Relationship of occlusion and gingival recession

교합과 치은 퇴축과의 관계

  • Seok, Jeong-Jin (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Jeong, Dong-Keun (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kwon, Jin-Hee (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Park, So-Young (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Ko, Sun-Young (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyung-Seop (Department of Periodontology, and Research Institute of Oral Bio-Science, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 석정진 (전북대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 정동근 (전북대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 권진희 (전북대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 박소영 (전북대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 고선영 (전북대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실) ;
  • 김형섭 (전북대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 전북대학교 구강생체과학 연구소)
  • Published : 2006.03.30

Abstract

Many factors have been implicated in the etiology of gingival recession, including faulty toothbrushing, the position of the tooth in the arch(malalignment), the presence of inflammation, frenal attachment, impingement of restoration margins, orthodontic treatment and trauma from occlusion. Among the many factors, this study was to evaluate the relationship of occlusion and gingival recession. 640 teeth without other etiologic factors of gingival recession were evaluated in 40 subjects aged 21-59 years. Only 1st, 2nd premolar and molar were included in this study. We recorded nonworking contacts, working contacts, cervical abrasion, sex, gingival recession and evaluated that relation of occlusion and gingival recession. The results of this study were as follows; 1. Teeth with nonworking contacts were significantly more gingival recession than teeth without nonworking contacts.(p<0.01) 2. Teeth with working contacts were significantly more gingival recession than teeth without working contacts.(p<0.01) 3. Teeth with cervical lesion were significantly more gingival recession than teeth without cervical lesion.(p<0.01) 4. Men's teeth were more gingival recession than women's teeth but it was not significant.(p>0.01)

Keywords

References

  1. Baker D.L. and Seymour G.J. The possible pathogenesis of gingival recession. J Clin Periodontol 1976:3,208-219 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1976.tb00040.x
  2. Pihlstrom BL., Anderson K., Dorothy, M E, Schaffer. Association between signs of trauma from occlusion and periodontitis. J Periodontol 2001;57,1-6
  3. Burgett FG, Ramfjord SP. A randomized trial of occlusal adjustment in the treatment of periodontitis patients. J Clin Periodontol. 1992;19:381-387 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1992.tb00666.x
  4. Woda A, Vigneron P. Nonfunctional and functional occlusal contacts. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:335 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90226-9
  5. Gary Robert Goldstein. Relationship of canine-protected occlusion to a periodontal index. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:277-283 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90007-6
  6. Steiner G.G., J.K. Pearson, J. Ainamo. Changes of the marginal periodontium as a result of labial tooth movement in monkeys. J Periodontol 56,314-320
  7. Glickman I, Smulow JB. Alterations in the pathway of gingival inflammation into the underlying tissues induced by excessive occlusal forces. J Periodontol 1962;33:7-13
  8. Glickman I, Smulow JB. Effect of excessive occlusal forces upon the pathway of gingival inflammation in humans. J Periodontol 1965;36:141-147 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1965.36.2.141
  9. Glickman I, Smulow JB. Further observations on the effects of trauma from occlusion. J Periodontol 1967;38:280-293 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1967.38.4.280
  10. Jin LJ and Cao CF.: Clinical diagnosis of trauma from occlusion and its relation with severity of periodontitis. J Clin periodontol 1992:19:92-97 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1992.tb00446.x
  11. Lawrence A. Weinberg. A cinematic study of centric and eccentric occlusions. J Prosthet Dent 1964;24: 290
  12. Lee WC, Eakle WS. Stress-induced cervical lesions: Review of advances in the past 10 years. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:487-494 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90451-5
  13. Lindhe J, Svanverg G. Influence of trauma from occlussion on progression of experimental periodontitis in the beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol 1974;1:3-14 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1974.tb01234.x
  14. Martha E.Nunn and Stephen K. Harrel. The effect of occlusal discrepancies on periodontitis. I. Relationship of initial occlusal discrepancies to initial clinical parameters. J Periodontol 2001;72: 485-494 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.4.485
  15. Operative Dentistry. Non-carious cervical lesions. 2003;28:109-113
  16. Polson AM. Trauma and progression of marginal periodontitis in squirrel monkeys. II. Co-destructive factors of periodontitis and mechanically produced injurity. J Periodont Res 1974;9:108-113 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1974.tb00661.x
  17. Rees JS, Hammadeh M, Jagger DC. Abfraction lesion formation in maxillary incisors, canines and premolars; A finite element study. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:149-154 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2003.00018.x
  18. Shefter G., and W. McFall. Occlusal relations and periodontal status in human adults. J Periodontol 1984;55:368-374 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1984.55.6.368
  19. Waerhaug J. The infrabony pocket and its relationship to trauma from occlusion and subgingival plaque. J Periodontol 1976;3:110-122 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1976.tb01857.x
  20. Waerhaug J. The angular bony defect and its relationship to trauma from occlusion and down growth of the subgingival plaque. J Periodontol 1979;50:355-365 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1979.50.7.355
  21. Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J, Sinclair F and Thilander B. Some periodontal tissue resections to orthodontic tooth movement in monkeys. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:121-129 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1987.tb00954.x
  22. Youdelis RA, Mann WV.,Jr The prevalence and possible role of nonworking contacts in periodontal disease. Periodontics 1965;3:219