Environmental Engineering Research

Korean Society of Environmental Engineers (대한환경공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

THE EFFECT OF AIR BUBBLES FROM DISSOLVED GASES ON THE MEMBRANE FOULING IN THE HOLLOW FIBER SUBMERGED MEMBRANE BIO-REACTOR (SMBR)

  • Jang, Nam-Jung (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science & Technology (GIST)) ;
  • Yeo, Young-Hyun (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science & Technology (GIST)) ;
  • Hwang, Moon-Hyun (Gwangyang Environmental Research Dept., Research Institute of Industrial Scrence & Technology (RIST)) ;
  • Vigneswaran, Saravanamuthu (Environmental Engineering Group, University of Technology Sydney (UTS)) ;
  • Cho, Jae-Weon (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science & Technology (GIST)) ;
  • Kim, In S. (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Gwangju Institute of Science & Technology (GIST))
  • Published : 2006.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

There is a possibility of the production of the air bubbles in membrane pores due to the reduction in pressure during membrane filtration. The effect of fine air bubbles from dissolved gases on microfiltration was investigated in the submerged membrane bio-reactor (SMBR). The $R_{air}$ (air bubble resistance) was defined as the filtration resistance due to the air bubbles formed from the gasification of dissolved gases. From the results of filtration tests using pure water with changes in the dissolved oxygen concentration, the air bubbles from dissolved gases were confirmed to act as a foulant and; thus, increase the filtration resistance. The standard pore blocking and cake filtration models, SPBM and CFM, respectively, were applied to investigate the mechanism of air bubble fouling on a hollow fiber membrane. However, the application of the SPBM and CFM were limited in explaining the mechanism due to the properties of air bubble. With a simple comparison of the different filtration resistances, the $R_{air}$ portion was below 1% of the total filtration resistance during sludge filtration. Therefore, the air bubbles from dissolved gases would only be a minor foulant in the SMBR. However, under the conditions of a high gasification rate from dissolved gases, the effect of air bubble fouling should be considered in microfiltration.

Keywords

References

  1. Gander, M., Jefferson, B., and Judd, S., 'Aerobic MBRs for domestic wastewater treatment: a review with cost considerations,' Separation and Purification Technology, 18, 119-130 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5866(99)00056-8
  2. Stephenson, T., Judd, S., Jefferson, B., and Brindle, K., Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment, IWA publishing, London, (2000)
  3. Jang, N. J., Hwang, M. H., Yeo, Y. H., Shim, W. G., Vigneswaran, S., and Kim, I. S., 'The kinetics on the biological reaction in membrane bioreactor (MBR) with gravitational and transversal filtration,' Environ. Eng. Res., 9(5), 238-247 (2004) https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2004.9.5.238
  4. Yamamoto, K., Hiasa, M., Mahmood, T., and Matsuo, T., 'Direct solid-liquid separation using hollow fiber membrane in an activated sludge aeration tank,' Wat. Sci. Tech., 21, 43-54 (1989)
  5. Chang, I. S., Le, Clech. P., Jefferson, B., and Judd, S., 'Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment,' J. Environmental Engineering, 128, 1018-1029 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2002)128:11(1018)
  6. Yoon, T. I., Lee, H. S., and Kim, C. G., 'Comparison of pilot scale performances between membrane bioreactor and hybrid conventional wastewater treatment systems,' J. Membrane Sci., 242, 5-12 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.02.040
  7. Ionics Worldwide Headquarters, 'Alaskan lodge uses a membrane bioreactor (MBR) system to meet its wastewater treatment needs,' Filtration & Separation, 41, 20-22 (2004)
  8. Wen, X., Ding, H., Huang, X., and Liu, R., 'Treatment of hospital wastewater using a submerged membrane bioreactor,' Process Biochemistry, 39, 1427-1431 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-9592(03)00277-2
  9. Lee, W., Kang, S., and Shin, H., 'Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors,' J. Membrane Sci., 216, 217-227 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00073-5
  10. Bouhabila, E. H., Aim, R. B., and Buisson, H., 'Microfiltration of activated sludge using submerged membrane with air bubbling (application to wastewater treatment),' Desalination, 118, 315-322 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(98)00156-8
  11. Hong, S. P., Bae, T. H., Tak, T. M., Hong. S., and Randall, A., 'Fouling control in activated sludge submerged hollow fiber membrane bi oreactors,' Desalination, 143, 219-228 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(02)00260-6
  12. Ueda, T., Hata, K., Kikuoka, Y., and Seino, O., 'Effect of aeration on suction pressure in a submerged membrane bioreactor,' Wat. Res., 31, 489-494 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00292-8
  13. Hermia, J., 'Constant pressure blocking filtration law application to power-law non-Newtonian fluid,' Trans. Inst. Chem. Eng., 60, 183-187 (1982)
  14. Kim, S. H., Application of adsorption and membrane-adsorption hybrid system in water and wastewater treatment, PhD thesis, Dep. of Chem. Tech., Chonnam National University (2002)
  15. Field, R. W., Wu, D., Howell, J. A., and Gupta, B. B., 'Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling,' J. Membrane Sci., 100, 259-272 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(94)00265-Z
  16. Metsamuuronen, S., Howell, J., and Nystom, M., 'Critical flux in ultrafiltration of myoglobin and baker's yeast,' J. Membrane Sci., 196, 13-25 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(01)00572-5

Cited by

  1. Analysis of Total Bacteria, Enteric Members of γ-proteobacteria and Microbial Communities in Seawater as Indirect Indicators for Quantifying Biofouling vol.14, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2009.14.1.019
  2. Selection of the most problematic biofoulant in fouled RO membrane and the seawater intake to develop biosensors for membrane biofouling vol.247, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.12.018
  3. Multiple hybridizations using quantum dot-DNA probes for rapid analysis of microbial community on reverse osmosis membrane vol.247, pp.1, 2006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.12.032
  4. 자철광 분말을 이용한 하수처리시스템의 질소, 인 제거효율에 관한 연구 vol.18, pp.2, 2006, https://doi.org/10.5293/kfma.2015.18.2.043
  5. A Study on Membrane Fouling Control by Immobilized Microbial Media for Nitrification in Membrane Bioreactor vol.41, pp.5, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2019.41.5.272
  6. Effect of Oxidant Addition on Water Quality and Microfiltration Performance during Water Reclamation vol.42, pp.4, 2006, https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2020.42.4.210
  7. State-of-the-Art and Opportunities for Forward Osmosis in Sewage Concentration and Wastewater Treatment vol.11, pp.5, 2006, https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11050305