Ductility Capacity of Shear-Dominated Steel Plate Walls

전단지배 강판벽의 연성능력

  • 박홍근 (서울대학교 건축학과) ;
  • 최인락 (서울대학교 건축학과) ;
  • 전상우 (포항산업과학연구원 강구조연구소) ;
  • 김원기 (호서대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2006.04.12
  • Accepted : 2006.07.12
  • Published : 2006.08.27

Abstract

An experimental study was performed to investigate the maximum energy dissipation and the ductility capacity of shear-dominated steel plate walls with thin web plates. Three specimens of three-story plate walls with thin web plates were tested. The parameters for the test specimens were the aspect ratio of the web plate and the shear strength of the column. A concentrically braced frame and a moment-resisting frme were a also tested for comparison. The steel plate walls exhibited much better ductility and energy dissipation capacity than the concentrically braced frame and the moment-resisting frame. The results showed that unlike other structural systems, the sh as well as strength, and can therefore be used as an effective earthquake-resisting system. A method of predicting the energy dissipation capacity of a steel plate wall was proposed.

얇은 웨브강판을 사용한 전단지배 강판벽의 최대 에너지소산능력 및 연성능력을 연 구하기 위한 실험 연구를 실시하였다. 이를위해서 얇은 강판을 사용한 3층 골조 강판벽 실험을 수행하였다. 주요 실험 변수는 강판의 형상비와 기둥 단면의 전단강도이며, 골조 강판벽 시스템의 상대적 비교를 위해 중심가새골조 및 모멘트저항골조와의 비교실험을 실시하였다. 골조 강판벽 실험체는 중심가새골조와 모멘트저항골조 실험체에 비하여 매우 우수한 연성도와 에너지소산능력을 나타냈다. 따라서 전단지배형 골조강판벽은 큰 강도, 강성 및 변형능력을 동시에 달성할 수 있는 이상적인 내진구조시스템으로 사용할 수 있다. 전단지배 강판벽의 주기거동을 예측하기 위하여, 본 연구의 실험결과와 기존 실험결과를 토대로 강판벽의 에너지소산능력을 예측할 수 있는 방법을 제시하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. 대한건축학회 (2005). 건설교통부 고시 건축구조설계기준 (Korean Building Code-Structural), 대한건축학회
  2. 박홍근, 곽재혁, 전상우, 김원기. (2004). '주기하중을 받는 골 조강판벽의 실험연구' 강구조학회 논문집 16(6)(통권73호)
  3. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (1999). Load and resistance factor design specification, Chicago
  4. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). (2005). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, Chicago
  5. Behbahanifard, M.R. (2003). 'Cyclic behavior of unstiffened steel plate shear walls.' PhD Dissertation, Dept. of Civil Engineerig, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  6. Blodgett, O. (1995). 'Structural details to increase ductility of connections.' Steel TIPS Report, Structural Steel Educational Council, Moraga, Calif
  7. Caccese, V., Elgaaly, M., and Chen, R. (1993). 'Experimental study of thin steel-plate shear walls under cyclic load.' J. Struct. Eng., 119(2), 573-587 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1993)119:2(573)
  8. Canadian Standards Association (CSA). (2001). Limit states design of steel structures, CAN/CSA S16-01, Canadian Standards Association, Willowdale, Ont., Canada
  9. Driver, R. G., Kulak, G. L., Kennedy, D. J. L., and Elwi, A. E. (1997). 'Seismic behavior of steel plate shear walls.' Structural Engineering Rep. No. 215, Dept. of Civil Engineerig, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
  10. Driver, R. G., Kulak, G. L., Kennedy, D. J. L., and Elwi, A. E. (1998). 'Cyclic test of a four-storey steel plate shear wall.' J. Struct. Eng., 124(2), 111-120 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:2(111)
  11. Elgaaly, M. (1998). 'Thin steel plate shear walls behavior and analysis.' Thin-Walled Struct., 32, 151-180 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8231(98)00031-7
  12. Englekirk, R. (1994). Steel structures: Controlling behavior through design, Wiley, New York
  13. Hibbitt, Karlsson, and Sorenson Inc. (HKS). (2003). ABAQUS standard, Version 6.4, HKS, Pawtucket, RI
  14. Lubell, A. S., Prion, H. G. L., Ventura, C. E., and Rezai, M. (2000). 'Unstiffened steel plate shear wall performance under cyclic loading.' J. Struct. Eng. 126(4), 453-460 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:4(453)
  15. Zhao, Q., and Astaneh-Asl, A. (2004). 'Cyclic behavior of an innovative steel shear wall system.' Proc., 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, Paper #2576