Journal of Animal Science and Technology

Korean Society of Animal Sciences and Technology (한국축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Estimation of Variance Component and Environment Effects on Somatic Cell Scores by Parity in Dairy Cattle

젖소집단의 산차에 따른 체세포점수의 환경효과 및 분산성분 추정

  • Published : 2006.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study utilized test day of somatic cell score data of dairy cattle from 2000 to 2004. The number of data used were 124,635 of first parity, 134,308 of second parity, 77,862 of third parity, 41,787 of forth parity and 37,412 of fifth parity. The data was analyzed by least square mean method using GLM to estimate the effects of calving year, age, lactation stage, parity and season on somatic cell score. Variance component estimation using test day model was determined by using expectation maximization algorithm- restricted maximum likelihood (EM-REML) analysis method. In each parity, somatic cell score was low for younger group and was relatively high in older groups. Likewise, for lactation stage, the score was low in early-lactation and high in late-lactation in first parity and second parity. Nevertheless, for the third, fourth and fifth parity, however, high somatic cell score was observed in mid-lactation. Generally, the score was high in the peak. Although in fourth and fifth parity, the score was low in late-lactation. Environmental effect of season, somatic cell score was generally low from September to November for all parities. The score was high between June and August when the milk production is usually low. The heritability in each parity were 0.05, 0.09, 0.10, 0.05 and 0.05 for parity 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, respectively. Genetic variance value was estimated to be high in second, third and fifth parity in early-lactation and to be low in first and forth parity.

본 연구는 1999년 1월부터 2004년 12월까지의 체세포점수의 검정일 자료를 이용하여 124,635개의 초산자료와 134,308개의 2산자료, 37,412개의 3산자료, 41787개의 4산자료, 37412개의 5산 자료를 이용하였다. 분석에 사용된 방법은 체세포 점수에 영향을 미치는 분만연도, 연령, 비유단계, 산차, 계절의 효과를 추정하기 위하여 GLM을 이용하여 최소자승법으로 분석하였으며, 검정일 모형을 이용한 분산성분 추정은 EM-REML 분석방법을 전산 프로그램한 REMLF90을 이용하였다. 각 산차별로 연령에 대한 효과는 연령이 낮은 군에서 체세포 점수가 낮게 나타났으며, 연령이 높은 군에서는 다소 높게 나타났다. 비유단계별 효과는 1산과 2산에서는 비유초기에서 체세포 점수가 낮게 나타났으며 비유말기에 3.151, 3.696로 높은 체세포 점수를 나타났으나, 3산, 4산, 5산에서는 비유중기에 높은 체세포 점수를 나타내었으며, 대체로 피크기에 체세포 점수가 높게 나타나는데 4산과 5산에서는 비유말기에 체세포 점수가 낮게 나타났다. 분만계절별 환경효과는 1산～5산 모두 대체로 9～11월에 체세포 점수가 낮게 나타났으며, 대체로 유량이 낮게 추정되는 6～8월 사이에는 체세포 점수가 대체로 높게 나타났다. 각 산차별 유전력은 1산에서 5산까지 각각 0.05, 0.09, 0.10, 0.05, 0.05를 나타냈으며, 유전분산값은 비유초기의 경우 2, 3, 5산에서 높게 나타났으며, 1산과 4산의 경우는 대체로 낮게 추정되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ali, A. K. A. and Shook, G. E. 1980. An optimum transformation for somatic cell concentration in milk. J. Dairy Sci. 63:487-490 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82959-6
  2. Carlen, E., Strandberg, E. and Roth. A. 2004. Genetic parameters for clinical mastitis, somatic cell score, and production in the first three lactations of Swedish holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87(9):3062-3070 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73439-6
  3. Emanuelson, U., Danell, B. and Philipson, J. 1988. Genetic paameters fo clinical mastitis, somatic cell counts, and milk production estimated by multiple trait restricted maximum likelihood. J. Dairy Sci. 71:467 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79576-4
  4. Gengler, N., Tijani, A., Wiggans, G. R., Van Tassel, C. P. and Pilpot, J. C. 1999. Estimation of (co)variances od lactation yields for first lactation Holsteins in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 82:225
  5. Haile-Mariam, M., Bowman, P. J. and Goddard, M. E. 2001. Genetic and environmental correlations between test-day somatic cell count milk yield traits. Livest. Prod. Sci. 73, 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00232-9
  6. Haile-Mariam, M., Goddard, M. E. and Bowman, P. J. 2001. Estimates of genetic parameters for daily somatic cell count of Australian dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1255-1264 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74587-0
  7. Heringstad, B., Klemetsdal, G. and Ruane, J. 2000. Selection for mastitis resistance in dairy cattle - a review with focus on the situation in the Nordic countries. Livest. Prod. Sci. 64:95-106 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(99)00128-1
  8. Jamrozik, J., Jansen, G., Schaeffer, L. R. and Liu, Z. 1998. Analysis of persistency of lactation calculated from a Random Regression Test-day model. Interbull Bull. 16:43-47
  9. Jensen, J. 2001. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle using test-day model. J. Dairy Sci. 84:2803-2812 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74736-4
  10. Liu, Z., Reinhardt, F. and Reents, R. 2000b Parameter estimations of a random regression test day model for first three lactation somatic sell scores. Interbull Bulletin 26:61-66
  11. Liu, Z., Reinhardt, A., Bunger, L., Dopp, and Reents, R. 2003. Application of a Random Regression Model to Genetic Evaluations of Test Day Yields and Somatic Cell Scores in Dairy Cattle. Interbull Bulletin 30:159-166
  12. Lund, M. S., Jensen, J. and Petesen, P. H., 1999. Estimation of genetic and phenotypic parameters of clinical mastitis, somatic cell production deviance, and protein yield in dairy cattle using Gibbs sampling. J. Dairy Sci. 82:1045-1051 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75325-7
  13. Meyer, K., Graser, H.-U. and Hammond, K. 1989. Estimates of genetic parameters for first lactation Test-day production of Austalian Black and White cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 21:177-199 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(89)90049-3
  14. Miller, R. H., Paape, M. J. and Fulton, L. A. 1991. Variation in milk somatic cells of heifers at first calving. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3782-3790 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78570-6
  15. Minna Koivula, Enyew Neguissie, Esa A. Mantysaari, 2004. Genetic parameters for testday somatic cell count at different lactation stages of Finnish dairy cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 90:145-157 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.03.004
  16. Misztal, I. 2001. BLUPPF90 family pakage
  17. Mrode, R. A. and Swanson, G. J. T. 2003. Estimation of genetic parameters for somatic cell count in the first three lactation using random regression. Livest. Prod. Sci. 79, 239-247 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00169-0
  18. Mrode, R. A. and Swanson, G. J. T. 1996. Genetic and statistical properties of somatic cell count and its suitability as an indirect means of reducing the incidence of mastitis in dairy cattle. Animal breeding abstracts vol 64 No. 11. 847-857
  19. Mrode, R. A. and Swanson, G. J. T. and Winters, M. S. 1998. Genetic parameters and evaluations for somatic cell counts and its relationship with production and type traits in some dairy breeds in the UK. Anim. Sci. 66:569-576 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800009140
  20. Powell, R. L., Vanraden, P. M. and Wiggans, G. R. 1997. Relationship between united states and Canadian genetic evaluations of longevity and somatics cell score. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1807-1812 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76115-0
  21. Raubertas, R. F. and Shook, G. E. 1982. Relationship between lactation measures of somatic cell concentration and milk yield. J. Dairy Sci. 65:419-425 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82207-8
  22. Reents, R,. Jamrozik, J., Schaeffer, L. R. and Dekkers, J. C. M. 1995. Estimation of genetic parameters for test day records of somatic cell score. J. Dairy Sci. 78:2847-2857 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76915-6
  23. Sandra, L., Rodriguez-Zas., Daniel, Gianola., and George, E. Shook. 2000. Evaluation of models for somatic cell score lactation patterns in Holstein. Livest. Prod. Sci. 67, 19-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00193-7
  24. SAS(R) User's Guide: Statistics, Version 6.0 Edition 1990. SAS Inst., Cary, NC
  25. Schaeffer, L. R., Gamrozik, J., Kistemaker, G. J. and Van Doormaal, B. J. 2000. Experience with a Test-day model. J. Dairy Sci. 83:1135-1144 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74979-4
  26. Shook, G. E. and Schutz, M. M. 1994. Selection on somatic cell score improve resistance to mastitis in the united states. J. Dairy Sci. 77:648-658 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)76995-2
  27. Schutz, M. M., Hansen, L. B., Steuenagel, G. R., Reneau, J. K. and Kuck, A. L. 1990. Genetic parameters for somatic cells, protein, and fat in milk of Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 73:494 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(90)78697-3
  28. Swalve, H. H. 2000. Theoretical basis and computational methods for dierent testday genetic evaluation methods. J. Dairy Sci. 83:1115-1124 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74977-0
  29. Swalve, H. H. 1995. The effect of Test-day models on the estimation od genetic parameters and breeding values for dairy yield traits. J. Dairy Sci. 78:929-938 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76708-X
  30. Wilmink, J. B. M., 1987. Adjustment of Test-day milk, fat, and protein yield for age, season and stage of lactation. Livest. Prod. Sci.16, 335-348 https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(87)90003-0
  31. 김낙환, 정종현, 김시동, 최유림, 이일주, 한광진, 박영일. 2001. 젖소의 체세포 지수와 생산형질에 대한 환경효과와 유전모수 추정. 한국동물자원과학회지 : 43(4) 423-430
  32. 김병우. 2004. 임의회귀 모형을 이용한 젖소 산유형질의 유전모수 추정. 서울대학교. 박사학위
  33. 이득환, 조주현, 한광진. 2003. 임의회귀 검정일 모형을 이용한 홀스타인 젖소의 1산 차 산유형질 및 체세포 지수에 대한 유전 모수. 한국동물자원과학회지 45(5):739-748