical alveolar ridge distraction with prosthetic treatable distractors: a clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15 : 701, 2000
  8. Chiapasco M, Romeo E, Casentini P et al : Alveolar distraction osteogenesis vs. vertical guided bone regeneration for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a 1-3-year prospective study on humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 15 : 82, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00982.x
  9. McAllister BS, Gaffaney TE : Distraction osteogenesis for vertical bone augmentation prior to oral implant reconstruction. Periodontol 2000 33 : 54, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2002.03305.x
  10. Urbani G : Alveolar distraction before implantation: a report of five cases and a review of the literature. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 21 : 569, 2001
  11. Robiony M, Polini F, Costa F et al : Osteogenesis distraction and platelet-rich plasma for bone restoration of the severely atrophic mandible: preliminary results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60 : 630, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.33107
  12. Jensen OT, Cockrell R, Kuhike L et al : Anterior maxillary alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a prospective 5-year clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17 : 52, 2002
  13. Zaffe D, Bertoldi C, Palumbo C et al : Morphofunctional and clinical study on mandibular alveolar distraction osteogenesis. Clin Oral Implants Res 13 : 550, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130516.x
  14. Papageorge MB: Distraction osteogenesis for augmentation of the deficient alveolar ridge. J Mass Dent Soc 51 : 24, 2002
  15. Gaggl A, Schultes G, Rainer H et al : The transgingival approach for placement of distraction implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60 : 793, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.33248
  16. Uckan S, Haydar SG, Dolanmaz D : Alveolar distraction: analysis of 10 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 94 : 561, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2002.128023
  17. Garcia-Garcia A, Somoza-Martin M, Gandara-Vila P et al : Alveolar distraction before insertion of dental implants in the posterior mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41 : 376, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-4356(03)00171-2
  18. Kunkel M, Wahlmann U, Reichert TE et al : Reconstruction of mandibular defects following tumor ablation by vertical distraction osteogenesis using intraosseous distraction devices. Clin Oral Implants Res 16 : 89, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01073.x
  19. Polo WC, Cury PR, Sendyk WR et al : Posterior mandibular alveolar distraction osteogenesis utilizing an extraosseous distractor: a prospective study. J Periodontol 76 : 1463, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.9.1463
  20. Enislidis G, Fock N, Millesi-Schobel G et al : Analysis of complications following alveolar distraction osteogenesis and implant placement in the partially edentulous mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 100 : 25, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.11.021
  21. Burchardt H : The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 28, 1983
  22. Ray RD : Vascularization of bone grafts and implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 87 : 43, 1972
  23. Troulis MJ, Glowacki J, Perrott DH et al : Effects of latency and rate on bone formation in a porcine mandibular distraction model. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 58 : 507, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(00)90012-0
  24. Farhadieh RD, Gianoutsos MP, Dickinson R et al : Effect of distraction rate on biomechanical, mineralization, and histologic properties of an ovine mandible model. Plast Reconstr Surg 105 : 889, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200003000-00010
  25. Nosaka Y, Kitano S, Wada K et al : Endosseous implants in horizontal alveolar ridge distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17 : 846, 2002
  26. Perry M, Hodges N, Hallmon DW et al : Distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous onlay grafting. Part I: outcome of implant integration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20 : 695, 2005