DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Modification of conventional X-ray diffractometer for the measurement of phase distribution in a narrow region

  • Received : 2006.08.29
  • Accepted : 2006.09.22
  • Published : 2006.10.28

Abstract

An X-ray diffractometer for spatially resolved X-ray diffraction measurements was developed to identify phase in the narrow (micron-scaled) region of high burn-up fuels and some nuclear materials. The micro-XRD was composed of an X-ray microbeam alignment system and a sample micro translation system instead of a normal slit and a fixed sample stage in a commercial XRD. The X-ray microbeam alignment system was fabricated with a microbeam concentrator having two Ni deposited mirrors, a vertical positioner, and a tilt table for the generation of a concentrated microbeam. The sample micro translation system was made with a sample holder and a horizontal translator, allowing movement of a specimen at $5{\mu}m$ steps. The angular intensity profile of the microbeam generated through a concentrator was symmetric and not distorted. The size of the microbeam was $4,000{\times}20{\mu}m$ and the spatial resolution of the beam was $47{\mu}m$ at the sample position. When the diffraction peaks were measured for a $UO_2$ pellet specimen by this system, the reproducibility ($2{\Theta}={\pm}0.01^{\circ}$) of the peaks was as good as a conventional X-ray diffractometer. For the cross section of oxidized titanium metal, not only $TiO_2$ in an outer layer but also TiO near an oxide-metal interface was observed.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Spino and D. Papaioannou, Journal of Nuclear Materials, 281, 146-162 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00236-1
  2. D. Papaioannou and J. Spino, Review of Scientific Instruments, 73, 2659-2665 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1425777
  3. D. H. Bilderback and D. J. Thiel, Review of Scientific Instruments, 66, 2059-2063 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1145727
  4. Y. Suzuki and F. Uchida, Review of Scientific Instruments, 63, 578-581 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1142710
  5. M. R. Howells, D. Cambie, R.M. Duarte, S. Irick, A.A. MacDowell, Opt. Eng. 39, 2748-2762 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1289879
  6. A. Takeuchi, Y. Suzuki, K. Uesugi, and S. Aoki, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 467- 468, 302-304 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00308-4
  7. S. Hayakawa, A. Iida, S. Aoki, and Y. Gohshi, Review of Scientific Instruments, 60, 2452-2455 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1140696
  8. H. N. Chapman, K. A. Nugent, and S. W. Wilkins, Applied Optics, 32, 6316-6332 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.32.006316
  9. H. N. Chapman, A. Rode, K. A. Nugent, and S. W. Wilkins, Applied Optics, 32, 6333-6340 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.32.006333
  10. P. Dhez, P. Chevallier, T. B. Lucatorto, and C. Tarrio, Review of Scientific Instruments, 70, 1907-1920 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1149733
  11. A. Snigirev, Review of Scientific Instruments, 66, 2053- 2058 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1145726
  12. C. David and A. Souvorov, Review of Scientific Instruments, 70, 4168-4173 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1149702
  13. A. Snigirev, V. Kohn, I. Snigireva, and B. Lengeler, Nature, 364, 49-51 (1996)
  14. Y. S. Park, Y. K. Ha, S. D. Park, S. H. Han, and W. H. Kim, 'X-ray microbeam generation with optical mirrors and lens', KAERI/AR-706/2004, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, 2004