Effect of Empirical Smoking Prevention Program for Female High School Students

인문계 여고생을 대상으로 한 체험적 흡연예방프로그램의 효과

  • Published : 2006.06.01

Abstract

Purpose : This was aimed to investigate the effects of empirical smoking prevention program on the knowledge of the harmfulness of smoking, attitude to smoking, smoking temptation among female high school students. Methods : This study used nonequivalent control group pre and post test design. The subjects were recruited from the first and second grade at the two girls' high schools located in Ulsan city, and randomly assigned to two groups(113 in the experimental group and 117 in the control). The intervention was both the events such as nonsmoking promulgation and experiential learning programs and student-oriented educational sessions(once a week for six weeks). Data was analyzed with X2 test, t-test and ANCOVA. Results : The mean knowledge was 12.5 for pretest and 13.7 for posttest in the experimental group, and 12.7 and 13.4 in the control group, retrospectively. The mean attitude was 71.0 for pretest and 72.2 for posttest in the experimental group, and 72.3 and 72.6 in the control group, retrospectively. The mean temptation was 15.0 for pretest and 14.7 for posttest in the experimental group, and 13.9 and 14.0 in the control group, retrospectively. There's no difference in the change of the knowledge of the harmfulness of smoking, attitude to smoking, smoking temptation between experimental and control groups. Conclusion : As the possible reasons, the subjects already had sufficient knowledge on the harmfulness of smoking, the research questionnaires were too plain to get any difference, the effect of intervention was too small to show a difference in such as short-term, and finally, there were many external factors. Hence, we recommend further studies with appropriate questionnaire for longer time.

Keywords

References

  1. 강혜영, 박인혜, 류현숙 (2001). 흡연예방프로그램이 중학교 1학년 학생의 흡연에 대한 지식, 태도 그리고 자아존중감과 스트레스에 미치는 효과. 한국학교보건학회지, 8(14), 96-106
  2. 김수진 (1999). 범이론적 모델을 적용한 금연프로그램이 고등학생의 흡연행위와 사회심리적 변인에 미치는 효과. 가톨릭대학교 박사학위논문, 서울
  3. 김소야자, 권인순 (2000). 인터넷 탐색과 비디오 시청에 따른 고등학생의 금연교육효과. 간호학탐구, 91(1), 118-143
  4. 김택민 (1999). 고교생들의 금연교육 효과 분석. 한국역학회지, 14(2), 175-183
  5. 김현실 (2001), 청소년기의 가정역동적 환경, 성격, 및 흡연이 비행행동에 미치는 영향. 대한간호학회지, 31(4), 641-655
  6. 노정리 (1996). 남자고등학생의 사회적 영향을 강조한 흡연예방 프로그램 효과. 연세대학교 석사학위논문, 서울
  7. 박남희 (2002). 범이론적 모형( Transtheoretical Model) 을 이용한 청소년의 금연변화단계 예측요인. 부산대학교 박사학위논문, 부산
  8. 박영규, 강윤주 (1996). 학동기 아동의 흡연행동 및 흡연에 대한 지식, 태도 조사. 가정의학회지, 17(9), 798-809
  9. 백경옥 (2001) . 중학생의 흡연에 대한 지식과 태도. 부산대학교 석사학위논문, 부산
  10. 신성례, 하나선 ( 2001). 청소년 흡연 예방을 위한 자기 주장 훈련 비디오 개발과 효과검증 연구. 대한간호학회지, 32(3), 336-343
  11. 신영숙, 현은민 (2000). 초등학생 흡연예방 교육프로그램의 개발. 한국가정관리학회지, 18(4), 75-94
  12. 야후 국어사전. Available at http://kr.dic.yahoo.com/search/kor/search.html
  13. 이은혜, 양은영, 김일옥 (2001). 초등학교의 흡연예방 교육의 실태. 간호과학, 13(2), 51-58
  14. 임소연 (1996). 금연교육프로그램이 흡연행동 변화에 미치는 효과. 제주대학교 석사학위논문, 제주
  15. 정인숙 (2002). 하남시 청소년 흡연 실태. 하남시 보건소, 하남
  16. 차명호 (2000). 청소년들 스트레스해소를 위해 담배피워 - 충렬고등학교의 사례를 중심으로. 건강생활
  17. 한국금연운동협의회. 우리나라 청소년 홉연실태 일람표 (2005년까지). Available at http://www.kash.or.kr/user/main.asp
  18. 한선희 (1999). 중학생의 약물남용 태도 및 행동과 관련요인에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 석사학위논문, 서울
  19. Bertrand. L. D., & Abernathy, T. J. (1993). Predicting cigarette smoking among adolescents using cross-sectional and longitudinal approaches. J Sch Health, 63(2), 98-103 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1993.tb06088.x
  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(1997). Projected smoking related deaths among youth-United States. MMWR, 45, 971-974
  21. Connell, D. B.. Turner. R. R., & Mason. E. F. (1985). Summary of findings of the school health education evaluation: Health promotion effectiveness. implementation. and costs. J Sch Health, 5(8), 316-321
  22. Flay, B. R., Koepke, D., Thomson, S. J., Santi, S., Best, J. A., Brown, K. S. (1989). Six-year follow-up of the first Waterloo school smoking prevention trial. Am J Public Health, 79(10), 1371-1376 https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.79.10.1371
  23. Nutbeam, D. (1995). Exposing the myth. What schools can and cannot do to prevent tobacco use by young people. Promot Educ, 2(1), 11-14 https://doi.org/10.1177/102538239500200107
  24. Pederson, L. L. (1982). Compliance with physician advice to quit smoking: a review of the literature. Prev Med, 11(1), 71-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(82)90006-8
  25. Pentz, M. A., MacKinnon, D. P., Dwyer, J. H., Wang, E. Y., Hansen, W. B., Flay, B. R., Johnson, C. A. (1989). Longitudinal Effects of the Midwestern Prevention Project on Regular and Experimental Smoking in Adolescents. Prev Med, 18(2), 304-321 https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(89)90077-7
  26. Plummer, B. A., Velicer, W. F., Redding, C. A., Prochaska, J. O., Rossi, J. S. Pallonen, U. E., Meier, K. S. (2001). Stage of change, decisional balance, and temptations for smoking Measurement and validation in large, school-based population of adolescents. Addict Behav, 26, 551-571 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00144-1
  27. Price, J. H., Beach, P., Everett, S., Telljohann, S. K., Lewis, L. (1998). Evaluation of a three-year urban elementary school tobacco prevention program. J Sch Health, 68(1), 26-31 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.1998.tb03483.x
  28. Velicer, W. F., DiClemente, C. C., Rossi, J. S., Prochaska, J. O. (1990). Relapse situations and self-efficacy: an integrative model. Addict Behav, 15(3), 271-283 https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4603(90)90070-E